yardbarker

Hickson to Lakers.

Moderators: moocow007, loserX, Texas Chuck, HartfordWhalers, Trader_Joe, jazzfan1971

Post#1 Hickson to Lakers.
Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:24 pm by fart

LA in
Hickson

Portland in:
Clark
Hill
Future first (2016 maybe? not sure when the Lakers will have a pick they can trade :lol: )

LA does it to get someone that gobbles up rebounds and an athletic guy that can bang down low. Portland does it to try and develop Clark and Hill as part of their core with Lillard.
SargentBargs101 wrote:
CB-Blazer wrote:what the heck is an Ebanks?

The remote delivery of new and traditional banking products and services through electronic delivery channels. There you go bud :D
fart
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 2,714
And1: 337
Joined: May 21, 2011
Top

Post#2 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:27 pm by Wasabi_Johnson

Hickson says no.
Wasabi_Johnson
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,778
And1: 75
Joined: Jan 7, 2012
Top

Post#3 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:30 pm by Doddage

Wasabi_Johnson wrote:Hickson says no.

As does Portland.
Doddage
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,815
And1: 507
Joined: Jul 15, 2008
Top

Post#4 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:31 pm by RIPskaterdude

fart wrote:LA in
Hickson

Portland in:
Clark
Hill
Future first (2016 maybe? not sure when the Lakers will have a pick they can trade :lol: )

LA does it to get someone that gobbles up rebounds and an athletic guy that can bang down low. Portland does it to try and develop Clark and Hill as part of their core with Lillard.


Hill is out for the season.
RIPskaterdude


RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 63,479
And1: 11,472
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Top

Post#5 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:35 pm by DusterBuster

Typical Lakers fan trying to get a starter for scraps.

They don't have any 1st rounders to trade in the near future and they don't have any expiring contracts to offer that could free up extra cap space for the Blazers this summer. In other words, the Lakers have nothing to get Hickson with.
Devilzsidewalk wrote:DB is like the ultimate Wolves troll
DusterBuster


RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 15,632
And1: 1,216
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
Top

Post#6 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:43 pm by HartfordWhalers

DusterBuster wrote:Typical Lakers fan trying to get a starter for scraps.


Pretty sure fart was a Cleveland fan. Either way, lets try and not generalize. :)
HartfordWhalers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 12,233
And1: 748
Joined: Apr 6, 2010
Top

Post#7 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:37 pm by moocow007

fart wrote:LA in
Hickson

Portland in:
Clark
Hill


Hill is out for the season and I doubt the Lakers would be able to spin Clarks 3 good games into a guy that is averaging 12ppg/11rpg on 55% shooting in just 29 mpg (Hickson).

Future first (2016 maybe? not sure when the Lakers will have a pick they can trade :lol: )


2032 I believe? :D

LA does it to get someone that gobbles up rebounds and an athletic guy that can bang down low. Portland does it to try and develop Clark and Hill as part of their core with Lillard.


Develop them into what? You kinda are just taking 2 guys that have been ho hum for 3+ years and assuming that jsut because they're kinda young and haven't produced much that they can develop into something worth considering as a core next to Lillard?
Image
moocow007




Global Mod
Global Mod
User avatar
Posts: 70,012
And1: 2,719
Joined: Jan 6, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
Top

Post#8 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:43 pm by Jase

DusterBuster wrote:Typical Lakers fan trying to get a starter for scraps.


Look at his avatar, then try again.
"A winner listens. A loser just waits until it's their turn to talk."
Jase
RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 13,054
And1: 148
Joined: Aug 1, 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI.
Top

Post#9 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:51 pm by Wizenheimer

HartfordWhalers wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:Typical Lakers fan trying to get a starter for scraps.


Pretty sure fart was a Cleveland fan. Either way, lets try and not generalize. :)


it's hard not generalize about farts....unless you're in the room
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 23,964
And1: 840
Joined: May 27, 2007
Top

Post#10 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:10 pm by Underkanter

Portland laughs and hangs up. No one in the west wants to help out LAL. They finally get to beat up on the playground bully.
Underkanter
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,534
And1: 94
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Top

Post#11 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:17 pm by re49gb_2gho32fp

In the off-season, yes.

Hickson for Gasol.
re49gb_2gho32fp
Banned User
Posts: 3,198
And1: 14
Joined: Jun 2, 2010
Top

Post#12 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:13 pm by RoyalWun

re49gb_2gho32fp wrote:In the off-season, yes.

Hickson for Gasol.


Good luck getting Portland to agree to that.
Portland 2013-2014:

D. Lillard | M. Williams | E. Watson
W. Matthews | C. McCollum | W. Barton | A. Crabbe
N. Batum | D. Wright
L. Aldridge | T. Robinson | V. Claver
R. Lopez | J. Freeland | M. Leonard
RoyalWun



Assistant Coach
User avatar
Posts: 4,123
And1: 113
Joined: Jul 4, 2009
Location: NY, New York
Top

Post#13 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:18 pm by HartfordWhalers

RoyalWun wrote:
re49gb_2gho32fp wrote:In the off-season, yes.

Hickson for Gasol.


Good luck getting Portland to agree to that.


And unless Dwight walks (and the trade then drops 10m in salary), LAL would be a lux cap team and wouldn't be able to do a S&T (new rule).
HartfordWhalers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 12,233
And1: 748
Joined: Apr 6, 2010
Top

Post#14 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:34 am by Oden2

IF the Blazers trade Hickson to the Lakers Hill and Clark isn't enough considering Hill's injury.
Oden2


RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 16,232
And1: 377
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Portland
Top

Post#15 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Sat Jan 19, 2013 8:45 am by branny

Yep Hill's out I see no reason for Portland to do this
NaturalThunder wrote:OKC killing Serge's MVP candidacy...2-0 without Ibaka on the season.
branny
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,810
And1: 27
Joined: Jun 1, 2012
Top

Post#16 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:58 am by old rem

xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:
fart wrote:LA in
Hickson

Portland in:
Clark
Hill
Future first (2016 maybe? not sure when the Lakers will have a pick they can trade :lol: )

LA does it to get someone that gobbles up rebounds and an athletic guy that can bang down low. Portland does it to try and develop Clark and Hill as part of their core with Lillard.


Hill is out for the season.


Yeah one of those deals based on "oh,I hoped nobody noticed that", and Hickson has been getting better,so even were Hill healthy,it would not happen. Next tradeable Laker pick...2017. That's not worth squat right now.
CENSORED... No comment.
old rem
RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 44,577
And1: 185
Joined: Jun 13, 2005
Location: Witness Protection
Top

Post#17 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:02 am by magic wand time

I think I saw somebody post a few months ago that the Lakers and Blazers haven't made a trade ever, or in like 30+ years. Seems these two franchises don't want to help each other.
milesfides wrote:If I were management and I saw one of my players crying, tweeting, and listening to Drake, I would punch him in the face.

Stern's Legacy in two words: BASKETBALL REASONS {the NBA's future instantly changed}
magic wand time
Junior
User avatar
Posts: 479
And1: 6
Joined: Jun 13, 2012
Location: MagicWand.Mich
Top

Post#18 Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:15 am by HartfordWhalers

old rem wrote:
xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:
fart wrote:LA in
Hickson

Portland in:
Clark
Hill
Future first (2016 maybe? not sure when the Lakers will have a pick they can trade :lol: )

LA does it to get someone that gobbles up rebounds and an athletic guy that can bang down low. Portland does it to try and develop Clark and Hill as part of their core with Lillard.


Hill is out for the season.


Yeah one of those deals based on "oh,I hoped nobody noticed that", and Hickson has been getting better,so even were Hill healthy,it would not happen. Next tradeable Laker pick...2017. That's not worth squat right now.


2017 was traded already (Orlando/Dwight).

They could trade a 2019 with it turning into a 2nd and/or cash if it can't be traded (either because its lotto protected or because the 2017 pick is pushed back from its protection or the 2015 pick). So, they could go and owe the '13, '15, '17 and '19 picks. They also could offer pick swaps for even numbered years, if looking to mortgage future assets further...
HartfordWhalers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 12,233
And1: 748
Joined: Apr 6, 2010
Top


Return to Trades and Transactions


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Boarder Patrol, Penny520, Skip2MY, Yahoo [Bot]