Page 1 of 1
Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:24 pm
by fart
LA in
Hickson
Portland in:
Clark
Hill
Future first (2016 maybe? not sure when the Lakers will have a pick they can trade
)
LA does it to get someone that gobbles up rebounds and an athletic guy that can bang down low. Portland does it to try and develop Clark and Hill as part of their core with Lillard.
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:27 pm
by kobe_vs_jordan
Hickson says no.
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:30 pm
by Doddage
Wasabi_Johnson wrote:Hickson says no.
As does Portland.
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:31 pm
by RIPskaterdude
fart wrote:LA in
Hickson
Portland in:
Clark
Hill
Future first (2016 maybe? not sure when the Lakers will have a pick they can trade
)
LA does it to get someone that gobbles up rebounds and an athletic guy that can bang down low. Portland does it to try and develop Clark and Hill as part of their core with Lillard.
Hill is out for the season.
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:35 pm
by DusterBuster
Typical Lakers fan trying to get a starter for scraps.
They don't have any 1st rounders to trade in the near future and they don't have any expiring contracts to offer that could free up extra cap space for the Blazers this summer. In other words, the Lakers have nothing to get Hickson with.
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:43 pm
by HartfordWhalers
DusterBuster wrote:Typical Lakers fan trying to get a starter for scraps.
Pretty sure fart was a Cleveland fan. Either way, lets try and not generalize.
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:37 pm
by moocow007
fart wrote:LA in
Hickson
Portland in:
Clark
Hill
Hill is out for the season and I doubt the Lakers would be able to spin Clarks 3 good games into a guy that is averaging 12ppg/11rpg on 55% shooting in just 29 mpg (Hickson).
Future first (2016 maybe? not sure when the Lakers will have a pick they can trade
)
2032 I believe?
LA does it to get someone that gobbles up rebounds and an athletic guy that can bang down low. Portland does it to try and develop Clark and Hill as part of their core with Lillard.
Develop them into what? You kinda are just taking 2 guys that have been ho hum for 3+ years and assuming that jsut because they're kinda young and haven't produced much that they can develop into something worth considering as a core next to Lillard?
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:43 am
by Jase
DusterBuster wrote:Typical Lakers fan trying to get a starter for scraps.
Look at his avatar, then try again.
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:51 am
by Wizenheimer
HartfordWhalers wrote:DusterBuster wrote:Typical Lakers fan trying to get a starter for scraps.
Pretty sure fart was a Cleveland fan. Either way, lets try and not generalize.
it's hard not generalize about farts....unless you're in the room
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:10 pm
by AingesBurner
Portland laughs and hangs up. No one in the west wants to help out LAL. They finally get to beat up on the playground bully.
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:17 pm
by re49gb_2gho32fp
In the off-season, yes.
Hickson for Gasol.
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:13 pm
by RoyalWun
re49gb_2gho32fp wrote:In the off-season, yes.
Hickson for Gasol.
Good luck getting Portland to agree to that.
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:18 pm
by HartfordWhalers
RoyalWun wrote:re49gb_2gho32fp wrote:In the off-season, yes.
Hickson for Gasol.
Good luck getting Portland to agree to that.
And unless Dwight walks (and the trade then drops 10m in salary), LAL would be a lux cap team and wouldn't be able to do a S&T (new rule).
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:34 am
by PDXKnight
IF the Blazers trade Hickson to the Lakers Hill and Clark isn't enough considering Hill's injury.
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:45 pm
by branny
Yep Hill's out I see no reason for Portland to do this
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:58 pm
by old rem
xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:fart wrote:LA in
Hickson
Portland in:
Clark
Hill
Future first (2016 maybe? not sure when the Lakers will have a pick they can trade
)
LA does it to get someone that gobbles up rebounds and an athletic guy that can bang down low. Portland does it to try and develop Clark and Hill as part of their core with Lillard.
Hill is out for the season.
Yeah one of those deals based on "oh,I hoped nobody noticed that", and Hickson has been getting better,so even were Hill healthy,it would not happen. Next tradeable Laker pick...2017. That's not worth squat right now.
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:02 pm
by magic wand time
I think I saw somebody post a few months ago that the Lakers and Blazers haven't made a trade ever, or in like 30+ years. Seems these two franchises don't want to help each other.
Re: Hickson to Lakers.
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:15 pm
by HartfordWhalers
old rem wrote:xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:fart wrote:LA in
Hickson
Portland in:
Clark
Hill
Future first (2016 maybe? not sure when the Lakers will have a pick they can trade
)
LA does it to get someone that gobbles up rebounds and an athletic guy that can bang down low. Portland does it to try and develop Clark and Hill as part of their core with Lillard.
Hill is out for the season.
Yeah one of those deals based on "oh,I hoped nobody noticed that", and Hickson has been getting better,so even were Hill healthy,it would not happen. Next tradeable Laker pick...2017. That's not worth squat right now.
2017 was traded already (Orlando/Dwight).
They could trade a 2019 with it turning into a 2nd and/or cash if it can't be traded (either because its lotto protected or because the 2017 pick is pushed back from its protection or the 2015 pick). So, they
could go and owe the '13, '15, '17 and '19 picks. They also could offer pick swaps for even numbered years, if looking to mortgage future assets further...