what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,818
- And1: 3,380
- Joined: Apr 05, 2012
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
Chi in: Mizra Teletovic and Ben Gordon
Chi out: Carlos Boozer and Rip Hamilton
Brooklyn in: Carlos Boozer and Rip Hamilton
Brooklyn out: Kris Humphries, Marshon Brooks and Mizra Teletovic
Charlotte in: Kris Humphries and Marshon Brooks
Charlotte out: Ben Gordon
Chicago Line-up
Rose/Hinrich/Teague
Bellinelli/Gordon
Deng/Butler
Taj/Teletovic
Noah/2013 Draft pick
Chicago cuts salary and moves Boozer. The postion Chicago most needs upgraded is SG and they get that in Ben Gordon. In my opinion they're just not interested in Brooks and Humphries even with factoring in the earlier expiring money.
Brooklyn line-up
Williams/Watson
Johnson/Hamilton
Wallace/
Boozer/Evans
Lopez/Blatche
The reason Brooklyn doesn't just trade humphries for Gordon is because they don't need a 12 million dollar 2-guard when they already have a 20 million dollar one. They do need a PF though so enter Boozer.
Charlotte line-up:
Honestly, I don't know their roster or depth chart. Ben Gordon's not working out there so this moves him along while allowing them to add a cheap, young shooting guard prospect and big on an expiring contract that can rebound.
I just don't think any 2-team trades would work but that by all coming together they could get what they're looking for.
Chi out: Carlos Boozer and Rip Hamilton
Brooklyn in: Carlos Boozer and Rip Hamilton
Brooklyn out: Kris Humphries, Marshon Brooks and Mizra Teletovic
Charlotte in: Kris Humphries and Marshon Brooks
Charlotte out: Ben Gordon
Chicago Line-up
Rose/Hinrich/Teague
Bellinelli/Gordon
Deng/Butler
Taj/Teletovic
Noah/2013 Draft pick
Chicago cuts salary and moves Boozer. The postion Chicago most needs upgraded is SG and they get that in Ben Gordon. In my opinion they're just not interested in Brooks and Humphries even with factoring in the earlier expiring money.
Brooklyn line-up
Williams/Watson
Johnson/Hamilton
Wallace/
Boozer/Evans
Lopez/Blatche
The reason Brooklyn doesn't just trade humphries for Gordon is because they don't need a 12 million dollar 2-guard when they already have a 20 million dollar one. They do need a PF though so enter Boozer.
Charlotte line-up:
Honestly, I don't know their roster or depth chart. Ben Gordon's not working out there so this moves him along while allowing them to add a cheap, young shooting guard prospect and big on an expiring contract that can rebound.
I just don't think any 2-team trades would work but that by all coming together they could get what they're looking for.
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,720
- And1: 19,815
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
Why would Charlotte dumb Ben Gordon for 2 vastly lesser players?
tsherkin wrote:Locked due to absence of adult conversation.
penbeast0 wrote:Guys, if you don't have anything to say, don't post.
Circa 2018
E-Balla wrote:LeBron is Jeff George.
Circa 2022
G35 wrote:Lebron is not that far off from WB in trade value.
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,818
- And1: 3,380
- Joined: Apr 05, 2012
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
Colbinii wrote:Why would Charlotte dumb Ben Gordon for 2 vastly lesser players?
Because Ben Gordon has been a disturbance to the team via that report that came out about him interupting practice and getting into it with the coach.
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,720
- And1: 19,815
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
drosestruts wrote:Colbinii wrote:Why would Charlotte dumb Ben Gordon for 2 vastly lesser players?
Because Ben Gordon has been a disturbance to the team via that report that came out about him interupting practice and getting into it with the coach.
Does it matter if he has been a disturbance to a trash team?
tsherkin wrote:Locked due to absence of adult conversation.
penbeast0 wrote:Guys, if you don't have anything to say, don't post.
Circa 2018
E-Balla wrote:LeBron is Jeff George.
Circa 2022
G35 wrote:Lebron is not that far off from WB in trade value.
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,818
- And1: 3,380
- Joined: Apr 05, 2012
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
Colbinii wrote:drosestruts wrote:Colbinii wrote:Why would Charlotte dumb Ben Gordon for 2 vastly lesser players?
Because Ben Gordon has been a disturbance to the team via that report that came out about him interupting practice and getting into it with the coach.
Does it matter if he has been a disturbance to a trash team?
The reports saying they wanted to move him at the trade deadline because of the incident suggests it does matter to the Bobcats.
Just cause you're on a bad team doesn't mean you can be an insubordinate.
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 29,174
- And1: 3,948
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
Charlotte was supposedly the one who made the BG for Hump offer and it was up to Brooklyn to accept. I've heard one reason they did not was because they think Hump's slightly smaller salary (12m vs. 13.2m next season) will be easier to move... but I'm sure there were others such as continuing to develop Brooks. (apparently there is a rift between PJC and ownership on the handling of the less experienced players which has carried over from Avery).
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 29,174
- And1: 3,948
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
LApwnd wrote:mainmolina wrote:Boozer. Great player, just overpaid, and I'd love to have shorter contracts. Maybe Brooks can turn it around. Throw in RIP so salaries match. Better than Gasol, by a lot.
Humphries is better than Pau? now I've heard it all
Read again.. he was saying Boozer was better than Pau.
Which, based upon this season/injuries/fit for BK, I don't think that is untrue.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 29,174
- And1: 3,948
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
Colbinii wrote:Does it matter if he has been a disturbance to a trash team?
Of course.
Charlotte is trying to groom a very young team. The last thing you want is the well to be poisoned.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 20,606
- And1: 1,146
- Joined: Jul 09, 2008
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
Trader_Joe wrote:LApwnd wrote:mainmolina wrote:Boozer. Great player, just overpaid, and I'd love to have shorter contracts. Maybe Brooks can turn it around. Throw in RIP so salaries match. Better than Gasol, by a lot.
Humphries is better than Pau? now I've heard it all
Read again.. he was saying Boozer was better than Pau.
Which, based upon this season/injuries/fit for BK, I don't think that is untrue.
why would he mean it that way when LA clearly has no interest in regards to these BK players/package? To me this is more in ref. to my offer of Pau for Boozer/Deng/fillers
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 29,174
- And1: 3,948
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
LApwnd wrote:why would he mean it that way when LA clearly has no interest in regards to these BK players/package? To me this is more in ref. to my offer of Pau for Boozer/Deng/fillers
The question was.. what can BK get for HTB?
He said:
Boozer. Great player, just overpaid, and I'd love to have shorter contracts. Maybe Brooks can turn it around. Throw in RIP so salaries match. Better than Gasol, by a lot.
There is no mention of Humphries in his reply. Thus I think he means Boozer (not Humphries) is better than Gasol which again given their respective seasons, injuries and fits, I think he may be right.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 20,606
- And1: 1,146
- Joined: Jul 09, 2008
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
Trader_Joe wrote:LApwnd wrote:why would he mean it that way when LA clearly has no interest in regards to these BK players/package? To me this is more in ref. to my offer of Pau for Boozer/Deng/fillers
The question was.. what can BK get for HTB?
He said:
Boozer. Great player, just overpaid, and I'd love to have shorter contracts. Maybe Brooks can turn it around. Throw in RIP so salaries match. Better than Gasol, by a lot.
There is no mention of Humphries in his reply. Thus I think he means Boozer (not Humphries) is better than Gasol which again given their respective seasons, injuries and fits, I think he may be right.
again, how do you even come up with this interpretation when there's NOBODY in this thred even offering up Pau for this package of Nets players?
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 20,606
- And1: 1,146
- Joined: Jul 09, 2008
Re: what can Brooklyn get for: hump, teletovic, brooks?
Trader_Joe wrote:LApwnd wrote:why would he mean it that way when LA clearly has no interest in regards to these BK players/package? To me this is more in ref. to my offer of Pau for Boozer/Deng/fillers
The question was.. what can BK get for HTB?
He said:
Boozer. Great player, just overpaid, and I'd love to have shorter contracts. Maybe Brooks can turn it around. Throw in RIP so salaries match. Better than Gasol, by a lot.
There is no mention of Humphries in his reply. Thus I think he means Boozer (not Humphries) is better than Gasol which again given their respective seasons, injuries and fits, I think he may be right.
again, how do you even come up with this interpretation when there's NOBODY in this thred even offering up Pau for this package of Nets players?
Return to Trades and Transactions