yardbarker

Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Moderators: loserX, HartfordWhalers, moocow007, VintaGe36, Trader_Joe, jazzfan1971

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby DusterBuster on Thu Feb 21, 2013 5:59 pm

Sun Scorched wrote:I don't understand the whole "Hawks weren't getting the value they wanted" nonsense.


How exactly is it "nonsense"? If they would have gotten the value they wanted for him, Smith wouldn't still be in Atlanta right now. He is, so obviously no one offered Atlanta they value they wanted to pull the trigger on a deal. Pretty basic logic here.......
Devilzsidewalk wrote:DB is like the ultimate Wolves troll
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
 
Posts: 12069
And1: 110
Joined: Jan 31, 2010

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby Guy986 on Thu Feb 21, 2013 6:06 pm

Utah didn't move any of their bigs??
User avatar
Guy986
RealGM
 
Posts: 16846
And1: 83
Joined: Oct 8, 2005
Location: Positivity

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby DusterBuster on Thu Feb 21, 2013 6:14 pm

Guy986 wrote:Utah didn't move any of their bigs??


they didn't move anything.
Devilzsidewalk wrote:DB is like the ultimate Wolves troll
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
 
Posts: 12069
And1: 110
Joined: Jan 31, 2010

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby Lindecision on Thu Feb 21, 2013 6:42 pm

DusterBuster wrote:I think people were dooped by all the talk surrounding Smith. It was pretty clear the Hawks were never going to get the value they wanted for him.


perhaps Atlanta can get value (and the C they want) in a S&T for Asik + filler... could that be their line of thinking?

this does depend on Houston signing Dwight as a free agent though, Josh would then be willing to sign for less money

then by dealing Asik's salary Houston would have enough cap room to keep Parsons long term, actually i'm only presuming they have enough cap room
Lindecision
Freshman
 
Posts: 91
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 20, 2012

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby theatlfan on Thu Feb 21, 2013 6:44 pm

Sun Scorched wrote:I don't understand the whole "Hawks weren't getting the value they wanted" nonsense.

Yeah, they aren't going to get Gortat + Dudley + 1st for him, but they could have gotten Gortat... Which is better than nothing.

What are they hoping for now? A S&T?
Nonsense is what you suggest though. In the NBA, it's better to be dreadful than mediocre, and one sure way to be mediocre is to trade better talent for less simply in the name of getting something. Do you honestly believe that CLE would have been better off today than if they had traded LeBron for a mid-tier starting C a few years ago?

Honestly, I've always figured this one would go to FA. I think our hope would be that we'd re-sign him to a reasonable deal once he sees the market, then SNT him. Failing those options, I'm not really sure what the next stage would be though. With the CBA the way it is, you can't really go on a full scale rebuilding effort since you have to carry a minimum salary or run into the same issues with those at the LT threshold. Should be interesting to see where this goes if this route is taken.
Image
User avatar
theatlfan
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1607
And1: 4
Joined: Dec 22, 2008
Location: Where I at

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby Mr. E on Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:04 pm

Guy986 wrote:Utah didn't move any of their bigs??


That's the biggest surprise for me. I thought that they would have moved one.
User avatar
Mr. E
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 7525
And1: 64
Joined: Apr 15, 2006
Location: Defending Planet Earth with a Jet-Pack & a Ray-Gun!

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby theatlfan on Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:17 pm

My biggest surprise was Mozgov not being traded. He's buried in DEN and I would have thought that there would have been a team willing to give up a useful part for a trial run on him.
Image
User avatar
theatlfan
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1607
And1: 4
Joined: Dec 22, 2008
Location: Where I at

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby Ruckusmh on Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:19 pm

I'm a huge Jazz fan, but the fact that we have essentially the same pieces right now as we did the moment we traded Deron is atrocious. I don't understand the FO's obsession with becoming a treadmill team.
Ruckusmh
Sophomore
 
Posts: 235
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 8, 2011

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby bryanoid on Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:23 pm

Monta **** Ellis
:banghead:
The Colonel for All-Defense
bryanoid
Junior
 
Posts: 381
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 20, 2010

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby giberish on Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:29 pm

One of Milsap/Jefferson seemed certain to be dealt.

Josh Smith was more likely than either one individually.
giberish
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4873
And1: 15
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
Location: Whereever you go - there you are

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby jazzfan1971 on Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:37 pm

I totally expected Utah to keep Millsap and Jefferson. By my way of thinking both or either will have more value come summer when the Jazz can ship them out not as rentals but as players in a sign and trade.

I think the Jazz probably saw it that way as well.

Personally, I was surprised Boston didn't move one or both of KG or Pierce. Or even Rondo. Seems like the iron was hot on that one but they chose not to strike. When Boston gets run out in the first round I think Boston fans will look back on this as a missed opportunity. (no offense, Jazz are probably getting swept in the 1st round again)
Old Rem on a Favors/Hayward for Curry/Wright proposal: "Seriously? Neither of Favors-Hayward started or accounted for even 7 ppg. Curry + Wright started, played 35 min + and combined for about 35 ppg. Far from tempting for GSW."
User avatar
jazzfan1971
Global Mod
 
Posts: 29956
And1: 59
Joined: Jul 15, 2001
Location: Salt Lake City

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby Guy986 on Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:42 pm

jazzfan1971 wrote:I totally expected Utah to keep Millsap and Jefferson. By my way of thinking both or either will have more value come summer when the Jazz can ship them out not as rentals but as players in a sign and trade.

I think the Jazz probably saw it that way as well.

Personally, I was surprised Boston didn't move one or both of KG or Pierce. Or even Rondo. Seems like the iron was hot on that one but they chose not to strike. When Boston gets run out in the first round I think Boston fans will look back on this as a missed opportunity. (no offense, Jazz are probably getting swept in the 1st round again)


How will the Jazz get ANYTHING of value for a guy like Paul Milsap when there are 8+ teams in the league with 10 million or more in capspace.

Jazz will either match a 10 million a year contract for millsap or lose him. Theres no S&T. I think they just lost themselves an asset.
User avatar
Guy986
RealGM
 
Posts: 16846
And1: 83
Joined: Oct 8, 2005
Location: Positivity

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby Ruckusmh on Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:08 pm

Guy986 wrote:
jazzfan1971 wrote:I totally expected Utah to keep Millsap and Jefferson. By my way of thinking both or either will have more value come summer when the Jazz can ship them out not as rentals but as players in a sign and trade.

I think the Jazz probably saw it that way as well.

Personally, I was surprised Boston didn't move one or both of KG or Pierce. Or even Rondo. Seems like the iron was hot on that one but they chose not to strike. When Boston gets run out in the first round I think Boston fans will look back on this as a missed opportunity. (no offense, Jazz are probably getting swept in the 1st round again)


How will the Jazz get ANYTHING of value for a guy like Paul Milsap when there are 8+ teams in the league with 10 million or more in capspace.

Jazz will either match a 10 million a year contract for millsap or lose him. Theres no S&T. I think they just lost themselves an asset.


+1
Ruckusmh
Sophomore
 
Posts: 235
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 8, 2011

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby loserX on Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:26 pm

Jazz fan here: not surprised at all. We wanted a young PG and obviously couldn't get one. We are a fringe playoff team, and trading a starter for crap probably puts us back in the weak part of the lottery.

So if all we were being was offered in return were picks in the 20s, it's not worth it. Playoff games are worth more than that.

The surprise to me is Rip. Chicago is paying a lot of money to keep him this year.
loserX
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 24160
And1: 8
Joined: Jun 29, 2006

Re: Biggest Surprise Not traded?

Postby franktony on Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:32 pm

I was surprised that we didn't move Dejuan Blair, but SAS asking price was probably too high.

Cannot complain. I'd rather keep him around as an injury insurance than trading him for a crap 2nd round pick.

I was way more surprised with SA's interest in Redick. To me it didn't make any sense.
Shaq on Duncan:SA won because of TD, a guy I could never break.I could talk trash to Ewing, get in D-Rob's face, get a rise out of Mourning,but when I went at Tim he’d look at me like he was bored and say:“Hey,Shaq, watch this shot right off the glass.”
User avatar
franktony
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1593
And1: 13
Joined: Jul 16, 2010
Location: São Paulo - Brazil

PreviousNext

Return to Trades and Transactions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MaceCase, n3bomb, pauk89