Offseason: Lakers and Thunder

Moderators: moocow007, loserX, Smitty731, HartfordWhalers, Chuck Texas, jazzfan1971, Trader_Joe, bondom34

Kupchak9
Analyst
Posts: 3,286
And1: 752
Joined: Jan 21, 2012

Offseason: Lakers and Thunder 

Post#1 » by Kupchak9 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:09 am

Lets say neither the Thunder or Lakers win the title this year. KMart decides he wants out for more money than OKC can offer

Who says no to a deal with Pau going to the Thunder and KMart to LA.
Image

Mars_Blackmon wrote:Lakers could destroy the Heat
DowJones
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,791
And1: 522
Joined: Feb 22, 2008

Re: Offseason: Lakers and Thunder 

Post#2 » by DowJones » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:20 am

LA. If Martin is asking for that much, why would LA want to pay?
Guy986
RealGM
Posts: 17,755
And1: 622
Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Location: BBG Nation unite!

Re: Offseason: Lakers and Thunder 

Post#3 » by Guy986 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:27 am

Thunder.

They didn't want to pay Harden the max because of luxury tax. What makes you think they want old Gasol now?
Jersey Generals
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,846
And1: 52
Joined: May 19, 2008

Re: Offseason: Lakers and Thunder 

Post#4 » by Jersey Generals » Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:52 am

Lakers wouldn't be able to get Kevin Martin in a sign and trade. Or anyone, actually.
User avatar
winter_mute_13
Veteran
Posts: 2,778
And1: 254
Joined: Oct 08, 2003
 

Re: Offseason: Lakers and Thunder 

Post#5 » by winter_mute_13 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 6:53 am

Jersey Generals wrote:Lakers wouldn't be able to get Kevin Martin in a sign and trade. Or anyone, actually.


Yup. New CBA rule kicking in. Mark Cuban decided to break up the champion Mavs team because of this rule (he cited the lack of S&T as a bigger factor than the new high tax rate).

OKC won't want Gasol anyway because they want to avoid tax. The most likely landing spot for Pau would be on a cap space team that swung and missed on Howard, IMO.
branny
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,810
And1: 27
Joined: Jun 01, 2012

Re: Offseason: Lakers and Thunder 

Post#6 » by branny » Sat Feb 23, 2013 7:11 am

Jersey Generals wrote:Lakers wouldn't be able to get Kevin Martin in a sign and trade. Or anyone, actually.

True that, no S&T for teams over cap I think it was
User avatar
winter_mute_13
Veteran
Posts: 2,778
And1: 254
Joined: Oct 08, 2003
 

Re: Offseason: Lakers and Thunder 

Post#7 » by winter_mute_13 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:16 am

branny wrote:
Jersey Generals wrote:Lakers wouldn't be able to get Kevin Martin in a sign and trade. Or anyone, actually.

True that, no S&T for teams over cap I think it was


Over the apron actually (roughly $74m next year). Lakers are way over that though.
User avatar
Young_Star11
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,012
And1: 420
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: RealGM
   

Re: Offseason: Lakers and Thunder 

Post#8 » by Young_Star11 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:14 am

Why do supposed rivals want to a trade like that?

Seem very incompatible.
User avatar
inquisitive
RealGM
Posts: 11,834
And1: 728
Joined: Aug 27, 2010

Re: Offseason: Lakers and Thunder 

Post#9 » by inquisitive » Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:04 pm

now when you think about it...gasol might be very difficult to trade unless the lakers are willing to take back players with exisiting mid to big contracts which is something the lakers want to avoid anyway...they might end up amnestying gasol in july or riding with him for another season. there shouldn't be a shortage of teams wanting gasol since his deal is expiring, but are the lakers willing to take back players with non expiring deals?...i doubt it...also, they want very good players back too so wanting good players on expiring or decent deals is gonna be hard to find since those teams are likely to keep those players...the looming increase of lux tax is scaring alot of teams.
A rare look at Saenchai's Son sparring with our newest fighter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7A3mrtK95q0
User avatar
djthesonicsfan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,331
And1: 147
Joined: Aug 13, 2007
     

Re: Offseason: Lakers and Thunder 

Post#10 » by djthesonicsfan » Sun Feb 24, 2013 6:10 pm

Zero chance we even consider this offer.

Gasol makes too much money. Lakers are our rival. Ibaka is our starting PF and he's good.
notSonics 2015
Starters - Trey, Waiters, Singler, Kanter, Adams
Rotation - Augustine, Morrow, Novak, McGary
Bench -
Doghouse - Lamb, PJ3
Pipeline - Christon, Huestis, Abrines
Injured - KD, Ibaka, Roberson, Collison :waaa:
AdonisDeMarion
Rookie
Posts: 1,020
And1: 55
Joined: Jun 22, 2012

Re: Offseason: Lakers and Thunder 

Post#11 » by AdonisDeMarion » Sat Mar 9, 2013 1:39 am

If it was Ibaka and Martin then maybe
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,034
And1: 1,655
Joined: Oct 13, 2009

Re: Offseason: Lakers and Thunder 

Post#12 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Sat Mar 9, 2013 3:25 am

This is an instant no for OKC and is illegal for LAL.
Golabki
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,527
And1: 284
Joined: Jan 31, 2005

Re: Offseason: Lakers and Thunder 

Post#13 » by Golabki » Sat Mar 9, 2013 1:11 pm

OKC says no. There is no way they can add that much salary. If Kevin Martin gets > 10 M, OKC will have to just let him walk and go with either an MLE SG or Lamb.

If it's Martin + Perk for Gasol... that MIGHT work OKC, but the Lakers probably don't do it.

Return to Trades and Transactions


Users browsing this forum: mcfly1204