Lakers trade #6 for...
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 224
- And1: 5
- Joined: Aug 19, 2013
Lakers trade #6 for...
Assuming the draft order stays true, what could the Lakers get for the #6 pick?
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
- crosko42
- Starter
- Posts: 2,198
- And1: 681
- Joined: Feb 16, 2010
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
- Viper1500
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,830
- And1: 2,702
- Joined: Apr 15, 2009
- Location: Orlando, FL
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
Afflalo+12 for Nash+6th?
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,671
- And1: 2,367
- Joined: Feb 27, 2013
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
Nash/#6 for Rondo seems to make the most sense. Nash/#6 for Milsap if Atlanta wants to blow it up?
2016 GMAT Blazers
Howard/Nene/
Griffin/M.Leonard/T.Jones
Porter/Marc.Morris/J.Johnson
McCollum/Stauskas/Thompson/Seldon
Lillard/Bayless/DeColo
Howard/Nene/
Griffin/M.Leonard/T.Jones
Porter/Marc.Morris/J.Johnson
McCollum/Stauskas/Thompson/Seldon
Lillard/Bayless/DeColo
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
- packforfreedom
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,275
- And1: 4,020
- Joined: Nov 06, 2012
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
not Kevin Love.
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 21,364
- And1: 24,662
- Joined: Feb 09, 2014
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
Rondo, in my opinion, is worth more than 6 in this draft. He's still fairly young, on a good deal, and without him it means the Celtics are in a full scale rebuild. I don't think they are going that route. I think they are going to try to add pieces and contend.
Check out my NBA Salary and Roster sheets: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1T2Eg_zvqNqQD_5TpE4Ns6xhElatXdLpYG1roZtRLyvE/edit?usp=sharing
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
- Viper1500
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,830
- And1: 2,702
- Joined: Apr 15, 2009
- Location: Orlando, FL
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
I wouldn't trade Rondo for Smart/Vonleh if I were Boston.
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,550
- And1: 880
- Joined: Sep 05, 2009
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
For the #5 pick to get Exum....along with I don't know what.
Boston wants to contend they say, so be it. Throw one of those overpaid role players to LA for #6 and a 2nd and get better value contracts with cap space.
Boston wants to contend they say, so be it. Throw one of those overpaid role players to LA for #6 and a 2nd and get better value contracts with cap space.
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 85,797
- And1: 88,808
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
Smitty731 wrote:Rondo, in my opinion, is worth more than 6 in this draft. He's still fairly young, on a good deal, and without him it means the Celtics are in a full scale rebuild. I don't think they are going that route. I think they are going to try to add pieces and contend.
he has a year left on his deal. Extended you can make that argument, but Im not sure he's even worth the #6 if there's a risk he walks and I always value veterans more than picks.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 21,364
- And1: 24,662
- Joined: Feb 09, 2014
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
Texas Chuck wrote:Smitty731 wrote:Rondo, in my opinion, is worth more than 6 in this draft. He's still fairly young, on a good deal, and without him it means the Celtics are in a full scale rebuild. I don't think they are going that route. I think they are going to try to add pieces and contend.
he has a year left on his deal. Extended you can make that argument, but Im not sure he's even worth the #6 if there's a risk he walks and I always value veterans more than picks.
I probably should have been more clear. By good deal, I meant he isn't an overpaid veteran. At 12.9, I feel he is very fairly compensated.
I agree with you point too. At least with veterans you know what you have. Not saying I wouldn't consider dealing Rondo if it meant Wiggins or Parker (maybe Embiid, but the back scares me). Beyond that, I'm not doing it. Not without other pieces coming back too. And Nash doesn't count, as sad as that is.
Check out my NBA Salary and Roster sheets: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1T2Eg_zvqNqQD_5TpE4Ns6xhElatXdLpYG1roZtRLyvE/edit?usp=sharing
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 20,606
- And1: 1,146
- Joined: Jul 09, 2008
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
Viper1500 wrote:Afflalo+12 for Nash+6th?
why?
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 224
- And1: 5
- Joined: Aug 19, 2013
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
Interesting responses so far.
I was looking at the trade history of picks 5-7 over the past 10 years or so. Here's what we have:
2004: Mavs trade Antawn Jamison for #5 (Harris), Stackhouse and Laettner
2007: Sonics trade Ray Allen and #34 (Baby) to BOS for #5 (Green), Szczerbiak and West
2009: Wolves trade Mike Miller/Randy Foye to WAS for #5 (Rubio), Thomas, Songalia and Pecherov
Though the sample size is small and two of the three trades involved Ernie Grunfeld, there is a loose standard:
a) getting back a recent all-star or two top-8 rotation players
b) unloading a bad contract (Nash in this case) in the process
I was looking at the trade history of picks 5-7 over the past 10 years or so. Here's what we have:
2004: Mavs trade Antawn Jamison for #5 (Harris), Stackhouse and Laettner
2007: Sonics trade Ray Allen and #34 (Baby) to BOS for #5 (Green), Szczerbiak and West
2009: Wolves trade Mike Miller/Randy Foye to WAS for #5 (Rubio), Thomas, Songalia and Pecherov
Though the sample size is small and two of the three trades involved Ernie Grunfeld, there is a loose standard:
a) getting back a recent all-star or two top-8 rotation players
b) unloading a bad contract (Nash in this case) in the process
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 224
- And1: 5
- Joined: Aug 19, 2013
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
Taj Gibson and Jimmy Butler? Chicago would likely target Smart or Vonleh with #6.
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 20,606
- And1: 1,146
- Joined: Jul 09, 2008
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
trading the 6th pick for average players or non star players that affect 2014 and 2015 cap room is a NON starter.
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 224
- And1: 5
- Joined: Aug 19, 2013
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
LApwnd wrote:trading the 6th pick for average players or non star players that affect 2014 and 2015 cap room is a NON starter.
OK so if the Lakers keep the pick then how are they going to make the playoffs next year?
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,821
- And1: 3,360
- Joined: Aug 07, 2010
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
Drose?
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,334
- And1: 2,671
- Joined: Nov 29, 2001
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
Posted this on the Bucks board:
Bucks trade: Knight, Henson, Middleton, Wolters, Raduljica, #31, #36, 2015#1 top 10 protected
LA trades: Nash, #6
Before you guys trash it LA right now has 4 players under contract for 36.5 after the draft they will have 5 players for 40.5. They don't have to just fill out the roster they need to fill out the roster with guys that can play.
After this trade they have 10 guys under contract for about $34.5 leaving 28.5 million for 2 players.
Say they go after Anthony starting at 20 million and Gortat at 8.5 million.
A lineup of
Marshall
Kobe
Carmelo
Henson
Gortat
Bench of
Knight
Middleton
Wolters
Raduljica
Sacre
#31
#36
actually gives them a chance to compete next year. And if Kobe comes back healthy, a darkhorse shot at the title. One thing is for sure. If LA is planning on competing next year they need to get some talented cheap talent.
Bucks trade: Knight, Henson, Middleton, Wolters, Raduljica, #31, #36, 2015#1 top 10 protected
LA trades: Nash, #6
Before you guys trash it LA right now has 4 players under contract for 36.5 after the draft they will have 5 players for 40.5. They don't have to just fill out the roster they need to fill out the roster with guys that can play.
After this trade they have 10 guys under contract for about $34.5 leaving 28.5 million for 2 players.
Say they go after Anthony starting at 20 million and Gortat at 8.5 million.
A lineup of
Marshall
Kobe
Carmelo
Henson
Gortat
Bench of
Knight
Middleton
Wolters
Raduljica
Sacre
#31
#36
actually gives them a chance to compete next year. And if Kobe comes back healthy, a darkhorse shot at the title. One thing is for sure. If LA is planning on competing next year they need to get some talented cheap talent.
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,243
- And1: 1,336
- Joined: Jun 07, 2011
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
Horford.
Ideally a third team gets Nash and Atlanta gets a center.
Atlanta gets Lakers pick and a true center for Horford.
Gasol (re-signed 2 year deal)
Horford
?
Bryant
?
Decent start before free agency kicks in.
Ideally a third team gets Nash and Atlanta gets a center.
Atlanta gets Lakers pick and a true center for Horford.
Gasol (re-signed 2 year deal)
Horford
?
Bryant
?
Decent start before free agency kicks in.
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,757
- And1: 6,216
- Joined: Aug 02, 2013
- Location: Niagara Peninsula
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
Would consider DeRozan for 6th and that assumes Smart is available. No Nash
LAL getting a young all star on a great contract.
Trade 6th to Detroit for 8th & 38th and the right to exchange 1sts. in 2016.
Trade 8th, 37th & 38th to Phoenix for 14th, 18th & 27th.
LAL getting a young all star on a great contract.
Trade 6th to Detroit for 8th & 38th and the right to exchange 1sts. in 2016.
Trade 8th, 37th & 38th to Phoenix for 14th, 18th & 27th.
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 224
- And1: 5
- Joined: Aug 19, 2013
Re: Lakers trade #6 for...
hege53190 wrote:Posted this on the Bucks board:
Bucks trade: Knight, Henson, Middleton, Wolters, Raduljica, #31, #36, 2015#1 top 10 protected
LA trades: Nash, #6
Before you guys trash it LA right now has 4 players under contract for 36.5 after the draft they will have 5 players for 40.5. They don't have to just fill out the roster they need to fill out the roster with guys that can play.
After this trade they have 10 guys under contract for about $34.5 leaving 28.5 million for 2 players.
Say they go after Anthony starting at 20 million and Gortat at 8.5 million.
A lineup of
Marshall
Kobe
Carmelo
Henson
Gortat
Bench of
Knight
Middleton
Wolters
Raduljica
Sacre
#31
#36
actually gives them a chance to compete next year. And if Kobe comes back healthy, a darkhorse shot at the title. One thing is for sure. If LA is planning on competing next year they need to get some talented cheap talent.
I like your idea. The Lakers need to think outside the box with this pick (unless they land in the top 3) because w/ Kobe making $24million, filling roster spots will be tough. Next to Kobe, Knight and Henson would be improved. All hinges on them getting Melo. Pretty good team if it all panned out. This is an easy trade for the Bucks.
Return to Trades and Transactions