Lakers trade #6 for...

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

1AndDone
Sophomore
Posts: 224
And1: 5
Joined: Aug 19, 2013

Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#1 » by 1AndDone » Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:45 pm

Assuming the draft order stays true, what could the Lakers get for the #6 pick?
User avatar
crosko42
Starter
Posts: 2,198
And1: 681
Joined: Feb 16, 2010

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#2 » by crosko42 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:04 pm

Rondo
Image
User avatar
Viper1500
Head Coach
Posts: 6,830
And1: 2,702
Joined: Apr 15, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
   

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#3 » by Viper1500 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:22 pm

Afflalo+12 for Nash+6th?
Saul Goodman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,671
And1: 2,367
Joined: Feb 27, 2013
         

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#4 » by Saul Goodman » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:29 pm

Nash/#6 for Rondo seems to make the most sense. Nash/#6 for Milsap if Atlanta wants to blow it up?
2016 GMAT Blazers

Howard/Nene/
Griffin/M.Leonard/T.Jones
Porter/Marc.Morris/J.Johnson
McCollum/Stauskas/Thompson/Seldon
Lillard/Bayless/DeColo
User avatar
packforfreedom
Analyst
Posts: 3,275
And1: 4,020
Joined: Nov 06, 2012
 

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#5 » by packforfreedom » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:37 pm

not Kevin Love.
Smitty731
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,364
And1: 24,662
Joined: Feb 09, 2014
       

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#6 » by Smitty731 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:49 pm

Rondo, in my opinion, is worth more than 6 in this draft. He's still fairly young, on a good deal, and without him it means the Celtics are in a full scale rebuild. I don't think they are going that route. I think they are going to try to add pieces and contend.
User avatar
Viper1500
Head Coach
Posts: 6,830
And1: 2,702
Joined: Apr 15, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
   

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#7 » by Viper1500 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:50 pm

I wouldn't trade Rondo for Smart/Vonleh if I were Boston.
Narf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 880
Joined: Sep 05, 2009

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#8 » by Narf » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:57 pm

For the #5 pick to get Exum....along with I don't know what.

Boston wants to contend they say, so be it. Throw one of those overpaid role players to LA for #6 and a 2nd and get better value contracts with cap space.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 85,797
And1: 88,808
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#9 » by Texas Chuck » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:08 pm

Smitty731 wrote:Rondo, in my opinion, is worth more than 6 in this draft. He's still fairly young, on a good deal, and without him it means the Celtics are in a full scale rebuild. I don't think they are going that route. I think they are going to try to add pieces and contend.


he has a year left on his deal. Extended you can make that argument, but Im not sure he's even worth the #6 if there's a risk he walks and I always value veterans more than picks.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Smitty731
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,364
And1: 24,662
Joined: Feb 09, 2014
       

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#10 » by Smitty731 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:13 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
Smitty731 wrote:Rondo, in my opinion, is worth more than 6 in this draft. He's still fairly young, on a good deal, and without him it means the Celtics are in a full scale rebuild. I don't think they are going that route. I think they are going to try to add pieces and contend.


he has a year left on his deal. Extended you can make that argument, but Im not sure he's even worth the #6 if there's a risk he walks and I always value veterans more than picks.


I probably should have been more clear. By good deal, I meant he isn't an overpaid veteran. At 12.9, I feel he is very fairly compensated.

I agree with you point too. At least with veterans you know what you have. Not saying I wouldn't consider dealing Rondo if it meant Wiggins or Parker (maybe Embiid, but the back scares me). Beyond that, I'm not doing it. Not without other pieces coming back too. And Nash doesn't count, as sad as that is.
LApwnd
Banned User
Posts: 20,606
And1: 1,146
Joined: Jul 09, 2008

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#11 » by LApwnd » Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:25 pm

Viper1500 wrote:Afflalo+12 for Nash+6th?


why? :-?
1AndDone
Sophomore
Posts: 224
And1: 5
Joined: Aug 19, 2013

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#12 » by 1AndDone » Thu Apr 24, 2014 12:03 am

Interesting responses so far.

I was looking at the trade history of picks 5-7 over the past 10 years or so. Here's what we have:

2004: Mavs trade Antawn Jamison for #5 (Harris), Stackhouse and Laettner
2007: Sonics trade Ray Allen and #34 (Baby) to BOS for #5 (Green), Szczerbiak and West
2009: Wolves trade Mike Miller/Randy Foye to WAS for #5 (Rubio), Thomas, Songalia and Pecherov

Though the sample size is small and two of the three trades involved Ernie Grunfeld, there is a loose standard:

a) getting back a recent all-star or two top-8 rotation players
b) unloading a bad contract (Nash in this case) in the process
1AndDone
Sophomore
Posts: 224
And1: 5
Joined: Aug 19, 2013

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#13 » by 1AndDone » Thu Apr 24, 2014 12:05 am

Taj Gibson and Jimmy Butler? Chicago would likely target Smart or Vonleh with #6.
LApwnd
Banned User
Posts: 20,606
And1: 1,146
Joined: Jul 09, 2008

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#14 » by LApwnd » Thu Apr 24, 2014 12:27 am

trading the 6th pick for average players or non star players that affect 2014 and 2015 cap room is a NON starter.
1AndDone
Sophomore
Posts: 224
And1: 5
Joined: Aug 19, 2013

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#15 » by 1AndDone » Thu Apr 24, 2014 12:47 am

LApwnd wrote:trading the 6th pick for average players or non star players that affect 2014 and 2015 cap room is a NON starter.


OK so if the Lakers keep the pick then how are they going to make the playoffs next year?
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 10,821
And1: 3,360
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#16 » by pipfan » Thu Apr 24, 2014 1:04 am

Drose?
hege53190
Head Coach
Posts: 7,334
And1: 2,671
Joined: Nov 29, 2001

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#17 » by hege53190 » Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:01 am

Posted this on the Bucks board:

Bucks trade: Knight, Henson, Middleton, Wolters, Raduljica, #31, #36, 2015#1 top 10 protected

LA trades: Nash, #6

Before you guys trash it LA right now has 4 players under contract for 36.5 after the draft they will have 5 players for 40.5. They don't have to just fill out the roster they need to fill out the roster with guys that can play.

After this trade they have 10 guys under contract for about $34.5 leaving 28.5 million for 2 players.

Say they go after Anthony starting at 20 million and Gortat at 8.5 million.

A lineup of
Marshall
Kobe
Carmelo
Henson
Gortat

Bench of
Knight
Middleton
Wolters
Raduljica
Sacre
#31
#36


actually gives them a chance to compete next year. And if Kobe comes back healthy, a darkhorse shot at the title. One thing is for sure. If LA is planning on competing next year they need to get some talented cheap talent.
rugbyrugger23
RealGM
Posts: 10,243
And1: 1,336
Joined: Jun 07, 2011

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#18 » by rugbyrugger23 » Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:07 am

Horford.

Ideally a third team gets Nash and Atlanta gets a center.

Atlanta gets Lakers pick and a true center for Horford.

Gasol (re-signed 2 year deal)
Horford
?
Bryant
?

Decent start before free agency kicks in.
cammac
General Manager
Posts: 8,757
And1: 6,216
Joined: Aug 02, 2013
Location: Niagara Peninsula
         

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#19 » by cammac » Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:23 am

Would consider DeRozan for 6th and that assumes Smart is available. No Nash
LAL getting a young all star on a great contract.

Trade 6th to Detroit for 8th & 38th and the right to exchange 1sts. in 2016.
Trade 8th, 37th & 38th to Phoenix for 14th, 18th & 27th.
1AndDone
Sophomore
Posts: 224
And1: 5
Joined: Aug 19, 2013

Re: Lakers trade #6 for... 

Post#20 » by 1AndDone » Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:08 am

hege53190 wrote:Posted this on the Bucks board:

Bucks trade: Knight, Henson, Middleton, Wolters, Raduljica, #31, #36, 2015#1 top 10 protected

LA trades: Nash, #6

Before you guys trash it LA right now has 4 players under contract for 36.5 after the draft they will have 5 players for 40.5. They don't have to just fill out the roster they need to fill out the roster with guys that can play.

After this trade they have 10 guys under contract for about $34.5 leaving 28.5 million for 2 players.

Say they go after Anthony starting at 20 million and Gortat at 8.5 million.

A lineup of
Marshall
Kobe
Carmelo
Henson
Gortat

Bench of
Knight
Middleton
Wolters
Raduljica
Sacre
#31
#36


actually gives them a chance to compete next year. And if Kobe comes back healthy, a darkhorse shot at the title. One thing is for sure. If LA is planning on competing next year they need to get some talented cheap talent.



I like your idea. The Lakers need to think outside the box with this pick (unless they land in the top 3) because w/ Kobe making $24million, filling roster spots will be tough. Next to Kobe, Knight and Henson would be improved. All hinges on them getting Melo. Pretty good team if it all panned out. This is an easy trade for the Bucks.

Return to Trades and Transactions