Tristan Thompson for....
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
- JDR720
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 42,285
- And1: 43,039
- Joined: Jul 09, 2013
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
Charlotte could use him, but not for Bismack, Charlotte needs a rim protector also with Al and Cody (or Marvin Williams) starting
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,464
- And1: 32,089
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
youngthegiant wrote:LOL Kanter has proven a lot more than Biyombojbk1234 wrote:I'd have tepid interest in a TT for Biyombo trade. That's it. I don't know why people keep suggesting Kanter for the Cavs. He's exactly what they don't need.
He hasn't proven that he can defend which is all the Cavs need out of the 5 spot.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,512
- And1: 7,091
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
- Location: Columbus, OH
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
Tristan Thompson can't even defend 4s. Now Cavs fans expect he'll do fine as a backup C???? LOL. You can't be serious. And Cleveland's front office realizes it needs another legit C.
Thompson may have been the 4th pick in the draft a few years back but he's a poor rebounder, kills spacing offensively and is a bad defender. The Cavs would be smart to deal him while he still has value because outside of a 10-12 minute backup to Love, he serves little use to the current roster.
Thompson may have been the 4th pick in the draft a few years back but he's a poor rebounder, kills spacing offensively and is a bad defender. The Cavs would be smart to deal him while he still has value because outside of a 10-12 minute backup to Love, he serves little use to the current roster.
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,464
- And1: 32,089
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
Dat2U wrote:Tristan Thompson can't even defend 4s. Now Cavs fans expect he'll do fine as a backup C???? LOL. You can't be serious. And Cleveland's front office realizes it needs another legit C.
Thompson may have been the 4th pick in the draft a few years back but he's a poor rebounder, kills spacing offensively and is a bad defender. The Cavs would be smart to deal him while he still has value because outside of a 10-12 minute backup to Love, he serves little use to the current roster.
How many rebounds did TT average last year?
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
- CBFAlex
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,160
- And1: 69
- Joined: Dec 01, 2013
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
though hes undersized he seems to play fine at Center, I wouldnt move him unless you get a real good offer. I am afraid he will get overpaid next you though
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
- CBFAlex
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,160
- And1: 69
- Joined: Dec 01, 2013
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
jbk1234 wrote:Dat2U wrote:Tristan Thompson can't even defend 4s. Now Cavs fans expect he'll do fine as a backup C???? LOL. You can't be serious. And Cleveland's front office realizes it needs another legit C.
Thompson may have been the 4th pick in the draft a few years back but he's a poor rebounder, kills spacing offensively and is a bad defender. The Cavs would be smart to deal him while he still has value because outside of a 10-12 minute backup to Love, he serves little use to the current roster.
How is he a poor rebounder, anytime he starts he get atleast 10, I would call him a top notch rebounder, true he isnt a good scorer but does play decent defense, so please dont comment if you have no idea what your talking about
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,464
- And1: 32,089
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
CBFAlex wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Dat2U wrote:Tristan Thompson can't even defend 4s. Now Cavs fans expect he'll do fine as a backup C???? LOL. You can't be serious. And Cleveland's front office realizes it needs another legit C.
Thompson may have been the 4th pick in the draft a few years back but he's a poor rebounder, kills spacing offensively and is a bad defender. The Cavs would be smart to deal him while he still has value because outside of a 10-12 minute backup to Love, he serves little use to the current roster.
How is he a poor rebounder, anytime he starts he get atleast 10, I would call him a top notch rebounder, true he isnt a good scorer but does play decent defense, so please dont comment if you have no idea what your talking about
Wasn't my post. I think you responded to the wrong guy.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,630
- And1: 211
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
what about something like Thompson and unguarenteeds (murphy and lucas) for Olynyk and Bogans
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 118
- And1: 11
- Joined: Dec 02, 2013
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
Not for Thompson but Philly has Henry Sims and Jarvis Vanado, both of whom would be decent frontcourt depth. Can't imagine they'd want very much for either at this point.
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,464
- And1: 32,089
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
bgrep14 wrote:what about something like Thompson and unguarenteeds (murphy and lucas) for Olynyk and Bogans
Absolute no. TT is a better center than Olynk.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,464
- And1: 32,089
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
Phil_E_Moose wrote:Not for Thompson but Philly has Henry Sims and Jarvis Vanado, both of whom would be decent frontcourt depth. Can't imagine they'd want very much for either at this point.
Sad part is that I'd probably give Philly an expiring and another second to get Sims back.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,259
- And1: 3,930
- Joined: May 11, 2002
- Location: Just outside of No where.
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
jowglenn wrote:
1 A backup (and sometimes starting) center. Varejao is chronically injured, despite being a 13/13 solid guy when healthy. You MUST have a backup center, and it ain't Brendan Haywood - he's been on fumes for years already. You must have a backup center in the NBA, people; if Anderson Varejao is your starter, you MUST MUST MUST have a backup center.
So Whassup? Of the Prozac again?
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
- HornetJail
- RealGM
- Posts: 44,466
- And1: 12,532
- Joined: Feb 05, 2012
- Location: within Mark Williams' reach
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
jbk1234 wrote:I'd have tepid interest in a TT for Biyombo trade. That's it. I don't know why people keep suggesting Kanter for the Cavs. He's exactly what they don't need.
Zero interest at all.
Counter:
Zeller for Thompson.
formerly KEMBAtheMETEOR
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
- bigmean
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,803
- And1: 133
- Joined: Nov 19, 2001
- Location: Yardley, Pa
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
Nets trades: Joe Johnson, Kevin Garnett Cory Jefferson
Nets receives: Wilson Chandler, Tristan Thomspon, JJ Hickson, Tayshaun Prince
Cavs trades: Tristan Thompson
Cavs receives: Darrell Arthur, Kosta Koufos
Nuggets trades: Darrel Arthur, Randy Foye, Wilson Chandler, JJ Hickson
Nuggets receives: Joe Johnson Cory Jefferson,
Grizzlies trades: Kosta Koufos, Tayshaun Prince
Grizzlies receives: Randy Foye, Kevin Garnett
Nets get some depth on the bench, Thompson gets starting power forward, I like Thompson/Teletovic/Lopez/Hickson/Plumlee at the bigs, that's a lot of beef in the east they also save 10 million in cap space. Prince/hickson/thompson are expiring deals
Cavs gets two very good backup for thompson, all about depth here
Nuggets liquidate there bench for joe johnson, a very efficient player, I love making Gallinari a sixth man, Jefferson could be another faried (but unlikely)
Grizzlies gets a combo guard in foye and KG to backup ZBO/Gasol
Nets receives: Wilson Chandler, Tristan Thomspon, JJ Hickson, Tayshaun Prince
Cavs trades: Tristan Thompson
Cavs receives: Darrell Arthur, Kosta Koufos
Nuggets trades: Darrel Arthur, Randy Foye, Wilson Chandler, JJ Hickson
Nuggets receives: Joe Johnson Cory Jefferson,
Grizzlies trades: Kosta Koufos, Tayshaun Prince
Grizzlies receives: Randy Foye, Kevin Garnett
Nets get some depth on the bench, Thompson gets starting power forward, I like Thompson/Teletovic/Lopez/Hickson/Plumlee at the bigs, that's a lot of beef in the east they also save 10 million in cap space. Prince/hickson/thompson are expiring deals
Cavs gets two very good backup for thompson, all about depth here
Nuggets liquidate there bench for joe johnson, a very efficient player, I love making Gallinari a sixth man, Jefferson could be another faried (but unlikely)
Grizzlies gets a combo guard in foye and KG to backup ZBO/Gasol
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,464
- And1: 32,089
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Tristan Thompson for....
BizGilwalker wrote:jbk1234 wrote:I'd have tepid interest in a TT for Biyombo trade. That's it. I don't know why people keep suggesting Kanter for the Cavs. He's exactly what they don't need.
Zero interest at all.
Counter:
Zeller for Thompson.
Less than zero interest in the counter.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Return to Trades and Transactions