Celtics/Lakers

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

Bentley1225
RealGM
Posts: 13,332
And1: 1,562
Joined: Jan 10, 2007

Celtics/Lakers 

Post#1 » by Bentley1225 » Fri Oct 24, 2014 3:03 pm

This idea is based on the following:

-Nash is out for season, Nick Young is hurt
-Bynum is being shopped
-Celtics have lots of young players and forth coming draft picks, Lakers do not.

As a result, ill offer this idea.

To Boston
-Steve Nash (waive)

To Los Angeles:
-Will Bynum
-Gerald Wallace
-2015 Los Angeles Clippers 1st round pick (projected 24-30)
-2016 Cleveland Cavs 1st round pick (projected 24-30)


Allows Boston to clear another $10 million off the books for next off-season for greater flexibility. Frees up minutes for younger players at the 1 and 3 spots.

Lakers get short term backup point guard and backup SF in Wallace while adding to draft pick cupboard for an eventual re-build after Kobe Bryant era.
Smitty731
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,364
And1: 24,662
Joined: Feb 09, 2014
       

Re: Celtics/Lakers 

Post#2 » by Smitty731 » Fri Oct 24, 2014 3:10 pm

I'm assuming the two picks are to eat each year of Wallace's deal? The Celtics shouldn't trade a pick to dump Bynum. They should either eat his contract, or keep him and eat a smaller deal.

I wouldn't trade two firsts to dump Wallace in a deal where nothing comes back. A first and a second maybe. The Celtics aren't quite that desperate for space.

Nash for Wallace and a pick is fine to me.
User avatar
Higgs Boston
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,854
And1: 2,625
Joined: Feb 25, 2014

Re: Celtics/Lakers 

Post#3 » by Higgs Boston » Fri Oct 24, 2014 3:22 pm

Two rounds for cut 10 millions of wallace contract? you think nash contract is inexistent thing? you think that have 1 year of injured nash is better than 1 year of wallace?
Boston haven't necessity of dump wallace contract, and less in a trade for nash or other useless players.
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 40,937
And1: 14,073
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek

Re: Celtics/Lakers 

Post#4 » by Laimbeer » Fri Oct 24, 2014 3:25 pm

Smitty731 wrote:I'm assuming the two picks are to eat each year of Wallace's deal? The Celtics shouldn't trade a pick to dump Bynum. They should either eat his contract, or keep him and eat a smaller deal.

I wouldn't trade two firsts to dump Wallace in a deal where nothing comes back. A first and a second maybe. The Celtics aren't quite that desperate for space.

Nash for Wallace and a pick is fine to me.


Lakers are actually only eating one year with Nash's bad deal going out.

It's a buyer's market for cap space and the Lakers would be lucky to get one first in this deal.
Bentley1225
RealGM
Posts: 13,332
And1: 1,562
Joined: Jan 10, 2007

Re: Celtics/Lakers 

Post#5 » by Bentley1225 » Fri Oct 24, 2014 3:31 pm

Smitty731 wrote:I'm assuming the two picks are to eat each year of Wallace's deal? The Celtics shouldn't trade a pick to dump Bynum. They should either eat his contract, or keep him and eat a smaller deal.

I wouldn't trade two firsts to dump Wallace in a deal where nothing comes back. A first and a second maybe. The Celtics aren't quite that desperate for space.

Nash for Wallace and a pick is fine to me.


It really comes down to do the Celtics value the roster opening now and $10 million in flexibility next summer or 2 late 1st round picks in successive years?
Smitty731
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,364
And1: 24,662
Joined: Feb 09, 2014
       

Re: Celtics/Lakers 

Post#6 » by Smitty731 » Fri Oct 24, 2014 3:38 pm

Bentley1225 wrote:
Smitty731 wrote:I'm assuming the two picks are to eat each year of Wallace's deal? The Celtics shouldn't trade a pick to dump Bynum. They should either eat his contract, or keep him and eat a smaller deal.

I wouldn't trade two firsts to dump Wallace in a deal where nothing comes back. A first and a second maybe. The Celtics aren't quite that desperate for space.

Nash for Wallace and a pick is fine to me.


It really comes down to do the Celtics value the roster opening now and $10 million in flexibility next summer or 2 late 1st round picks in successive years?


I'll take the picks. The Celtics should have enough Cap space to do what they want next summer with or without Wallace. And I don't think they are that desperate to keep a guy this year that they need the roster space. Dumping a pick is fine. Dumping two firsts, even if they are late, is a bit steep for me.
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 13,709
And1: 5,255
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: Celtics/Lakers 

Post#7 » by skywalker33 » Fri Oct 24, 2014 4:55 pm

BOS should keep their picks,,,,,,
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
Bentley1225
RealGM
Posts: 13,332
And1: 1,562
Joined: Jan 10, 2007

Re: Celtics/Lakers 

Post#8 » by Bentley1225 » Fri Oct 24, 2014 6:50 pm

Well they have Smart, Bradley, Young, Turner, Sullinger, Zeller, Olynyk, Faverani, Powell, 2015 1st pick (likely lottery). I think with those 10 roster spots accounted for, what impact will 2 late 1st round picks have vs. $4 million in savings this season and $10 million in savings this off-season.
User avatar
username_taken
Veteran
Posts: 2,775
And1: 2,412
Joined: Aug 23, 2014
Location: Massachusetts
       

Re: Celtics/Lakers 

Post#9 » by username_taken » Fri Oct 24, 2014 6:55 pm

I'd keep the picks. I don't believe Nash can be traded either since he's injured.
rickrolled
Head Coach
Posts: 6,453
And1: 2,652
Joined: Nov 12, 2011

Re: Celtics/Lakers 

Post#10 » by rickrolled » Fri Oct 24, 2014 7:04 pm

username_taken wrote:I'd keep the picks. I don't believe Nash can be traded either since he's injured.


yes he could, the team that gets him waives the physical.

Return to Trades and Transactions