J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

sfballa13 · Post #21 » by **sfballa13** » Fri Oct 31, 2014 2:49 am

JR Smith, Bargnani
for
Josh Smith, Datome

teerfour+40LG · Post #22 » by **teerfour+40LG** » Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:08 am

I think Jason Thompson would be a decent fit in NYK, and I would definitely trade him for JR Smith . . . unfortunately.

Although I'd prefer to turn Jason Thompson into Josh Smith rather than JR Smith.

eathb_au · Post #23 » by **eathb_au** » Fri Oct 31, 2014 1:18 pm

JaVale McGee

Golabki · Post #24 » by **Golabki** » Fri Oct 31, 2014 2:10 pm

So, I'm pretty sure I've got the correct answer...

Jason Terry for JR

Moray has always been a "talent first" guy and Smith would certainly be a scary addition to the Rockets bench from a talent perspective, giving them a much needed scorer to replace Lin. Morary wins.

NYK does it because they cut a year off a bad deal and get rid of a headache. Jackson wins.

JR experiences death by strangulation at the hands McHale during a meaningless game in mid-Feburary. McHale wins.

McHale is sentenced to the death penalty by an overly punitive Texas jury. Houston fans win.

It's a Win-Win-Win-Win

sportscrazy · Post #25 » by **sportscrazy** » Wed Dec 3, 2014 9:49 pm

Bump.. Anything new after a month?

BadWolf · Post #26 » by **BadWolf** » Wed Dec 3, 2014 10:29 pm

Rockazoids wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Maybe the Kings for Landry?

Boston for Wallace?

Nets for Jarrett Jack?

Why would they want 3yrs of Landry $6.5 M when they get the same form Acy for $9 K?
Why would NY trade a $6 M 1yr &(PO)JR for a $10 M 2yrs of Wallace?
Why would want 3yrs of Jack with Calderon on board for 3yr?

kings might do t
boston wouldn't do it
nets wouldn't do it

didn't realize it's one month old

Post #27 » by **Scoot McGroot** » Wed Dec 3, 2014 11:50 pm

sportscrazy wrote:Bump.. Anything new after a month?

Can't imagine it. The issues with JR are really never going to change. Add in the fact that he can't hit shots so far this year, and it's not going to get any better.

Post #28 » by **bondom34** » Thu Dec 4, 2014 12:09 am

sportscrazy wrote:Bump.. Anything new after a month?

He's played some. Is sick. And hasn't played particularly well. So either no (if there was no interest) or interest has dwindled.

blind prophet · Post #29 » by **blind prophet** » Thu Dec 4, 2014 12:58 am

sportscrazy wrote:Bump.. Anything new after a month?

Kings now say no to Thompson for him.

HornetJail · Post #30 » by **HornetJail** » Thu Dec 4, 2014 2:43 am

Gerald Wallace, Joe Johnson, or any other salary dump. NY would have to match salaries with either Bargs or Stoudemire though

Saul Goodman · Post #31 » by **Saul Goodman** » Thu Dec 4, 2014 4:46 am

I still think the Knicks should send Shumpert/Calderon/Smith/Acy all together to a contender looking to acquire a bench. Portland for Robinson/Wright/Freeland/Leonard or Smith/Shump/Jose for Tayshaun Prince/Pondexter

Post #32 » by **City of Trees** » Thu Dec 4, 2014 6:34 am

skflives wrote:I wouldn't mind Jason Thompson.

Kings would mind I'm sure

Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app

RSCD3_ · Post #33 » by **RSCD3_** » Thu Dec 4, 2014 12:41 pm

His chucking has certainly gone down so I would think value would increase a bit from the " this guy will never get it " perspective

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Post #34 » by **Scoot McGroot** » Fri Dec 5, 2014 12:21 am

RSCD3_ wrote:His chucking has certainly gone down so I would think value would increase a bit from the " this guy will never get it " perspective

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Only really because his minutes have gone down under Fisher. Add in that he's shooting at essentially the lowest point of his career, and you could still consider him "chucking".

J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one

Re: J.R. Smith (by himself) for any one