ChuckDurn wrote:nykballa2k4 wrote:californiadude wrote:
This is more like it. Pretty much how I feel except it's 10 times more eloquent/clear cut than I could ever hope to write
http://www.rotoworld.com/recent/nba/1049/andre-iguodalaThere is an "internal debate" about the best way to use Andre Iguodala (knee tendinitis) this season, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.
Per the SF Chronicle, "there's internal debate about whether it’s better to play Iguodala about 25 minutes per game 75 times or about 35 minutes per game 50 times." Iguodala is expected to begin the season in a sixth man role behind Harrison Barnes, but he's been lukewarm about embracing the role so far.
With that bolded part the best deal I can think of is Iguodala for McGee.
Everyone in GS knows Bogut and/or lee will be injured come playoff time. McGee can fill a need at center.
If McGee is not to anyone's liking, then GS can use the Simmons deal as part of it where McGee goes to BOS and maybe instead of picks being involved(CLE pick) BOS can send one of their guys that does not project into being a starter (looking at you Kelly or Zeller) or maybe a combo deal (Faverini, Bass)
here it is in the checker:
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=lnds2r8
I could see GS adding a pick to sweeten the pot for BOS but overall seems about right. If boston wants McGee they want to play him. Only one of Zeller/Kelly is going to get playing time other than that.
Let me get this straight..... the Warriors would trade Iguodala and a draft pick, to get Gerald Wallace and Olynyk?
Doubtful.
Not only that but I doubt Denver's going to want iggy back after Karl called him a rat.