WHY FOR THE NETS?
1) They get a needed backup PG in Lin, and shave some money off of next's years cap/tax.
WHY FOR THE LAKERS?
1) They get a look at Brook Lopez for the next 1.5 years as their center.
Simple trade: Brook for Jordan Hill+Lin
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
Simple trade: Brook for Jordan Hill+Lin
-
mhd
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,334
- And1: 1,447
- Joined: Mar 25, 2004
Re: Simple trade: Brook for Jordan Hill+Lin
-
shagadelic45
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,409
- And1: 85
- Joined: Nov 20, 2001
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
Re: Simple trade: Brook for Jordan Hill+Lin
replace lin with nash
Simple trade: Brook for Jordan Hill+Lin
-
PICKnPOP
- Sophomore
- Posts: 128
- And1: 39
- Joined: Nov 06, 2014
-
Simple trade: Brook for Jordan Hill+Lin
I'm sure the lakers wouldn't mind this swap. Lin is as good as gone at the end of the season anyways.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Simple trade: Brook for Jordan Hill+Lin
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,514
- And1: 32,121
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Simple trade: Brook for Jordan Hill+Lin
I like it for both teams. Lakers still have all their cap space in 2016.
Edit: You could even expand this to include OKC. Hill goes there. Perkins goes to Brooklyn. Lopez (and maybe Lamb) go to L.A.
Edit: You could even expand this to include OKC. Hill goes there. Perkins goes to Brooklyn. Lopez (and maybe Lamb) go to L.A.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Return to Trades and Transactions