Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,590
- And1: 50,209
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
Seems odd for a guy who made winning plays to have his team be over 6 points per 100 better when he's on the bench.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,764
- And1: 11,060
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
Curmudgeon wrote:Turner made game winning plays. It's not about talent-- they all have talent. It's about production, and Turner does what it takes to win games. Everyone hates him except people like me who have a single-minded almost pathological love of winning. I don't care about stats, style points, PER or any of that extraneous noise.
Except, looking at him with no bias, Turner should be a guy you despise. He loses his teams game more than he wins them.
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
- old rem
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,753
- And1: 1,080
- Joined: Jun 14, 2005
- Location: Witness Protection
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
Huh? the Wolves do okay..Boston gets hosed.Note30 wrote:No way the Wolves do this.
CENSORED... No comment.
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,860
- And1: 21,863
- Joined: Jan 20, 2004
- Location: Boston, MA
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
bondom34 wrote:Seems odd for a guy who made winning plays to have his team be over 6 points per 100 better when he's on the bench.
He plays against the other team's first unit. He made at least three huge plays to win games during the second half last year, and hit another big shot to send a game into overtime against the Wizards (which the Celtics everntually lost).
His career stats, or what he did in Philly or Indiana, are irrelevant.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,590
- And1: 50,209
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
Curmudgeon wrote:bondom34 wrote:Seems odd for a guy who made winning plays to have his team be over 6 points per 100 better when he's on the bench.
He plays against the other team's first unit. He made at least three huge plays to win games during the second half last year, and hit another big shot to send a game into overtime against the Wizards (which the Celtics everntually lost).
His career stats, or what he did in Philly or Indiana, are irrelevant.
I can literally say the same thing about Dion Waiters.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
- bwgood77
- Global Mod
- Posts: 93,739
- And1: 57,448
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
I don't like this for Phx. Sullinger isn't a good fit on the Suns.
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,764
- And1: 11,060
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
Curmudgeon wrote:His career stats, or what he did in Philly or Indiana, are irrelevant.
It's immensely relevant when he's being pitched in trades to other teams.
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,190
- And1: 362
- Joined: Jun 18, 2010
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
jbk1234 wrote:spearsy23 wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Yeah the Wolves don't consider this. Maybe if Dieng was included, and sent to the Celtics, instead.
Unless I'm mistaken Minny LOVES Dieng.
After drafting Towns, I suspect that they are higher on Shabazz. In any event, I'm not sure the Wolves should be taking Markieff on such a young roster.
Sounds like the Wolves were getting calls about Deing on draft night and weren't interested in moving him. Wolves seem content with the pieces they have in place outside of potentially moving Bennett.
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,860
- And1: 21,863
- Joined: Jan 20, 2004
- Location: Boston, MA
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
Scoot McGroot wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:His career stats, or what he did in Philly or Indiana, are irrelevant.
It's immensely relevant when he's being pitched in trades to other teams.
Yes, which is why, like Sullinger, Turner's basketball value is substantially higher than his trader value. It makes the most sense to keep those kind of players.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,764
- And1: 11,060
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
Curmudgeon wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:His career stats, or what he did in Philly or Indiana, are irrelevant.
It's immensely relevant when he's being pitched in trades to other teams.
Yes, which is why, like Sullinger, Turner's basketball value is substantially higher than his trader value. It makes the most sense to keep those kind of players.
I agree. If Boston can eke anything out of Turner, that alone is immensely more worthwhile than anything Turner could, and should, net in trade.
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,113
- And1: 367
- Joined: Jun 10, 2005
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
Shabazz worth a lot more to Minny than Morris and Turner.
Minny loves:
Rubio at pg
Wiggins at sg/sf
Shabazz at sf
Towns at pf/c
Dieng at C
Garnett - just because he is KG
Not in love with:
KMart
Pekovic
Bennett
AMiller
Some like for:
Payne
Lavine
Tyus Jones
Personally, I think they need a guy like Porzingis to groom at pf and they are set for the next few years. But, right now they are developing a bunch of guys (Wiggins/Shabazz/Dieng/Tyus/Lavine/Payne/Bennett/Towns), letting some heal (Pek), and hoping vets can contribute (KMart/Rubio).
Due to their own high draft spots and the wealth CLE gave for KLove, they are talent rich on rookie contracts. They are where Philly wishes it was (except Philly would not have KMart, Rubio and Pek).
Minny dream trade is to ship quantity like KMart/Bennett/Pek and possibly others (AMiller/LaVine/Tyus/Payne) for a quality young player or two (Russell/Randle/Noel/Porzingis/Jabari/Oladipo) or even a veteran stud (Beal/Horford/etc.) But, those deals are hard to make. I think they are in the wait another year mode: let KG play a little while young guys develop and figure out exactly what they have with Dieng/Pek/Shabazz. Then, next off season, KMarts' expiring, a top 12 pick, and a couple of the young guys might get them another stud.
Or, maybe at the trade deadline, LA or NY decide to make a push and give up a stud (Porzingis/Russell/Randle) to make it happen. I know that is unlikely - but it would be interesting.
Minny loves:
Rubio at pg
Wiggins at sg/sf
Shabazz at sf
Towns at pf/c
Dieng at C
Garnett - just because he is KG
Not in love with:
KMart
Pekovic
Bennett
AMiller
Some like for:
Payne
Lavine
Tyus Jones
Personally, I think they need a guy like Porzingis to groom at pf and they are set for the next few years. But, right now they are developing a bunch of guys (Wiggins/Shabazz/Dieng/Tyus/Lavine/Payne/Bennett/Towns), letting some heal (Pek), and hoping vets can contribute (KMart/Rubio).
Due to their own high draft spots and the wealth CLE gave for KLove, they are talent rich on rookie contracts. They are where Philly wishes it was (except Philly would not have KMart, Rubio and Pek).
Minny dream trade is to ship quantity like KMart/Bennett/Pek and possibly others (AMiller/LaVine/Tyus/Payne) for a quality young player or two (Russell/Randle/Noel/Porzingis/Jabari/Oladipo) or even a veteran stud (Beal/Horford/etc.) But, those deals are hard to make. I think they are in the wait another year mode: let KG play a little while young guys develop and figure out exactly what they have with Dieng/Pek/Shabazz. Then, next off season, KMarts' expiring, a top 12 pick, and a couple of the young guys might get them another stud.
Or, maybe at the trade deadline, LA or NY decide to make a push and give up a stud (Porzingis/Russell/Randle) to make it happen. I know that is unlikely - but it would be interesting.
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
-
- Forum Mod - Pacers
- Posts: 15,072
- And1: 6,584
- Joined: Sep 26, 2006
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
Curmudgeon wrote:His career stats, or what he did in Philly or Indiana, are irrelevant.
4 full years of data is certainly relevant, especially when the rest of the data is his lone year with Boston. The only real difference in his numbers from last year and every year prior is that he assisted more and turned the ball over more. Everything else was right in line with his career stats.
He made some big shots for Philly and us too, but those were few and far between and he consistently gave up more than he produced. JR Smith has made some big plays in his career too, but that doesn't make him a winning player. You can't discount the other 47 minutes of the game.
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 21,364
- And1: 24,662
- Joined: Feb 09, 2014
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
I like Turner to an extent. His contract is fair and he was good for Boston last year. Especially once he took over as the de facto PG. But he's not a great trade asset or anything. He's just a decent player.
That said the difference in Muhammad and Turner isn't enough to offset the chasm between Sullinger and Bennett. Sullinger, while far from great, has proven to be a useful NBA player. Bennett hasn't proven he has any NBA future at all.
That said the difference in Muhammad and Turner isn't enough to offset the chasm between Sullinger and Bennett. Sullinger, while far from great, has proven to be a useful NBA player. Bennett hasn't proven he has any NBA future at all.
Check out my NBA Salary and Roster sheets: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1T2Eg_zvqNqQD_5TpE4Ns6xhElatXdLpYG1roZtRLyvE/edit?usp=sharing
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,848
- And1: 14,812
- Joined: May 21, 2010
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
I don't like it for the Suns.
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,531
- And1: 32,125
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
pacers33granger wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:His career stats, or what he did in Philly or Indiana, are irrelevant.
4 full years of data is certainly relevant, especially when the rest of the data is his lone year with Boston. The only real difference in his numbers from last year and every year prior is that he assisted more and turned the ball over more. Everything else was right in line with his career stats.
He made some big shots for Philly and us too, but those were few and far between and he consistently gave up more than he produced. JR Smith has made some big plays in his career too, but that doesn't make him a winning player. You can't discount the other 47 minutes of the game.
Enough about Game 6 already we're trying to get over it.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
- RealityIsDemar
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,122
- And1: 1,164
- Joined: Mar 30, 2014
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
Really, really, really, really, really, realllllllllllly bad for the Wolves.
Shoutout to Bruno Skull for the sig
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
- NashtyNas
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,259
- And1: 1,887
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
So the C's give up the least value and get the most?
How is Shabazz going to Boston and not Phoenix? Makes very little sense.
Regardless, Minny doesn't touch it.
How is Shabazz going to Boston and not Phoenix? Makes very little sense.
Regardless, Minny doesn't touch it.
The underappreciated greats:
Some seek fame cause they need validation, some say hating is confused admiration - Nasty, nasty Nas
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,217
- And1: 10,097
- Joined: Mar 03, 2011
- Location: Boston Garden
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
This doesnt solve any issues for Boston. We have a huge log jam at PF right now, and I like Shabazz more than Turner, but I don't see Boston taking back both Shabazz and Bennett if we are giving up Sully and Turner.
Just doesnt solve anything for us and thats my real issue here, i dont think this conversation ever really begins.
Just doesnt solve anything for us and thats my real issue here, i dont think this conversation ever really begins.
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
- AQuintus
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,425
- And1: 2,458
- Joined: Jan 10, 2008
- Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
Re: Boston/Minnesota/Phoenix
jbk1234 wrote:After drafting Towns, I suspect that they are higher on Shabazz.
Minnesota is high on both. Dieng will be Towns' backup at C, and Shabazz will be Wiggins' backup at SF. There's no reason to trade either, especially not for a couple of headcases.
Return to Trades and Transactions