How Good is this Bulls' Team?
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,810
- And1: 3,355
- Joined: Aug 07, 2010
How Good is this Bulls' Team?
Assume Noah and Gasol walk
1. Bulls go all in and make a huge offer to Barnes. Obviously, he will be overpaid, but we REALLY need an athletic 3 who can shoot, and GS might let him walk in hopes of getting KD. We have the connection with him (Iowa HS with McDermott-same HS as Hoiberg).
2. I figure Taj has positive value, Dunleavy more or less neutral and Calderon negative value-if we could dump all 3 of them, burning only second round picks if necessary, we would have lots more cap space. Lots of teams would want Taj, and give up a first of some sort. Teams might take Dunleavy as a bench shooter for a year. Calderon is a good back up PG, but over paid.
3. Sign Conley to a big deal
Bulls end up with
Conley/Moore/Grant
Butler/Valentine/Moore/Snell
Barnes/Dougie/Snell
Niko/Portis/Barnes
Lopez/Felicano/Portis
Does that team win 50+ and challenge Clev? The D would be very tough-the offense should be solid
1. Bulls go all in and make a huge offer to Barnes. Obviously, he will be overpaid, but we REALLY need an athletic 3 who can shoot, and GS might let him walk in hopes of getting KD. We have the connection with him (Iowa HS with McDermott-same HS as Hoiberg).
2. I figure Taj has positive value, Dunleavy more or less neutral and Calderon negative value-if we could dump all 3 of them, burning only second round picks if necessary, we would have lots more cap space. Lots of teams would want Taj, and give up a first of some sort. Teams might take Dunleavy as a bench shooter for a year. Calderon is a good back up PG, but over paid.
3. Sign Conley to a big deal
Bulls end up with
Conley/Moore/Grant
Butler/Valentine/Moore/Snell
Barnes/Dougie/Snell
Niko/Portis/Barnes
Lopez/Felicano/Portis
Does that team win 50+ and challenge Clev? The D would be very tough-the offense should be solid
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,463
- And1: 32,086
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
If I were the Bulls I'd rather have Crabbe at half the cost than Barnes.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 85,719
- And1: 88,704
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
jbk1234 wrote:If I were the Bulls I'd rather have Crabbe at half the cost than Barnes.
I bet Crabbe costs more than 50% of what Barnes does. I'd still rather have him as well tho.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,333
- And1: 1,058
- Joined: Jan 31, 2005
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
pipfan wrote:Assume Noah and Gasol walk
1. Bulls go all in and make a huge offer to Barnes. Obviously, he will be overpaid, but we REALLY need an athletic 3 who can shoot, and GS might let him walk in hopes of getting KD. We have the connection with him (Iowa HS with McDermott-same HS as Hoiberg).
2. I figure Taj has positive value, Dunleavy more or less neutral and Calderon negative value-if we could dump all 3 of them, burning only second round picks if necessary, we would have lots more cap space. Lots of teams would want Taj, and give up a first of some sort. Teams might take Dunleavy as a bench shooter for a year. Calderon is a good back up PG, but over paid.
3. Sign Conley to a big deal
Bulls end up with
Conley/Moore/Grant
Butler/Valentine/Moore/Snell
Barnes/Dougie/Snell
Niko/Portis/Barnes
Lopez/Felicano/Portis
Does that team win 50+ and challenge Clev? The D would be very tough-the offense should be solid
1. The odds of the Bulls signing Conley and Barnes are zero
2. If they did I still don't think they really threaten the Cavs, but would probably threaten Raps/Hawks/Celts/Heat/Bobcats
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,333
- And1: 1,058
- Joined: Jan 31, 2005
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
Texas Chuck wrote:jbk1234 wrote:If I were the Bulls I'd rather have Crabbe at half the cost than Barnes.
I bet Crabbe costs more than 50% of what Barnes does. I'd still rather have him as well tho.
Crabbe mania is getting of control... why is he better than someone random like Meeks?
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,463
- And1: 32,086
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
Golabki wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:jbk1234 wrote:If I were the Bulls I'd rather have Crabbe at half the cost than Barnes.
I bet Crabbe costs more than 50% of what Barnes does. I'd still rather have him as well tho.
Crabbe mania is getting of control.
For me, it's more of how I value Barnes on a max contract.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,674
- And1: 19,764
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
Golabki wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:jbk1234 wrote:If I were the Bulls I'd rather have Crabbe at half the cost than Barnes.
I bet Crabbe costs more than 50% of what Barnes does. I'd still rather have him as well tho.
Crabbe mania is getting of control... why is he better than someone random like Meeks?
He played 26 MPG on the 5th best team in the west and was a big contributor. He just turned 24 years old in April and showed a huge sign of improvement this season. He shot the 3 ball great at almost 40% and he has good size.
He is much better than Meeks.
tsherkin wrote:Locked due to absence of adult conversation.
penbeast0 wrote:Guys, if you don't have anything to say, don't post.
Circa 2018
E-Balla wrote:LeBron is Jeff George.
Circa 2022
G35 wrote:Lebron is not that far off from WB in trade value.
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
- CellarDoor
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 11,146
- And1: 972
- Joined: May 11, 2008
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
I'm really, really afraid of signing Barnes. Sinking 20+m of your cap into a guy who is very likely not even a championship *third* option at any point in the future is not a great start to a rebuild.
tsherkin wrote:You can run away if you like, but I'm not done with this nonsense, I'm going rip apart everything you've said so everyone else here knows that you're completely lacking in basic basketball knowledge...
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,333
- And1: 1,058
- Joined: Jan 31, 2005
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
Colbinii wrote:Golabki wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:
I bet Crabbe costs more than 50% of what Barnes does. I'd still rather have him as well tho.
Crabbe mania is getting of control... why is he better than someone random like Meeks?
He played 26 MPG on the 5th best team in the west and was a big contributor. He just turned 24 years old in April and showed a huge sign of improvement this season. He shot the 3 ball great at almost 40% and he has good size.
He is much better than Meeks.
Crabbe's a pretty good 3pt point shooter, but not a great one, doesn't do much else on offense, doesn't really play much defense. i'm not convinced he's anything more than a serviceable rotation SG, which is what Meeks is too. Crabbe obviously has more upside (although he's not really that young anymore) and isn't coming off an injury... but I think big money to Crabbe (4 years, $60M?) could end up being one of the worst decisions made in this offseason.
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,769
- And1: 7,453
- Joined: Nov 24, 2006
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
Golabki wrote:Crabbe's a pretty good 3pt point shooter, but not a great one, doesn't do much else on offense, doesn't really play much defense. i'm not convinced he's anything more than a serviceable rotation SG, which is what Meeks is too. Crabbe obviously has more upside (although he's not really that young anymore) and isn't coming off an injury... but I think big money to Crabbe (4 years, $60M?) could end up being one of the worst decisions made in this offseason.
Seconding this.
Crabbe was ranked 85th in DRPM this past year among SGs (first year playing major minutes), had a negative on/off on both sides of the ball, sported a DRTG of 110, and rebounds poorly for his size.
I mean, really, what does this guy do other than shoot reasonably well (not elite, not great, he's just good)?
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,800
- And1: 3,370
- Joined: Apr 05, 2012
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
I think it's more realistic that we look like:
Moore/Valetine/Grant/
Butler/Snell/Valentine
Barnes/McDermott/Zipser
Mirotic/Gibson/Portis
Lopez/Felicio
Stretch Dunleavy and Calderon. Maybe add one vet min big man (Nazr Moahmmed, Dewayne Dedmon, somebody)
I think that's a 48 win team, and is a 3-6 seed in the East.
Moore/Valetine/Grant/
Butler/Snell/Valentine
Barnes/McDermott/Zipser
Mirotic/Gibson/Portis
Lopez/Felicio
Stretch Dunleavy and Calderon. Maybe add one vet min big man (Nazr Moahmmed, Dewayne Dedmon, somebody)
I think that's a 48 win team, and is a 3-6 seed in the East.
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
- TGW
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,610
- And1: 5,883
- Joined: Oct 22, 2010
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
Barnes is such a garbage player. It's really nice to play as the 6th option on the best offensive team in the league in a contract year.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,856
- And1: 5,830
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
With Conley, it's a 55-win team. Though when push comes to shove in the playoffs they're not that close to a healthy Cleveland team. They're more like this year's Toronto team.
Without Conley they're more 45-win level. An upgrade from last year, but only enough to make the playoffs not to be interesting.
Without Conley they're more 45-win level. An upgrade from last year, but only enough to make the playoffs not to be interesting.
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,494
- And1: 4,481
- Joined: Jan 07, 2012
- Location: Atl
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
rpa wrote:Golabki wrote:Crabbe's a pretty good 3pt point shooter, but not a great one, doesn't do much else on offense, doesn't really play much defense. i'm not convinced he's anything more than a serviceable rotation SG, which is what Meeks is too. Crabbe obviously has more upside (although he's not really that young anymore) and isn't coming off an injury... but I think big money to Crabbe (4 years, $60M?) could end up being one of the worst decisions made in this offseason.
Seconding this.
Crabbe was ranked 85th in DRPM this past year among SGs (first year playing major minutes), had a negative on/off on both sides of the ball, sported a DRTG of 110, and rebounds poorly for his size.
I mean, really, what does this guy do other than shoot reasonably well (not elite, not great, he's just good)?
Advance stats are nearly meaningless when gauging defense. They are so subjective. Advance stats doesn't say anything about Crabbe defending guys to a 39% FG% last year.
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,333
- And1: 1,058
- Joined: Jan 31, 2005
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
Wasabi_Johnson wrote:rpa wrote:Golabki wrote:Crabbe's a pretty good 3pt point shooter, but not a great one, doesn't do much else on offense, doesn't really play much defense. i'm not convinced he's anything more than a serviceable rotation SG, which is what Meeks is too. Crabbe obviously has more upside (although he's not really that young anymore) and isn't coming off an injury... but I think big money to Crabbe (4 years, $60M?) could end up being one of the worst decisions made in this offseason.
Seconding this.
Crabbe was ranked 85th in DRPM this past year among SGs (first year playing major minutes), had a negative on/off on both sides of the ball, sported a DRTG of 110, and rebounds poorly for his size.
I mean, really, what does this guy do other than shoot reasonably well (not elite, not great, he's just good)?
Advance stats are nearly meaningless when gauging defense. They are so subjective. Advance stats doesn't say anything about Crabbe defending guys to a 39% FG% last year.
two things...
1. I'm not sure you are using the word "subjective" correctly.
2. Where's that opponent FG% number from? Nylon calculus seems to have a very different view on opponent production?
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,225
- And1: 4,433
- Joined: May 12, 2015
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
Crabbe and Ross are pretty much the exact same player. If bet he gets in the 15 mil range.
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,810
- And1: 3,355
- Joined: Aug 07, 2010
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
I figure Butler is an OK #1-top 15/20 player and should be at his peak this coming season-put him down for 22/game
Niko would have to become a legit second option-possible, let's say 18/8
Barnes as a 3rd option is not the end of the world-16/game with solid D
Conley is a top 7-10 pg, let's say 14/game
Lopez should be good for 10/10
McDermott should emerge as a very good 6th man, I could easily see 12/game
Portis, Felicio, Valentine, Moore, Grant, Snell-an OK bench
That team should be #2 in the East-4 out of 5 defenders in starting lineup are positive, and Niko is not terrible on D
Lots of shooting and rebounding would be fine
Niko would have to become a legit second option-possible, let's say 18/8
Barnes as a 3rd option is not the end of the world-16/game with solid D
Conley is a top 7-10 pg, let's say 14/game
Lopez should be good for 10/10
McDermott should emerge as a very good 6th man, I could easily see 12/game
Portis, Felicio, Valentine, Moore, Grant, Snell-an OK bench
That team should be #2 in the East-4 out of 5 defenders in starting lineup are positive, and Niko is not terrible on D
Lots of shooting and rebounding would be fine
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,494
- And1: 4,481
- Joined: Jan 07, 2012
- Location: Atl
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
Golabki wrote:Wasabi_Johnson wrote:rpa wrote:
Seconding this.
Crabbe was ranked 85th in DRPM this past year among SGs (first year playing major minutes), had a negative on/off on both sides of the ball, sported a DRTG of 110, and rebounds poorly for his size.
I mean, really, what does this guy do other than shoot reasonably well (not elite, not great, he's just good)?
Advance stats are nearly meaningless when gauging defense. They are so subjective. Advance stats doesn't say anything about Crabbe defending guys to a 39% FG% last year.
two things...
1. I'm not sure you are using the word "subjective" correctly.
2. Where's that opponent FG% number from? Nylon calculus seems to have a very different view on opponent production?
1. DRTG and DRPM are both based on somebody opinion of what an impact play is. The numbers that are used in these formulas are weighted by their opinion . Advance defensive stats is much more an theory than law.
2. nba.com defense stats.
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,092
- And1: 1,474
- Joined: Jun 20, 2015
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
45-50 win team. Probably a second round exit. Won't contend with the cavs anytime soon unless Barnes magically turns into an all star.
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
- Pipp33
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,105
- And1: 642
- Joined: Apr 05, 2014
- Location: Down Under
Re: How Good is this Bulls' Team?
I think I would prefer that they clear the decks this coming season - trade Butler for a young stud + picks and build from there. By overpaying Barnes, who no one knows how he will go outside of Warrior's system, could end up being a terrible investment. See what we can get from Valentine this season and also evaluate how Niko and Doug go as more featured players.
Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team
Return to Trades and Transactions