PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,144
- And1: 608
- Joined: Apr 21, 2014
PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
76ers trade- Okafor
76ers get- Bledsoe, Koufus
76ers do this b/c: they finally get their PG who is locked in for the next 3 years. Theyd have a very athletic core in Bledsoe, Simmons, Noel and Embiid. With Simmons playing the point forward at times, the lineups would be flexible enough to shift Bledsoe at SG on offense at times. This would be a fun team to watch.
Hornets trade- MKG, Lamb, Zeller, unprotected1st
Hornets get- Okafor, Gay
Hornets do this b/c: we saw 2 years ago what a prime Big Al could do on this team. Just think what Okafor could do with all his years ahead of him. Gay can fill in for MKG this year and will most likely opt out next year. This leaves the Hornets flexible financially in the offseason. This also allows Frank to be a stretch 4 behind Marvin and eliminates our delima of how much to sign Zeller back for in the offseason.
Kings trade- Gay, Koufus
Kings get- MKG, Chandler
Kings do this b/c: Gay apparently wants out. MKG is signed to a great deal over the next 3 years. Bobcats stole Gerald Wallace from the Kings in the expansion draft many years ago. Now we give you a guy who can be the better version of him. Adding Tyson gives WCS somebody to mentor him. Also lets Cousins step in day 1 at PF and know he has a seasoned vet protecting the paint
Suns trade- Bledsoe, Chandler
Suns get- CHA's 1st, Lamb, Zeller
Suns do this b/c: they shed a ton of salary, while getting younger. This team has a great young core. They need to groom these guys and focus on the future. I think both Zeller and Lamb could step in and make an instant impact. Not to mention getting an unprotected 1st
76ers get- Bledsoe, Koufus
76ers do this b/c: they finally get their PG who is locked in for the next 3 years. Theyd have a very athletic core in Bledsoe, Simmons, Noel and Embiid. With Simmons playing the point forward at times, the lineups would be flexible enough to shift Bledsoe at SG on offense at times. This would be a fun team to watch.
Hornets trade- MKG, Lamb, Zeller, unprotected1st
Hornets get- Okafor, Gay
Hornets do this b/c: we saw 2 years ago what a prime Big Al could do on this team. Just think what Okafor could do with all his years ahead of him. Gay can fill in for MKG this year and will most likely opt out next year. This leaves the Hornets flexible financially in the offseason. This also allows Frank to be a stretch 4 behind Marvin and eliminates our delima of how much to sign Zeller back for in the offseason.
Kings trade- Gay, Koufus
Kings get- MKG, Chandler
Kings do this b/c: Gay apparently wants out. MKG is signed to a great deal over the next 3 years. Bobcats stole Gerald Wallace from the Kings in the expansion draft many years ago. Now we give you a guy who can be the better version of him. Adding Tyson gives WCS somebody to mentor him. Also lets Cousins step in day 1 at PF and know he has a seasoned vet protecting the paint
Suns trade- Bledsoe, Chandler
Suns get- CHA's 1st, Lamb, Zeller
Suns do this b/c: they shed a ton of salary, while getting younger. This team has a great young core. They need to groom these guys and focus on the future. I think both Zeller and Lamb could step in and make an instant impact. Not to mention getting an unprotected 1st
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,481
- And1: 1,887
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
This leaves Sac with a logjam at SF since they have Casspi and Barnes. Sac wants to balance their roster in a Gay deal so this doesn't make sense for them.
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,144
- And1: 608
- Joined: Apr 21, 2014
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
lakerhater wrote:This leaves Sac with a logjam at SF since they have Casspi and Barnes. Sac wants to balance their roster in Gay deal so this doesn't make sense for them.
What position do u think they go after? PG? Also, can't Casspi play SG? Barnes is also getting up there in age. Is him or Casspi who u want starting at SF?
Not disagreeing, just asking
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 105
- And1: 45
- Joined: Feb 24, 2016
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
I hate this for Phoenix. Not only do the Suns have no interest in trading Bledsoe, they definitely wouldn't trade him for this package. Chandler is no longer a bad contract either as we saw what players like Plumlee got paid today. On top of all that, you say we have all this outgoing salary like it's a good thing. We haven't even hit the salary floor yet so we don't want more outgoing salary, if anything we want a little incoming if the situation is right. The only thing I like about this is it gives Ulis time and Len all the center minutes he can handle.
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,481
- And1: 1,887
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
BuzzCity wrote:lakerhater wrote:This leaves Sac with a logjam at SF since they have Casspi and Barnes. Sac wants to balance their roster in Gay deal so this doesn't make sense for them.
What position do u think they go after? PG? Also, can't Casspi play SG? Barnes is also getting up there in age. Is him or Casspi who u want starting at SF?
Not disagreeing, just asking
If Casspi could play SG he would have played it last season. He and Barnes will likely split the SF minutes.
PG and a stretch 4 are their greatest positions of need.
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,616
- And1: 1,716
- Joined: Feb 13, 2014
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
lakerhater wrote:This leaves Sac with a logjam at SF since they have Casspi and Barnes. Sac wants to balance their roster in a Gay deal so this doesn't make sense for them.
This just doesn't matter. MKG would be a huge get for the Kings. If we got him while only giving up Gay and Koufos, I would be over the moon. Barnes can play the 2, 3, and spot stretch 4 minutes. The same goes for Casspi. MKG can play the 2 and the 3. I see no logjam. This trade would simply be amazing for the Kings. Unfortunately, it just won't happen. MKG has more value than this.
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 219
- And1: 29
- Joined: Jun 26, 2016
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
BuzzCity wrote:lakerhater wrote:This leaves Sac with a logjam at SF since they have Casspi and Barnes. Sac wants to balance their roster in Gay deal so this doesn't make sense for them.
What position do u think they go after? PG? Also, can't Casspi play SG? Barnes is also getting up there in age. Is him or Casspi who u want starting at SF?
Not disagreeing, just asking
I disagree, I think we need 3 SFs as Barnes is getting old plus Joerger has said Barnes will play a lot of 4 this year.
Our biggest need is a backup PG and maybe another SF if gay is traded. I like MKG but I feel like he isn't a good fit with him not being able to shoot. I also don't think chandler is a good fit with his contract. I would much rather keep koufos.
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 151
- And1: 30
- Joined: Dec 12, 2013
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
SunsBlood23 wrote:I hate this for Phoenix. Not only do the Suns have no interest in trading Bledsoe, they definitely wouldn't trade him for this package. Chandler is no longer a bad contract either as we saw what players like Plumlee got paid today. On top of all that, you say we have all this outgoing salary like it's a good thing. We haven't even hit the salary floor yet so we don't want more outgoing salary, if anything we want a little incoming if the situation is right. The only thing I like about this is it gives Ulis time and Len all the center minutes he can handle.
Totally agree.
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
- NashtyNas
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,259
- And1: 1,887
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
This is basically throwing in Phoenix to be the boned team to make something work for the other squads.
We're giving up literally the second most valuable piece in this trade and are getting nothing of value back for it. I don't touch this with a 10 foot pole as a Suns fan, and whoever proposes it is instantly on my blocked callers list.
You literally mention 2 reasons, we get younger and we shed salary. Neither of those is worth giving up Bledsoe at this point.
We are in no way "old" and we definitely don't need to shed Chandler at the cost of Bledsoe. That CHA "unprotected" pick is almost guaranteed to be mediocre after these moves - likely in the 15-20 range.
Man this is bad.... I need a drink.
We're giving up literally the second most valuable piece in this trade and are getting nothing of value back for it. I don't touch this with a 10 foot pole as a Suns fan, and whoever proposes it is instantly on my blocked callers list.
You literally mention 2 reasons, we get younger and we shed salary. Neither of those is worth giving up Bledsoe at this point.
We are in no way "old" and we definitely don't need to shed Chandler at the cost of Bledsoe. That CHA "unprotected" pick is almost guaranteed to be mediocre after these moves - likely in the 15-20 range.
Man this is bad.... I need a drink.
The underappreciated greats:
Some seek fame cause they need validation, some say hating is confused admiration - Nasty, nasty Nas
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,597
- And1: 1,080
- Joined: Jan 11, 2002
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
Makes (some) sense for PHI, SAC and CHA take out the value from the Suns, therefore terrible for PHO.
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,590
- And1: 50,209
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
SunsBlood23 wrote:I hate this for Phoenix. Not only do the Suns have no interest in trading Bledsoe, they definitely wouldn't trade him for this package. Chandler is no longer a bad contract either as we saw what players like Plumlee got paid today. On top of all that, you say we have all this outgoing salary like it's a good thing. We haven't even hit the salary floor yet so we don't want more outgoing salary, if anything we want a little incoming if the situation is right. The only thing I like about this is it gives Ulis time and Len all the center minutes he can handle.
Other than the Chandler part (still think its a bad contract), agree with this pretty well.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 46,998
- And1: 20,538
- Joined: Apr 07, 2010
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
I dislike it a bunch for Philly.
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,144
- And1: 608
- Joined: Apr 21, 2014
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
I_Socrates wrote:This is basically throwing in Phoenix to be the boned team to make something work for the other squads.
We're giving up literally the second most valuable piece in this trade and are getting nothing of value back for it. I don't touch this with a 10 foot pole as a Suns fan, and whoever proposes it is instantly on my blocked callers list.
You literally mention 2 reasons, we get younger and we shed salary. Neither of those is worth giving up Bledsoe at this point.
We are in no way "old" and we definitely don't need to shed Chandler at the cost of Bledsoe. That CHA "unprotected" pick is almost guaranteed to be mediocre after these moves - likely in the 15-20 range.
Man this is bad.... I need a drink.
I apologize...threw this together late and knew when I hit send that most Suns fans would prolly hate it...like somebody else mentioned, you guys haven't hit the salary floor yet, which I didn't know. Let me tweek this quite a bit for the Suns. When I look at your team, I see a lot of great talent that needs to be developed, but no particular hole. Just needing PT for those guys to get experience. But you're right, you should get back better value for trading Bledsoe.
It's interesting to see some Kings fans like it while others don't. I know the Suns still wouldn't hit the floor, but with if Zeller went to the Kings and WCS came to the Suns? It's still not enough but would that be a player you'd at least be interested in?
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- Forum Mod - 76ers
- Posts: 13,441
- And1: 14,114
- Joined: Jan 16, 2014
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
This is robbery for the Hornets.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,759
- And1: 574
- Joined: Aug 07, 2001
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
This seems like a pretty questionable return for Philly, especially considering that they end up having to pay Koufos for the next 3 seasons on a team that already has too many big men. So the only positive return is Bledsoe and his very questionable injury history? I imagine Philly would pass.
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
- NashtyNas
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,259
- And1: 1,887
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
BuzzCity wrote:I apologize...threw this together late and knew when I hit send that most Suns fans would prolly hate it...like somebody else mentioned, you guys haven't hit the salary floor yet, which I didn't know. Let me tweek this quite a bit for the Suns. When I look at your team, I see a lot of great talent that needs to be developed, but no particular hole. Just needing PT for those guys to get experience. But you're right, you should get back better value for trading Bledsoe.
It's interesting to see some Kings fans like it while others don't. I know the Suns still wouldn't hit the floor, but with if Zeller went to the Kings and WCS came to the Suns? It's still not enough but would that be a player you'd at least be interested in?
Hey, no need to apologize. Everyone has bad proposals on here at one point or another, some more than others.
WCS is a great prospect and I'm sure most teams are interested in him. I like him, but I'm not giving up Bleds for him since we have Len already anyway. If anything, I'd be more interested in a Knight/Gay swap with the Kings.
The Suns really have no place in this other than to give up value that other teams are seeking and not get any back themselves. Deals like those rarely work because there is one team getting massively boned, and that would be the Suns in this case.
Based on the pieces moving around, I don't see the Suns being a part of this type of move at all. We'd just let those other 3 figure out which one of them will get the shortest stick instead of picking it up ourselves.
The underappreciated greats:
Some seek fame cause they need validation, some say hating is confused admiration - Nasty, nasty Nas
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
- City of Trees
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 15,798
- And1: 5,462
- Joined: Dec 23, 2009
- Location: Roseville, CA
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
I think Sac needs to send out more assets to even out value here.
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,166
- And1: 3,590
- Joined: Feb 28, 2010
- Location: Kentucky Suns
- Contact:
Re: PHI/CHA/SAC/PHX...Big names on the move
No incentive for Phoenix to do this. Lose their best player, and a great veteran presence who are both on great contracts.
Not to mention, the Suns are not looking to shed salary at all.
Not to mention, the Suns are not looking to shed salary at all.
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win
Return to Trades and Transactions