DusterBuster wrote:GutUNC wrote:Patsfan1081 wrote:
Monk has one year of college ball and no real indication on how his game will transfer to the pro level. You're comparing the offense of a college player to a pro. I could understand maybe wanting to take a chance on a prospect like Fultz or Ball with a young team like Philly, but the chances of Monk becoming the player McCollum isn't very high.
But as always, the comparison is Monk + $20M in players vs. McCollum (or whoever the players involved are).
I know I'm gonna regret this post.....
But as always, there's also no guarantee that Monk + $20M in players is better than McCollum. Monk could be a bust and those $20M in players will in all likelihood be role players since Philly has yet to be a FA destination.
Of course there's no guarantee, there never is and no one's saying there is. But I'd rather take my chances with a top-5 pick and $20M then on McCollum, a very good player, but one who's undersized and is a sub-par defender. Maybe the pick busts and you spend the money on Allen Crabbe 2.0 - but I'll take the odds that it doesn't over being locked in to McCollum (again - no offense to CJM, who I like).