#2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10?

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

User avatar
City of Trees
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 15,798
And1: 5,462
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: RE: Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#21 » by City of Trees » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:00 pm

lakerhater wrote:If Sac turned down 10 and 5 for 2 why in the world would they all of a sudden change their minds on that decision while simultaneously bailing LAL out of Dengbatross's contract?

Absolutely no chance Sac does this deal.

It was 5 OR 10... So basically 10 for 2/Deng


Upside Kings draft Jackson/Tatum and Fox.
Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
lakerhater
General Manager
Posts: 9,481
And1: 1,887
Joined: Jul 04, 2002
 

Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#22 » by lakerhater » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:00 pm

City of Trees wrote:2, 27, 28, Deng for 10, Afflalo

It's all or nothing. Deng $$$ is that bad and LAL still get top 10 pick.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


This is much closer to what Sac would need in a Dengbatross contract dump.
User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,454
And1: 3,233
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, galloway and #5? 

Post#23 » by blind prophet » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:02 pm

jbk1234 wrote:If the Kings wouldn't trade Nos. 5 & 10 for No. 2, I can't see why they'd do this.

If you want to dump Deng, you'll have to move down to No. 10. That's probably enough to get PG


Yeah that's how bad his salary is.

I'd eat it for the 2 and give you back the 10.

Think the Lakers are better off where they are now, than making that deal.
uraverage
Rookie
Posts: 1,172
And1: 457
Joined: Jun 11, 2015
 

Re: RE: Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#24 » by uraverage » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:02 pm

City of Trees wrote:
uraverage wrote:So would something like #6, Ross, and Watson (1 mill guaranteed this year) for #2 and Deng Work for LA?

LAL should jump all over that. IMO horrible for Orlando.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app



I do agree with you that on the surface this looks horrible for the Magic, but i feel this helps the Magic long term. I think that the magic need to make a move up in this draft to hopefully get an impact player. For the last few years the magic have been on the wrong side of the top tier in the draft and with new management in place they really need to take a swing here. I do hate to take on the long term salary but i feel the risk is worth it to have a shot at a player like Ball\JJ\Tatum.
User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,454
And1: 3,233
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#25 » by blind prophet » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:04 pm

lakerhater wrote:
City of Trees wrote:2, 27, 28, Deng for 10, Afflalo

It's all or nothing. Deng $$$ is that bad and LAL still get top 10 pick.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


This is much closer to what Sac would need in a Dengbatross contract dump.


Nah that's over pay by the Lakers.

Well adding both the 27 & 28.

Maybe our 34 for their 28.

But all that would be larceny.
AlexPresser
Sophomore
Posts: 199
And1: 33
Joined: Jan 28, 2017

Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#26 » by AlexPresser » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:05 pm

Isn't the rumor that king's turned down 2 for 5 and 10 don't think k Deng will convince them otherwise.

Sent from my XT1650 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 46,488
And1: 14,733
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#27 » by Snakebites » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:08 pm

AlexPresser wrote:Isn't the rumor that king's turned down 2 for 5 and 10 don't think k Deng will convince them otherwise.

Sent from my XT1650 using RealGM mobile app


Well in fairness this deal is 5 OR 10, not both, so that's not really a fair comparison.

That said, I think its pretty clear the Kings wouldn't do this. They might hesitate on the deal if it was just the number 10 pick if there's 2 top 5 guys they really really want.
AlexPresser
Sophomore
Posts: 199
And1: 33
Joined: Jan 28, 2017

Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#28 » by AlexPresser » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:09 pm

I think 2 and Deng for 10 and affalo is fair.

Sent from my XT1650 using RealGM mobile app
AlexPresser
Sophomore
Posts: 199
And1: 33
Joined: Jan 28, 2017

Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#29 » by AlexPresser » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:10 pm

2 27 28 Deng for 5 afflalo could work of kings really want Jackson or ball

Sent from my XT1650 using RealGM mobile app
AlexPresser
Sophomore
Posts: 199
And1: 33
Joined: Jan 28, 2017

Re: RE: Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#30 » by AlexPresser » Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:40 pm

Snakebites wrote:
AlexPresser wrote:Isn't the rumor that king's turned down 2 for 5 and 10 don't think k Deng will convince them otherwise.

Sent from my XT1650 using RealGM mobile app


Well in fairness this deal is 5 OR 10, not both, so that's not really a fair comparison.

That said, I think its pretty clear the Kings wouldn't do this. They might hesitate on the deal if it was just the number 10 pick if there's 2 top 5 guys they really really want.

I misread it I thought it said both

Sent from my XT1650 using RealGM mobile app
SactownHrtBrks8
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,978
And1: 68
Joined: Jun 10, 2004
 

Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#31 » by SactownHrtBrks8 » Thu Jun 22, 2017 7:02 pm

I would take Deng and the second for the 10th and run.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 16,872
And1: 10,550
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#32 » by LightTheBeam » Thu Jun 22, 2017 7:17 pm

Deng/2nd for 10 sounds good to me.

Lakers flip 10/randle/clarkson for George.

Kings draft Jackson/fox.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using RealGM mobile app
Resistance
General Manager
Posts: 9,848
And1: 3,364
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#33 » by Resistance » Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:11 pm

There was some backlash from trading Russell to dump Mozgov earlier this week. It would aggravate some in their fanbase again to trade back from #2 to dump Deng. My guess is that they wouldn't want the negative publicity such a move would bring.
User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,454
And1: 3,233
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#34 » by blind prophet » Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:22 pm

Resistance wrote:There was some backlash from trading Russell to dump Mozgov earlier this week. It would aggravate some in their fanbase again to trade back from #2 to dump Deng. My guess is that they wouldn't want the negative publicity such a move would bring.


If they cleared Mozzy & Deng and got PG and another prime FA would that help?
Resistance
General Manager
Posts: 9,848
And1: 3,364
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: #2 and Deng for afflalo, and #5 or 10? 

Post#35 » by Resistance » Thu Jun 22, 2017 8:33 pm

blind prophet wrote:
Resistance wrote:There was some backlash from trading Russell to dump Mozgov earlier this week. It would aggravate some in their fanbase again to trade back from #2 to dump Deng. My guess is that they wouldn't want the negative publicity such a move would bring.


If they cleared Mozzy & Deng and got PG and another prime FA would that help?



To a certain extent, but if #2 + Deng for #10 happens, this is what they would have to show for several seasons of whatever they have been doing on the court:

* 2017 -- #10
* 2017 -- #27
* Ingram
* Randle who will need a new contract soon and still has some things to improve on


2017 -- #28 was from a trade with Houston
Nance was acquired with a pick from the Houston moving Lin.
Clarkson was acquired with a purchased pick


Overall, the direct results from their W/L record won't be that much to brag on. Yes, they will have cap space, but they could have achieved that and still had come away with better assets in the first category.

Return to Trades and Transactions