Bulls and OKC
Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX
Bulls and OKC
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 906
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 24, 2008
Bulls and OKC
BULLS TRADE
PG-K.Hinrich and PF-C.Simmons
BULLS REC
PF-J.Smith,C-J.Petro and SG/SF-D.Wilkens
OKC TRADE
PF-J.Smith,C-J.Petro and SG/SF-D.Wilkens
OKC REC
PG-K.Hinrich and PF-C.Simmons
Reasons Bulls finally rid themselves of Hinrichs contract which OKC can afford and would fit in nicely with OKC.Also adding solid expiring vet in Smith and prospect big expiring in Petro.This could allow them to resign ben gordon and Wilkens contract comes off next season ready for the 2010 free agency frenzy.
PG-K.Hinrich and PF-C.Simmons
BULLS REC
PF-J.Smith,C-J.Petro and SG/SF-D.Wilkens
OKC TRADE
PF-J.Smith,C-J.Petro and SG/SF-D.Wilkens
OKC REC
PG-K.Hinrich and PF-C.Simmons
Reasons Bulls finally rid themselves of Hinrichs contract which OKC can afford and would fit in nicely with OKC.Also adding solid expiring vet in Smith and prospect big expiring in Petro.This could allow them to resign ben gordon and Wilkens contract comes off next season ready for the 2010 free agency frenzy.
Re: Bulls and OKC
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 906
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 24, 2008
Re: Bulls and OKC
How about another option PG-Hinrich and PF-Simmons for PG-Watson and PF-Smith.Watson is up for grabs and his contract also comes off at the right time.
Re: Bulls and OKC
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 12,032
- And1: 88
- Joined: May 04, 2007
Re: Bulls and OKC
I'd imagine this is something CHI has to at LEAST consider, and do if I was them.
Re: Bulls and OKC
- Hoops23
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,797
- And1: 1,269
- Joined: Jan 15, 2003
- Location: City of Angels
Re: Bulls and OKC
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 12,032
- And1: 88
- Joined: May 04, 2007
Re: Bulls and OKC
You don't think a productive expiring is worth Hinrich? IF I'm CHI, I than flip him or Gooden to whoever I can for a late pick in this draft and call it a day.
Re: Bulls and OKC
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 906
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 24, 2008
Re: Bulls and OKC
Hoops23 wrote:Bad trade for the Bulls!
Be nice to explain why.Hinrichs a very expensive backup point they cant afford unless they want Ben Gordon to skip for nothing and that contarct also runs past 2010 free agency.Hinrichs a good player but what do the Bulls expect to get in return.
Re: Bulls and OKC
- coldfish
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 59,069
- And1: 35,309
- Joined: Jun 11, 2004
- Location: Right in the middle
Re: Bulls and OKC
At this point, we really don't know what direction the Bulls are going. A lot of fans want to go 2010, but we haven't seen that from the organization at all.
To that end, I really don't think they want to shed salary.
If the Thunder wants a Bulls guard, just sign Gordon for 5.50 this summer. He is a lot better than Hinrich. Westbrook is a near perfect complement for him.
Draft Thabeet, sign Boozer too and away you go.
Westbrook
Gordon
Durant
Boozer
Thabeet
To that end, I really don't think they want to shed salary.
If the Thunder wants a Bulls guard, just sign Gordon for 5.50 this summer. He is a lot better than Hinrich. Westbrook is a near perfect complement for him.
Draft Thabeet, sign Boozer too and away you go.
Westbrook
Gordon
Durant
Boozer
Thabeet
Re: Bulls and OKC
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 906
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 24, 2008
Re: Bulls and OKC
coldfish wrote:At this point, we really don't know what direction the Bulls are going. A lot of fans want to go 2010, but we haven't seen that from the organization at all.
To that end, I really don't think they want to shed salary.
If the Thunder wants a Bulls guard, just sign Gordon for 5.50 this summer. He is a lot better than Hinrich. Westbrook is a near perfect complement for him.
Draft Thabeet, sign Boozer too and away you go.
Westbrook
Gordon
Durant
Boozer
Thabeet
Considered Ben Gordon but how much would he cost wasnt he asking for 10mill plus over six years.5.5mill seems a bit cheap and dont think his salary demands would have dropped that much.Hinrichs contract is shorter,reduces and has PG skills with good defense which would fit in nicely with Presti and his defensive minded team.
considered
Re: Bulls and OKC
- coldfish
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 59,069
- And1: 35,309
- Joined: Jun 11, 2004
- Location: Right in the middle
Re: Bulls and OKC
london sonic wrote:Considered Ben Gordon but how much would he cost wasnt he asking for 10mill plus over six years.5.5mill seems a bit cheap and dont think his salary demands would have dropped that much.Hinrichs contract is shorter,reduces and has PG skills with good defense which would fit in nicely with Presti and his defensive minded team.
That was 5 years $50M, which is what you were thinking. The defensive difference between Gordon and Hinrich recently is marginal.
Re: Bulls and OKC
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 26,221
- And1: 15
- Joined: Dec 14, 2004
Re: Bulls and OKC
coldfish wrote:london sonic wrote:Considered Ben Gordon but how much would he cost wasnt he asking for 10mill plus over six years.5.5mill seems a bit cheap and dont think his salary demands would have dropped that much.Hinrichs contract is shorter,reduces and has PG skills with good defense which would fit in nicely with Presti and his defensive minded team.
That was 5 years $50M, which is what you were thinking. The defensive difference between Gordon and Hinrich recently is marginal.
I am sure Ben Gordon would love to move to a city 1/20 the size of Chicago.
Re: Bulls and OKC
- coldfish
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 59,069
- And1: 35,309
- Joined: Jun 11, 2004
- Location: Right in the middle
Re: Bulls and OKC
boogydown wrote:
I am sure Ben Gordon would love to move to a city 1/20 the size of Chicago.
Ben maintains his home and contacts in NYC. I'm not sure that where he plays matters that much.
Re: Bulls and OKC
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 906
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 24, 2008
Re: Bulls and OKC
coldfish wrote:london sonic wrote:Considered Ben Gordon but how much would he cost wasnt he asking for 10mill plus over six years.5.5mill seems a bit cheap and dont think his salary demands would have dropped that much.Hinrichs contract is shorter,reduces and has PG skills with good defense which would fit in nicely with Presti and his defensive minded team.
That was 5 years $50M, which is what you were thinking. The defensive difference between Gordon and Hinrich recently is marginal.
Not sure OKC would throw that much at him Bulls didnt.
Re: Bulls and OKC
- Baddy Chuck
- RealGM
- Posts: 49,652
- And1: 22,776
- Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Re: Bulls and OKC
I dont see why the Thunder take on Hinrichs huge contract with Westbrook looking like their PG of the future?
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
Return to Trades and Transactions