Bulls/Kings

Moderators: Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe, loserX

BrickDeez
Ballboy
Posts: 48
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 13, 2009

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#21 » by BrickDeez » Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:42 pm

What!?! Posting the names of other guys that are far too reliant on their jumpshots doesn't prove that Hawes doesn't suffer from the same problem. What you're posting is nothing more than intellectually dishonest spin.
Bulls 2010 Free Agent: David Lee
Ricepilar
Head Coach
Posts: 6,786
And1: 73
Joined: Aug 20, 2003

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#22 » by Ricepilar » Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:42 pm

No clue why the Bulls make this trade...
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,268
And1: 5,446
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#23 » by KF10 » Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:46 pm

BrickDeez wrote:What!?! Posting the names of other guys that are far too reliant on their jumpshots doesn't prove that Hawes doesn't suffer from the same problem. What you're posting is nothing more than intellectually dishonest spin.


The reason why I posted that little factoid because Hawes shares a same characteristic with those players in terms of three point makes/att. But the point was that Hawes is much more post reliant than those guys.

Again, (Dang, I feel like a broken recorder) you are still ignoring critical factors when discussing about Hawes. Your lack of knowledge of Hawes/Kings is glaring in this thread.
User avatar
longfellow44
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,800
And1: 113
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#24 » by longfellow44 » Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:49 pm

Honestly if there were a trade to occur between the kings and the bulls with Hawes going to the bulls it would likely include, Noah coming to the kings. I just couldn't in good conscience do the original trade, largely because of Tyrus's tweener status.
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 59,019
And1: 35,216
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#25 » by coldfish » Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:03 pm

longfellow44 wrote:Honestly if there were a trade to occur between the kings and the bulls with Hawes going to the bulls it would likely include, Noah coming to the kings. I just couldn't in good conscience do the original trade, largely because of Tyrus's tweener status.


If I was the Kings, no way would I trade Hawes for Tyrus. An expiring contract with questionable size and other issues. Hawes is worth more than that.

If I was Chicago, no way would I trade Noah for Hawes. Interior defense wins in the NBA and Noah has shown a lot of improvement in both strength and skill.
lakerhater
General Manager
Posts: 9,481
And1: 1,887
Joined: Jul 04, 2002
 

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#26 » by lakerhater » Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:11 pm

rpa wrote:
BrickDeez wrote:he's a career backup at best.


BrickDeez wrote:He has the potential to develop into a legit starter


Either you need to develop a better grasp of the English language or stop throwing little hissy fits when someone disagrees with you and you have no real way of disproving them other than stats.


Either way, you're trade sucks. "True center" or not, a center of any legit talent has more value than a combo forward who doesn't do anything all that well. If you want to talk about career backup "at best" maybe you should be looking Tyrus' way.


rpa wins with a tko in this flame war.
User avatar
Slackerr
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,646
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 12, 2008

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#27 » by Slackerr » Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:34 pm

How much closer would it be if Chicago added a 1st? I think Hawes + Noah could be a pretty good frontcourt.
Image
dflaschberger
Analyst
Posts: 3,389
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 23, 2004

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#28 » by dflaschberger » Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:03 pm

As a bulls fan I agree that the kings don't do it. They have thompson at the 4 long term. Their value is close, but Hawes's is greater due to his position and a year less.

An unprotected first from the bulls (or little protection) would help, but Sac should drop it.

They should try to deal KMart now to the jazz, dump udrich and get the knicks' pick-then build around hawes, thompson, evans, 2 top 5 picks next summer, tons of cap space and some spare parts.
User avatar
Nicky Nix Nook
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,672
And1: 153
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Contact:
       

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#29 » by Nicky Nix Nook » Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:11 pm

BrickDeez wrote:What are you writing about. Didn't you just post not too long ago that 52% of his attack came from jumpshots? More than half of his attack comes from jays, since when that became the ideal for a legit starting center?

Gimme a break here, Hawes is a guy has as many holes and question marks as Tyrus Thomas. When you look at the head to head stat comparison, you have to factor in that Thomas played for a playoff team, while Hawes was on the worst team in the league. So you probably have to put his numbers (which are not that good to start with) in prespective.


:lol: What a joke.

I would try and debate you intelligently but it is clear you don't listen to logic.

Stop pretending that you have any knowledge of Hawes' game. Bad trade move on.
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#30 » by Cliff Levingston » Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:30 pm

Cliff Levingston would pass from the Bulls' perspective. Tyrus is a higher upside player who probably won't reach his great potential, but at the very least, he's an expiring contract this year which helps clear space for a potential blockbuster free agent.

On top of that, Hawes wouldn't take the starting 5 job away from Noah while we also have Omer Asik slated to come to America for next season, so thanks but no thanks.
User avatar
Cruel_Ruin
Head Coach
Posts: 6,091
And1: 767
Joined: Nov 05, 2006
Location: The intersection of intellect, imagination and insanity
   

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#31 » by Cruel_Ruin » Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:53 pm

BrickDeez wrote:What!?! Posting the names of other guys that are far too reliant on their jumpshots doesn't prove that Hawes doesn't suffer from the same problem. What you're posting is nothing more than intellectually dishonest spin.


Spencer Hawes: 48% inside
Al Jefferson: 48% inside
Al Horford: 43% inside
Tim Duncan: 42% inside

I don't suppose the rest are jumpshooting stiffs either? :lol:
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#32 » by Smills91 » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:32 pm

CellarDoor wrote:Incidentally, how do Kings fans feel about their interior D as a whole? The one thing Tyrus brings that it seems like you guys are lacking is a very good weakside defender.


It could definitely improve, but I personally think that'll happen as Thompson and Hawes ripen and mature as players. Thompson is a solid big with good tenacity and IQ. Hawes needs to bulk up, but has good anticipation and instincts. I think a Hawes/Thompson duo up front has the potential to be a VERY good defensivie unit when they enter the primes. As far as a weakside defender, I'd want one of those as a 3rd big off the bench type. Trading Hawes for Thomas is (Please Use More Appropriate Word) as not only a downgrade in talent and potential, but it leaves the Kings centerless.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#33 » by Smills91 » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:37 pm

Cliff Levingston wrote:Cliff Levingston would pass from the Bulls' perspective. Tyrus is a higher upside player who probably won't reach his great potential, but at the very least, he's an expiring contract this year which helps clear space for a potential blockbuster free agent.

On top of that, Hawes wouldn't take the starting 5 job away from Noah while we also have Omer Asik slated to come to America for next season, so thanks but no thanks.


LOL Of course not, he'd relegate Noah to the 4 position as moving Tyrus leaves a big gap at the PF position.

Hypothetically, the Bulls starting line-up would be:
C: Hawes
PF: Noah
SF: Deng
SG: Salmons
PG: Rose

Too bad that'll never happen for the Bulls though, as that would be a dream, having an offensive power house younger than Noah beside him.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#34 » by Smills91 » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:41 pm

How about Donte Green for Joakim Noah. What the Bulls lose in reboudning and defense they make-up in athleticism, raw talent, versatility and potential.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,079
And1: 1,082
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#35 » by SacKingZZZ » Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:07 am

Rather see them together on the court, not traded for one another. How about a deal involving Thompson and Beno?
cdt3
Rookie
Posts: 1,183
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 17, 2008

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#36 » by cdt3 » Thu Oct 15, 2009 6:06 am

Down the last 2 months of last season when he started Hawes put up a 15/9/1.3blks. Some soft scrub center who shoots too many jump shots named Rasheed Wallace has career numbers of 15/7/1.4blks. Wallace is 6-11 230, Hawes is 7-1 245. Hawes is no scrawny guy and will have a very good career.
boogydown
Banned User
Posts: 26,221
And1: 15
Joined: Dec 14, 2004

Re: Bulls/Kings 

Post#37 » by boogydown » Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:06 am

Obviously Chicago says yes. Why do they need Hawes when they have Noah though? Kings need a center, not a PF.

Just a terrible thought process to this trade.

Return to Trades and Transactions