RJM wrote:heat4life wrote:RJM wrote:
I'm not one to herald a roster cast-off like Mullens as the second coming of Jack Sikma (I'll never be that guy), but I think it's fair to say that he's much more talented and athletic than that White #7 stiff we have stealing money on that bench. I'd rather have a more talented player in Mullens shooting threes and moving around the floor in limited minutes than Hamilton any day. He's actually seven feet and doesn't have T-Rex arms.
I agree with your assessment in regards to the overall talent. However, while JHam has a limited ceiling due to athleticism/toughness, he is at least a hard worker and has a higher BBIQ limited only by his lack of athleticism. He is a Todd Fuller-type. With Mullens, while more skilled offensively and a bit more athletic, he is also a low BBIQ player with a questionable work ethic and sub par defense. Reminds me of Adam Morrison
I am all for giving Mullens a look at the NBADL level. Maybe something can be done, but as an organization, I am not ready to cut a hard working player (although athletically limited) for someone unproven like Mullens. It is not the type of example the team wants to deliver when they ask young players to work hard and allow themselves to be coached for a shot at valuable roster spot in the big leagues.
He might be a hard worker, but he doesn't contribute anything in his minutes. Not a consistent deep shooter, doesn't rebound, isn't athletic, gets chewed up and spat out by any competent big man, isn't much of a defender, and can't contend with any NBA-level talent otherwise. He's just not good enough. If that's the case, I'd rather someone with something that's NBA-worthy. His hard work doesn't produce anything on the floor because his talent isn't on par with anything or anyone. That's the reality of this guy.
Remember Juwan Howard? His value was eventually seen, explaining why he managed a roster spot for two years. White #7 doesn't really have any redeeming qualities from what I understand. Seems like he's just a placeholder a la Gerald Fitch in 2006 until something better comes around. Again, I'm not saying Mullens needs to replace Hamilton right away though. He just seems like a super-cheap call-up if Miami does move Cole/Hamilton if no one better is available.
I agree, we can do better with that spot than JHam. I am not advocating to keep him. All I am saying is that his only purpose on the roster right now is as a reward for the hard work he put in. As an organization, that resonates with the young guys. I do think the team replaces him when a more qualified option is available. JHam had his shot and fell short talent wise IMO.