ImageImage

PGT: Blazers at Bucks

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

User avatar
SupremeHustle
RealGM
Posts: 28,329
And1: 30,717
Joined: Feb 11, 2005
Location: Cloud 9
 

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#16 » by SupremeHustle » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:30 am

GET HEALTHY MICHAEL REDD!
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
Jammo29
Pro Prospect
Posts: 970
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 23, 2008
Location: hunting 'squatches

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#17 » by Jammo29 » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:31 am

BLKOUT wrote:Salmons: The reason this game was lost. You don't shoot 2-14 and miss 10 in a row, along with offering NOTHING else. He was garbage from start to finish and every time the team looked like it might go on a bit of a run he stepped up to brick a shot and put a stop to that.

Gooden: His numbers look awful but he was playing with some effort on D and passing the ball, that's all I really want out of him.

Bogut: **** game. He had way more than 1 turnover, should've had 10-12 points the first quarter. Didn't rebound particuarly well. He looks heavy, slow and passive. It is frustrating as hell to see other C's taking steps forward while Bogut's apparently running in place or going backwards. I also don't mention his injury because he shoots with his left hand so it has no impact on that, and his left-handed shots have looked bad. At least his shot blocking is still there though.

Jennings: Right in there behind Salmons. 2-7 shooting, 6 turnovers... just not good enough. The back-up PG isn't good enough for Jennings to be playing like this.

Delfino: Good game. Few dumb mistakes but he's the only person really earning his roster spot night in and night out.

Maggete: YOU. SHOOT. TOO. MUCH. He got to the line 8 times which is great, but 12 shots in 17 minutes?

Anyway, onto the next one.


I think the injury needs to be referenced in regards to his general conditioning. It's clear he's not 'match fit' yet, and that will affect the way he moves but also the intensity that he will play with at times. I don't know how long this will still be an issue but i would have thought that it least the first month of the season we are going to see a slower than usual Bogut.
http://www.katelwatson.blogspot.com <<- click here for a better life
User avatar
Buck You
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,555
And1: 541
Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Location: Illinois
     

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#18 » by Buck You » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:31 am

Just a terrible game. Portland is a better team than us but losing like that, no excuse. Salmons was so bad, I think he needs to not play as much until he is in game shape because right now he's not helping the team at all. Brockman hustles but he's pretty useless, he's too small for his position. I still think the team will be alright but right now they are playing like garbo.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,002
And1: 14,887
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#19 » by Ayt » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:32 am

40 wins?
verticalhops
Senior
Posts: 680
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 18, 2009
Location: Boston

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#20 » by verticalhops » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:32 am

I know we lost and all, but something positive on the side note.... TA18 has finally been suspended, the serial Bogut versus Wade, Bogut versus Carmello thread maker :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Nebula1
RealGM
Posts: 27,829
And1: 1,571
Joined: Aug 06, 2005
Location: Underground King
 

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#21 » by Nebula1 » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:33 am

These losses are why you can't lose to Minnesota.
User avatar
blkout
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,689
And1: 1,914
Joined: Dec 12, 2005
Location: Melbourne
 

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#22 » by blkout » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:34 am

verticalhops wrote:I know we lost and all, but something positive on the side note.... TA18 has finally been suspended, the serial Bogut versus Wade, Bogut versus Carmello thread maker :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Thank God. Something good to happen today.
Image
User avatar
Buck You
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,555
And1: 541
Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Location: Illinois
     

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#23 » by Buck You » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:34 am

Also, the team really misses CDR imo. We could really use him off the bench.
NerdsterBuck
Junior
Posts: 254
And1: 8
Joined: Feb 11, 2010
Location: From Parts Unknown
         

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#24 » by NerdsterBuck » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:34 am

Wow this team is horrible. Chicago without Boozer were able to beat the Blazers. The Bucks on the other hand were well rested. I think the signing of Gooden and the trade of Maggette were just horrible on the management part. Two guys that were never known to be good defenders. I haven't seen Maggette jump to challenge shooters, or become passionate on the defensive end. Also not liking the double down defense, as we are being murdered the 3's.
MilBucksBackOnTop06
Banned User
Posts: 12,827
And1: 14
Joined: Nov 10, 2005

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#25 » by MilBucksBackOnTop06 » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:34 am

Too many of the same type of players.

AND I WILL TELL YOU ALL THIS...you dont want to hear it or read it but this team needed a guy like Michael Redd tonite who could hit shots.

I would not have signed Salmons. Hell, we might have been better off with Bell and Gadzuric and just gotten Dooling and Gooden and kept all our draft picks.

Wrong mix...
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#26 » by paul » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:35 am

drew881 wrote:Too bad we weren't the team with a pair to throw a contract at Wes Matthews...Hope Salmons gets healthy and can play well this year, because without him we are screwed.


Wes got found on a few cuts for some WIDE open layups that made his line look decent, but he really didn't play very well and that remains a pretty awful deal at this stage, time will tell how it pans out.


Anyway we are legitimately playing like one of the worst handful of teams in the league right now. They need to turn this sh*t around or we're going to find ourselves in a big hole in a big hurry.

Bogut was passive and couldn't catch the ball (should have had another TO as well), I still think we aren't going to him nearly enough in the post though. Without question our best offense last season stemmed from him catching on the low block - I don't know if Skiles thought it would just happen with the new guys but he needs to ditch the Gooden/Salmons iso crap and get back to what works. His D was OK.

Jennings looked awful tonight. He was biting on pump fakes from Miller and gave some really really sh*t passes.

Salmons is a liability until he gets in shape. He's hurting FAR more than he's helping, CDR going down is our biggest problem right now.

Delfino another good game, though got torched a bit on D in the 2nd and 3rd.

Gooden both good and bad. Though the good was only OK and the bad was pretty bad.

Maggette shot too much, but hell someone other than Salmons had to.
turbo2k
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,316
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 14, 2010
         

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#27 » by turbo2k » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:38 am

BLKOUT wrote:Gooden: His numbers look awful but he was playing with some effort on D and passing the ball, that's all I really want out of him.

Was going to post how there was too much Gooden hate in the GT (shocking I know), but I was surprised to read someone give him some credit. In all honesty, from what I saw, he was 1 of our better players tonight. Pleasantly surprised by his D.
Overall, not nearly as down as everyone else, I am expecting us to continue to struggle for a couple weeks. Salmons back will be key. Hopefully Skiles can tone down Mags jump shooting a bit. Everything else is going about as expected TBH, other than Salmons play which I thought would start coming around by now. So far this season as I see it:
Pleasantly surprised by: Jennings overall play does seem improved, would like to see him penetrate more frequently. LRMAM's offense has also looked improved over last season, which would make me a very happy fan. Gooden's D has not been nearly as bad as was initially expected or as bad as most people have been complaining about on this board, I would put it at around average D (with times where he does dip below average, hardly ever above average). And of course Delfino :)
Dissappointed by: Mags overall, D has been terrible at times (much worse than Gooden), chucking jumpers and 3pts (I thought he had quit those last year?), Dooling = rubbish, Salmons has been BAAAADDD, Ersan has been no where, Gooden's O is much worse than I was expecting, I am hoping Skiles will beat some of it out of him.
As expected: Brockman, Sanders, Bogut, Team lacking chemistry both on D and O, THIS WILL TAKE TIME PEOPLE!
Season projection: Still where I was in the offseason, between 46-48 wins. If this team can click, it will be good.
Newz wrote:I would also like it to be known that David Lee has not won an ESPY yet. This is **** ridiculous and it is obvious that they are doing it just to put him down. He should win all awards.
David Lee = Robbed again.

http://www.saveourbucks.com
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#28 » by paul » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:38 am

Buck You wrote:Just a terrible game. Portland is a better team than us but losing like that, no excuse. Salmons was so bad, I think he needs to not play as much until he is in game shape because right now he's not helping the team at all. Brockman hustles but he's pretty useless, he's too small for his position. I still think the team will be alright but right now they are playing like garbo.


Portland should NOT be a better team than us, that shouldn't just be a throwaway line used as an excuse. We are built to win today, there should be MAYBE 4 teams in the entire league we can dismiss as being just a better team than us. This isn't last season.
User avatar
pasting_monkeys
Starter
Posts: 2,090
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 22, 2006
Location: Where women glow and men plunder...

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#29 » by pasting_monkeys » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:40 am

Buck You wrote:Also, the team really misses CDR imo. We could really use him off the bench.


Couldn't agree more, would have loved to see him in there instead of Salmons.
Prince12
RealGM
Posts: 12,327
And1: 2,750
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:
     

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#30 » by Prince12 » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:40 am

Just a horrible game to watch barring the first five minutes..offense was horrible and d was slow..so much we need to improve wont even bother going through it all.

Im really worried about our PG backup though i was never really happy with Dooling anyway but man i dont wna see him or Earl on the court at any time but when BJ is having a bad one thats who we are left with major problem..no real back up center and just a bunch of guys who cant shoot..

I still have faith in this team to be better then last years but early on this year our weaknesses are being shown up a hell of a lot more then they did last couple months of 09-10..
@mkebucksaus just kicking off. Give it a follow!

https://twitter.com/mkebucksaus
User avatar
tyland
Veteran
Posts: 2,592
And1: 425
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
Location: Australia
Contact:
     

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#31 » by tyland » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:40 am

This team seems to be going as Salmons goes at the moment. As we have no adequate back-up behind Salmons at present with CDR injured, we are really struggling. Hopefully Salmons hits form sooner rather than later.

Still waiting for Dooling and Maggette to click in the system. Part of me thinks we may need to start Moute at the 4 and let Corey and Drew be our offense off the bench. A rotation along the lines of:

Bogut - Gooden/Brockman
Moute - Ersan/Gooden
Del3no - Maggette
Salmons - Maggette/Dooling
Jennings - Dooling/Boykins

At least until Salmons is healthy and CDR is back with the team.

The disruptive pre-season is really taking it's toll now. Lack of conditioning, rusty shooting, depth issues. Going to be a slow start it appears
SAVE OUR BUCKS
Twitter: @thetytimes
fabio
Veteran
Posts: 2,553
And1: 173
Joined: Jul 18, 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#32 » by fabio » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:40 am

BLKOUT wrote:Salmons: The reason this game was lost. You don't shoot 2-14 and miss 10 in a row, along with offering NOTHING else. He was garbage from start to finish and every time the team looked like it might go on a bit of a run he stepped up to brick a shot and put a stop to that.

Gooden: His numbers look awful but he was playing with some effort on D and passing the ball, that's all I really want out of him.

Bogut: **** game. He had way more than 1 turnover, should've had 10-12 points the first quarter. Didn't rebound particuarly well. He looks heavy, slow and passive. It is frustrating as hell to see other C's taking steps forward while Bogut's apparently running in place or going backwards. I also don't mention his injury because he shoots with his left hand so it has no impact on that, and his left-handed shots have looked bad. At least his shot blocking is still there though.

Jennings: Right in there behind Salmons. 2-7 shooting, 6 turnovers... just not good enough. The back-up PG isn't good enough for Jennings to be playing like this.

Delfino: Good game. Few dumb mistakes but he's the only person really earning his roster spot night in and night out.

Maggete: YOU. SHOOT. TOO. MUCH. He got to the line 8 times which is great, but 12 shots in 17 minutes?

Anyway, onto the next one.


I agree with everything but Delfino's view. I don't consider he was a reason for the loss, BUT I think he has some responsibility, as weird as it sounds. I mean, it was pretty clear Jennings wouldn't give him the ball even if his life was on it, but he has options to shoot, and he didn't take those. I mean, come on, game is going down the drain, you're the most effective player in the roster, grow some balls and shoot, try to glue the team and carry it over your shoulders. If from the 26 shots Salmons and Maggette took for a whooping 6-26 he had shot only 5-6, I think we'd be telling a different story.
This is something we always blamed Carlos about, and I really thought he was all over it, but it seems he has relapses, so to speak

What you didn't mention about Salmons and Maggette and was what really drove me nuts was the absolute lack of D. I know they aren't good defenders, but I'm pretty sure I never saw such an amazing display of lack of D from them, not a single time

on a side note, I assume Miller and Johnson are also bad match-ups, same as DJ Augustine was
turbo2k
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,316
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 14, 2010
         

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#33 » by turbo2k » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:41 am

Oh but Portland is a better team than us until we gel, don't get why this is making everyone mad. Lot's of new faces and injuries to deal with. I AM dissappointed by the seemingly low effort by some of the guys though.

Anyone know what tonights attendance was? Was it really as bad as some of the people were saying?
Newz wrote:I would also like it to be known that David Lee has not won an ESPY yet. This is **** ridiculous and it is obvious that they are doing it just to put him down. He should win all awards.
David Lee = Robbed again.

http://www.saveourbucks.com
Prince12
RealGM
Posts: 12,327
And1: 2,750
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:
     

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#34 » by Prince12 » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:44 am

Nebula1 wrote:These losses are why you can't lose to Minnesota.


Agreed thats why i started that 'slow start' thread couple weeks ago.
I could see this was going to happen although i probably assumed wed start 4-3 (after the NO home game)
but right now we will probably be 2-5 maybe 3-4 if were lucky so with the rugged December coming up we doo not wna let this slide to long
@mkebucksaus just kicking off. Give it a follow!

https://twitter.com/mkebucksaus
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,641
And1: 27,162
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: PGT: Blazers at Bucks 

Post#35 » by trwi7 » Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:44 am

It's listed as 13,087, but it didn't even look close to that.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks