yardbarker

PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

ImageImage

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby xTitan on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:15 pm

What I find hilarious is if the Bucks drafted Udoh with a top 10 lottery pick and he has played like he has played so far,. he would be despised and hated, because he really doesn't do much for being a top 10 pick. I hope Udoh starts every game the rest of the year, at some point they will meet quality competition, then we can all see what he is made of, good or bad.
User avatar
xTitan
RealGM
 
Posts: 11618
And1: 5
Joined: Mar 3, 2006
Location: West Allis,WI

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby paul on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:16 pm

MiltownMadness wrote:
-Jragon- wrote:
Max Green wrote:Udoh with 11-8 and 2 blocks in his second start with the team.


+ several alters and deflections leading to turnovers and rebounds.

Definitely does all the little things. Think that is what I like about him the most.

Pretty sure the most moronic thing I have read on this forum is that a few posters were saying they would rather have Gooden then Udoh. Like wtf?


Who said that? Most people on the board would rather have herpes than Gooden.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
 
Posts: 27679
And1: 37
Joined: Dec 11, 2007

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby cellomac1212 on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:17 pm

paul wrote:
smooth 'lil balla wrote:Monta getting grilled for D on a night where he scores the last 16 points to close out the game. Only on the Bucks board.


Yeah, his direct opponent having 27/7/4 on 80% shooting wasn't important anyway, had nothing to do with why a team featuring 5 D-League level guys and a couple of way over the hill veterans took us right down to the wire.


I think the closest the game got was 6 points and was consistently around 15 points... With a consistent 15 point lead against a bad team, I don't think most players are going to be trying to push the lead to 40 on the back end of a back to back, one day off, and another back to back. When the Bucks wanted to turn it on, they could and they did...
User avatar
cellomac1212
Analyst
 
Posts: 3461
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 12, 2011

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby -Jragon- on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:17 pm

paul wrote:
smooth 'lil balla wrote:Monta getting grilled for D on a night where he scores the last 16 points to close out the game. Only on the Bucks board.


Yeah, his direct opponent having 27/7/4 on 80% shooting wasn't important anyway, had nothing to do with why a team featuring 5 D-League level guys and a couple of way over the hill veterans took us right down to the wire.


5 D league guys; come on Paul. Teams very often play good team basketball when their star is out and play some very good games (Redd and Melo injuries for example). We'd all be excited to have Gee and Tristan Thompson getting minutes on our team plus Jamison and Parker can shoot in streaks.
User avatar
-Jragon-
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1834
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 7, 2005
Location: It's my year

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby AussieBuck on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:17 pm

Checked all of Parker's shots out. There was one play where he had to go around 2 screens the rest were curls where he trailed behind Parker or plays where he just got caught ball watching. Parker also make one shot on Dunleavy. Monta got torched because he was lazy and not paying attention.
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
 
Posts: 17167
And1: 45
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Drew ****ing Gooden

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby msiris on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:18 pm

Anybody here still want to bet me that the Bucks will not make it pass the first round? I didnt think so. :D Yeah FTD2.
Your Milwaukee Bucks. Where the 8th Seed = the only goal for the Milwaukee Bucks.
User avatar
msiris
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 5502
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Central Wisconsin

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby MiltownMadness on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:18 pm

paul wrote:
MiltownMadness wrote:
-Jragon- wrote:+ several alters and deflections leading to turnovers and rebounds.

Definitely does all the little things. Think that is what I like about him the most.

Pretty sure the most moronic thing I have read on this forum is that a few posters were saying they would rather have Gooden then Udoh. Like wtf?


Who said that? Most people on the board would rather have herpes than Gooden.

Ill-yasova I know said it for a fact. He hates Udoh for whatever reason. I recall two or so people agreeing with him in the thread.

I'm sure that opinion has changed since then. It was only a week or two ago though.
lazfa199 wrote:I don't buy into the Davis hype either. Best case scenario he becomes a poor mans Bismack Biyombo -____-
User avatar
MiltownMadness
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1622
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 23, 2010

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby pumpfake ersan on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:19 pm

why you discuss that, you all know that skiles let gooden play, and thats the right decision
pumpfake ersan
Pro Prospect
 
Posts: 837
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 20, 2012

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby wichmae on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:20 pm

AussieBuck wrote:Checked all of Parker's shots out. There was one play where he had to go around 2 screens the rest were curls where he trailed behind Parker or plays where he just got caught ball watching. Parker also make one shot on Dunleavy. Monta got torched because he was lazy and not paying attention.

I just looked too and that is not at all what I saw.
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
 
Posts: 11652
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby White+Purple on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:22 pm

paul wrote:Who said that? Most people on the board would rather have herpes than Gooden.

It's true - most NBA players won't go to the rim when faced with herpes. The same can't be said of Gooden.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:Hammond is a nut.
User avatar
White+Purple
Senior
 
Posts: 740
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 20, 2012
Location: Draft time

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby MiltownMadness on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:23 pm

xTitan wrote:What I find hilarious is if the Bucks drafted Udoh with a top 10 lottery pick and he has played like he has played so far,. he would be despised and hated, because he really doesn't do much for being a top 10 pick. I hope Udoh starts every game the rest of the year, at some point they will meet quality competition, then we can all see what he is made of, good or bad.

I think I have him figured out already.

Pros:
One of the best help defenders in the league
Does all the little things.
Developing a nice mid range jumper


Cons:
Hands of stone
Not a good rebounder for his size at all, which goes with the poor hands.
Poor offensive game, but could develop to be solid at least.
lazfa199 wrote:I don't buy into the Davis hype either. Best case scenario he becomes a poor mans Bismack Biyombo -____-
User avatar
MiltownMadness
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1622
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 23, 2010

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby paul on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:24 pm

-Jragon- wrote:
paul wrote:
smooth 'lil balla wrote:Monta getting grilled for D on a night where he scores the last 16 points to close out the game. Only on the Bucks board.


Yeah, his direct opponent having 27/7/4 on 80% shooting wasn't important anyway, had nothing to do with why a team featuring 5 D-League level guys and a couple of way over the hill veterans took us right down to the wire.


5 D league guys; come on Paul. Teams very often play good team basketball when their star is out and play some very good games (Redd and Melo injuries for example). We'd all be excited to have Gee and Tristan Thompson getting minutes on our team plus Jamison and Parker can shoot in streaks.


Sloan
Hudson
Samuels
Walton
Erden
Harangody
Harris

That's 7 D-League level guys, I was being polite.

Parker was a good solid role player 5 years ago, now he averages 21ppg less than he scored tonight on ugly percentages.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
 
Posts: 27679
And1: 37
Joined: Dec 11, 2007

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby AussieBuck on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:24 pm

wichmae wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:Checked all of Parker's shots out. There was one play where he had to go around 2 screens the rest were curls where he trailed behind Parker or plays where he just got caught ball watching. Parker also make one shot on Dunleavy. Monta got torched because he was lazy and not paying attention.

I just looked too and that is not at all what I saw.

LOL
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
 
Posts: 17167
And1: 45
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Drew ****ing Gooden

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby cellomac1212 on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:25 pm

wichmae wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:Checked all of Parker's shots out. There was one play where he had to go around 2 screens the rest were curls where he trailed behind Parker or plays where he just got caught ball watching. Parker also make one shot on Dunleavy. Monta got torched because he was lazy and not paying attention.

I just looked too and that is not at all what I saw.

Monta was screened nearly every play... Of course some shots came after the initial screen, but chasing a player around a court all night while fighting through screens is going to slow most people down... Especially while you consistently are up by 15...

Doesn't matter though cause at the end of the night, only Bucks fans are going to remember this as a night where Monta played bad D and the rest of the world is going to praise Monta for scoring 16 straight points to win a game... BTW, the company of players that can pull that off are pretty much all superstars so it kind of should be commended instead of dragged through the dirt...
User avatar
cellomac1212
Analyst
 
Posts: 3461
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 12, 2011

Re: PG: Bucks beat Cavs: 3-GWS, 7-4 since trade.....

Postby paul on Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:25 pm

AussieBuck wrote:Checked all of Parker's shots out. There was one play where he had to go around 2 screens the rest were curls where he trailed behind Parker or plays where he just got caught ball watching. Parker also make one shot on Dunleavy. Monta got torched because he was lazy and not paying attention.


Bad defense is only bad defense if it happens while your opponent is standing directly in front of you with the ball in his hands. Wake the hell up.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
 
Posts: 27679
And1: 37
Joined: Dec 11, 2007

PreviousNext

Return to Milwaukee Bucks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bad Midget, Chapter29, DocHoliday, KidA24, MoneyInDaBank07, RickInCali, Shmimon, SugarRay34, WEFFPIM, WiscoKing13