ImageImage

PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 30,287
And1: 3,999
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Location: Monta Ellis have it all.
 

PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#1 » by Baddy Chuck » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:15 am

Meh.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
The Wet Whistle
Analyst
Posts: 3,037
And1: 283
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
Location: Dude, where's my stealth tank?
   

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#2 » by The Wet Whistle » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:16 am

love the title of the thread lol
Ill-yasova wrote:I was comfortable with my sexuality until Carlos Delfino fixed his gaze on me and I immediately became pregnant. How am I supposed to deal with that?
User avatar
Max Green
RealGM
Posts: 11,918
And1: 1,399
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Optimist Ave.
 

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#3 » by Max Green » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:17 am

Our starting backcourt & Beno showed up tonight, everyone else was outmatched and played pretty bad.
Vice President of Parker-Nation.
#OwnTheFuture
User avatar
Captain Erv
General Manager
Posts: 8,110
And1: 69
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Contact:
     

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#4 » by Captain Erv » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:17 am

My favorite part was when Monta got blazed by Felton on a drive to the basket then watch him miss a layup, get his own rebound, and score. Also, special mention to 2010-2011 Larry Sanders showing up tonight.
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 13,886
And1: 2,059
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: AZ
     

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#5 » by JayMKE » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:17 am

Image

stealth tank ftw
FREE GIANNIS
User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 23,727
And1: 4,499
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
Location: Aussie bias
     

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#6 » by blazza18 » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:18 am

We missed Gooden tonight.
Image
trwi7 wrote:Nah, I prefer touching real men.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 31,962
And1: 867
Joined: Dec 11, 2007

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#7 » by paul » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:19 am

Chicago completely sh*tting the bed on what should have been a blowout loss is the only thing even vaguely masking that we have been playing terrible basketball with a middling roster and a coach who is completely lost the past couple of weeks.
User avatar
ComeBackRay34
Sophomore
Posts: 219
And1: 10
Joined: Jun 10, 2009
Location: 9th seed hell

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#8 » by ComeBackRay34 » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:19 am

Really not happy about that Bulls win now. Lose that game and this one could have been Skiles' last. That game bought him time that probably he didn't even want. :roll:
"Monta Ellis have it all" ~ from the Great One who's only difference from Wade is winning games, an all-star appearance, two championship rings, and two gold medals.
jeremyd236
General Manager
Posts: 7,930
And1: 16
Joined: Jan 07, 2005
Location: Appleton, WI

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#9 » by jeremyd236 » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:19 am

You'd rather see Lamb play than win games? At least finally somebody has stated what is implied in every thread.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 31,962
And1: 867
Joined: Dec 11, 2007

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#10 » by paul » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:21 am

Special shoutout to Fat Sammy for the worst display of help defense I've seen since we last dropped 120 on Wilt Lopez's Nets.

The tape should be shown publicly while he sits in front of the TV in a dunce cap.
User avatar
Dick Tate
Pro Prospect
Posts: 765
And1: 9
Joined: Aug 17, 2006

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#11 » by Dick Tate » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:22 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:More blowouts if it means more Lamb


Not if it means Daniels gets more minutes than Harris and Henson combined.
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 13,886
And1: 2,059
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: AZ
     

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#12 » by JayMKE » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:22 am

jeremyd236 wrote:You'd rather see Lamb play than win games? At least finally somebody has stated what is implied in every thread.


We'd probably win more with Lamb than Monta tbf

but ya

tanks away
FREE GIANNIS
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 67,257
And1: 2,203
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#13 » by LUKE23 » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:22 am

Now being outscored by 2 on the season. Projects as a .500 team, which is probably what we are.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 30,287
And1: 3,999
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Location: Monta Ellis have it all.
 

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#14 » by Baddy Chuck » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:23 am

jeremyd236 wrote:You'd rather see Lamb play than win games? At least finally somebody has stated what is implied in every thread.

Considering I don't think we're going to win more games then we lose, I would love to see the ones we do lose be blowouts so the young guys can get some burn.

Our veterans aren't going to lead us any where, we need our young players to grow.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 31,962
And1: 867
Joined: Dec 11, 2007

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#15 » by paul » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:23 am

Dick Tate wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:More blowouts if it means more Lamb


Not if it means Daniels gets more minutes than Harris and Henson combined.


That's why we don't let Scotty have old things.
User avatar
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 13,471
And1: 366
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#16 » by xTitan » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:24 am

Old Larry has been coming back a little more lately.....
User avatar
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 12,110
And1: 380
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: Wisconsin
       

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#17 » by Thunder Muscle » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:25 am

Woelful on a crusade right now.

Calling Bucks embarrassing after players walking to locker room before buzzer sounded. Called out Skiles for not playing 8M man (I assume Ersan) only 13 minutes. Said something has to give before it gets ugly.
TBD
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 30,287
And1: 3,999
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Location: Monta Ellis have it all.
 

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#18 » by Baddy Chuck » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:25 am

paul wrote:That's why we don't let Scotty have old things.

Yeah anyone without the preseason blinders saw hm stealing minutes from Lamb/Harris from day 1.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 31,962
And1: 867
Joined: Dec 11, 2007

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#19 » by paul » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:27 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
paul wrote:That's why we don't let Scotty have old things.

Yeah anyone without the preseason blinders saw hm stealing minutes from Lamb/Harris from day 1.


Yeah, even though there's no evidence to suggest Skiles has ever favored vets over young guys :D

(who was that again?)
User avatar
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 12,110
And1: 380
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: Wisconsin
       

Re: PG: More blowouts if it means more Lamb 

Post#20 » by Thunder Muscle » Thu Nov 29, 2012 3:28 am

Ellis or Jennings need to go though. Bad combo if those are going to be your top volume shooters. I know it is stating the obvious, but I don't think it's going to work. If you can get a 1st round for one, do it, and roll with Udrih/Lamb/Jennings as your PG/SG combo the rest of the year, mix in Dunleavy.
TBD

Return to Milwaukee Bucks