yardbarker

Milwaukee Bucks Best Individual Seasons (Since 1984-1985)

# Season Player Pos MINFGMFGA3PM3PAFTMFTAREBASTSTLBLKPTS
12006-2007Michael ReddSF38.59.0019.342.215.776.517.853.702.341.190.1726.72
22005-2006Michael ReddSG39.18.5318.952.045.166.267.144.282.861.190.0625.35
31984-1985Terry CummingsPF34.59.6119.390.000.014.345.869.062.891.480.8523.56
41989-1990Ricky PierceSG29.08.5316.730.782.255.206.202.832.250.850.1223.03
52004-2005Michael ReddSG38.08.3318.911.393.914.925.764.162.290.840.1122.97
61988-1989Terry CummingsPF35.39.1219.540.090.194.535.758.122.481.320.9022.86

See best Milwaukee Bucks individual seasons

PG: We'll meet again in the finals!

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

Post#121 Re: PG: We'll meet again in the finals!
Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:55 pm by Baddy Chuck

CanadaBucks wrote:One guy I kind of like(and this would be in addition to Monta not instead of)is Gerald Henderson from Charlotte. Now what I would be willing to part with and what Charlotte would take...I don't know

I wouldn't mind him I guess but would you be willing to go even MLE type money to keep him after this season? I think he'd get more and at that price I'd let him walk.
Image
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 25,502
And1: 1,085
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Location: Monta Ellis have it all.
Top

Post#122 Re: PG: We'll meet again in the finals!
Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:38 pm by blkout

JimmyTheKid wrote:Anyway, how would that be considered an "agenda?" There are a lot of people who like Brandon Jennings' game.


You're right, it's not an agenda to have a positive opinion about someone. Just as the absolute reverse of that isn't an agenda either. There are people who don't like his game, or people who don't like Monta's, or people who don't like Ersan's etc... that's all it is, opinions. You label them agendas because you disagree with them.

Myself included. I'm not trying to break the bank for him but he deserves a contract much like the one Jrue Holiday just received.


Nope.

You seem to confuse agendas with people just flat out not liking a player's game, or being a harsh critic of what they do on the court. An agenda suggests people have some sort of motive or meaning behind it, like the motive behind their opinion isn't basketball related. What are these people trying to gain with the "agendas" you are accusing them of having?
Image
blkout

Forum Mod
Forum Mod
User avatar
Posts: 30,540
And1: 1,291
Joined: Dec 12, 2005
Location: Melbourne
Top

Post#123 Re: PG: We'll meet again in the finals!
Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:39 pm by blkout

CanadaBucks wrote:
Ayt wrote:You don't need to have an "agenda" to think Monta sucks at basketball. I'm appalled he's on my team playing major minutes. I can't stand his game.


But to say he sucks at basketball is factually incorrect. He would get minutes with any team in the NBA. But you certainly don't have to like him, his game or like him being on your team.


No one in the NBA "sucks at basketball" in the literal sense, that's just semantics.
Image
blkout

Forum Mod
Forum Mod
User avatar
Posts: 30,540
And1: 1,291
Joined: Dec 12, 2005
Location: Melbourne
Top

Post#124 Re: PG: We'll meet again in the finals!
Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:17 pm by AussieBuck

There's a few 7 footers that suck at basketball.
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
AussieBuck

RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 20,185
And1: 673
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: saveourbucks.com
Top

Post#125 Re: PG: We'll meet again in the finals!
Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:36 am by giraldo5

blkout wrote:Would like a conclusive list of all the Golden State fans please

Always loved them but didn't like Monta. Now with arguably one of my favorite players instead of Monta they are my 2nd favorite team easily.
Postby LUKE23 on Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:44 pm

In shape 18-22 year olds running out of gas? Hilarious.
giraldo5
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,376
And1: 41
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Top

Post#126 Re: PG: We'll meet again in the finals!
Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:44 am by GHOSTofSIKMA

blkout wrote:
JimmyTheKid wrote:Anyway, how would that be considered an "agenda?" There are a lot of people who like Brandon Jennings' game.


You're right, it's not an agenda to have a positive opinion about someone. Just as the absolute reverse of that isn't an agenda either. There are people who don't like his game, or people who don't like Monta's, or people who don't like Ersan's etc... that's all it is, opinions. You label them agendas because you disagree with them.


it becomes an agenda when you grind an axe over it. saying jennings is a star or saying jennings sucks in every 2nd post when jennings name comes up is an agenda.

we all have opinions. and we all make them known. its an agenda when you act like a dick about it every time a name resurfaces. and thats especially if your the one constantly bringing up that name in general discussion.
Brandon Knight.... been balling. Over his last 64 games(updated 4/13)
34.4 mpg.. .426 fg%.. .329 3pt%.. .526 ts%.. 5.0 apg.. 3.8 rpg.. 18.9 ppg
GHOSTofSIKMA



General Manager
User avatar
Posts: 9,167
And1: 221
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
Location: NC
Top

Previous

Return to Milwaukee Bucks


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: [MIKE C], bwpn gold, DocHoliday, FrieAaron, humanrefutation, JayMKE, JustinCredible, KidA24, Max Green, MVP2110, PkrsBcksGphsMqt, Ron Swanson, skones, steger_3434