yardbarker

PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

ImageImage

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby Max Green on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:03 pm

Baddy Chuck wrote:
Max Green wrote:Funny yet sad that Fat Daly played himself right out of the rotation. If we are going to make a trade at the deadline he's most likely going to be the one traded.

I'd still love to make a push for Gasol. Having that post scorer would do wonders for our team. I'd just sell them on depth. Monta, Dunleavy, Beno, Dalembert, Ersan, Udoh, whatever of that they want really.



Yeah, same here. It would actually be a more then fair trade if the Lakers chose the right combination of the players you mentioned.
User avatar
Max Green
General Manager
 
Posts: 8134
And1: 20
Joined: Jul 3, 2007
Location: Optimist Ave.

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby LUKE23 on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:06 pm

Max Green wrote:We've already beat one. How is it a barometer game, we're undermanned coming off of a back to back against one of the best teams in the league?


We haven't beaten a homecourt team yet with Monta (I'm talking teams currently in the top 4 seeds or that finished top 4 seeds last year). I feel it is a barometer game because we've won four in a row but the team is still kind of just struggling to pull out the wins and we haven't played a great team over that stretch.
Jim Paschke ‏@Paschketball 6 Apr
I just wish everyone could enjoy the ride. I see both sides believe me. Seed and situation never concern me. It's in or out. That's all


#8 seed first round series W-L since 1983-84: 4-54
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
 
Posts: 59503
And1: 46
Joined: May 25, 2005
Location: Stunville

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby SkilesTheLimit on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:19 pm

To their credit, the Bucks seem to be beating up on the bad teams this year as they should. With the East as weak as it is they could end up with a .500+ record, but its games like LAC tomorrow that will separate pretenders vs. contenders. Let's see if they show up.
SkilesTheLimit
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1624
And1: 8
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby CanadaBucks on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:37 pm

Ok, so if they lose tomorrow they suck.
User avatar
CanadaBucks
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1640
And1: 14
Joined: Sep 14, 2012

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby blazza18 on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 pm

CanadaBucks wrote:Ok, so if they lose tomorrow they suck.


Now your getting it.
Where mediocrity happens
User avatar
blazza18
General Manager
 
Posts: 8735
And1: 61
Joined: Dec 2, 2010
Location: Land of Aus

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby CanadaBucks on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:42 pm

blazza18 wrote:
CanadaBucks wrote:Ok, so if they lose tomorrow they suck.


Now your getting it.

But I don't want it
User avatar
CanadaBucks
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1640
And1: 14
Joined: Sep 14, 2012

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby paulpressey25 on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:49 pm

If you guys recall the 2005-06 season around here, during the Epi battles he brought up some statistic that most teams usually always get a 4 game winning streak at some point. The team that year never did and finished 40-42.

Tonight we got our four game streak.
When Krause said he didn’t feel that the season could be called a good one since we fell short of the playoffs, Paschke rightly reminded him that there are 14 upstanding teams that didn’t make the playoffs. Made me proud that we could be among them.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 37259
And1: 44
Joined: Oct 26, 2002
Location: "John Hammond, my word is stronger than oak!" -Danny Ferry

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby jeremyd236 on Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:55 pm

This game was ugly. We blew an 18 point 2nd quarter lead (I think), because Irving/Gibson exploded at the 3 point line and nobody (Jennings/Ellis) decided to contest their shots.

With that said, Ellis was our only offensive option down the stretch, and it was sad. He hit the long 2's tonight, but that doesn't mean they were good shots.
jeremyd236
General Manager
 
Posts: 7857
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 6, 2005
Location: Appleton, WI

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby ampd on Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:03 am

LUKE23 wrote:
Max Green wrote:We've already beat one. How is it a barometer game, we're undermanned coming off of a back to back against one of the best teams in the league?


We haven't beaten a homecourt team yet with Monta (I'm talking teams currently in the top 4 seeds or that finished top 4 seeds last year). I feel it is a barometer game because we've won four in a row but the team is still kind of just struggling to pull out the wins and we haven't played a great team over that stretch.


The team is back to looking more like the win ugly Skiles ball that we got used to before we started playing Gooden at C last season. The alarming thing though is that our defensive rebounding and transition game / pace have tailed off. We are down to 9th in fast break points from 1st.
User avatar
ampd
General Manager
 
Posts: 8306
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 6, 2010

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby AussieBuck on Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:05 am

Max Green wrote:Funny yet sad that Fat Daly played himself right out of the rotation. If we are going to make a trade at the deadline he's most likely going to be the one traded.

Eh, it was always going to happen if Skiles didn't have his head up his ass about it. He's really not very good.
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
 
Posts: 17155
And1: 45
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Drew ****ing Gooden

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby Baddy Chuck on Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:06 am

jeremyd236 wrote:This game was ugly. We blew an 18 point 2nd quarter lead (I think), because Irving/Gibson exploded at the 3 point line and nobody (Jennings/Ellis) decided to contest their shots.

With that said, Ellis was our only offensive option down the stretch, and it was sad. He hit the long 2's tonight, but that doesn't mean they were good shots.

Yup. Brandon lowered his TS% to a disgusting 49.7% and Monta raised his to an atrocious 48%. It really sucks having our offense rely on these two.

They have been atrocious this season.
Image
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
 
Posts: 20446
And1: 46
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Location: Monta Ellis have it all.

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby AussieBuck on Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:07 am

EastSideBucksFan wrote:I'm not a fan of Drew Gooden in the rotation over Henson or even Dalembert.

Monta Ellis shot well tonight, but the Cavs are terrible on defense. But good to see a good game out of Monta.


Jennings takes some awful shots. And he never gets fouls called by the refs. They seriously hate him.

Moute & Ilyasova are winning us games. Plain and simple. I love when they are on the court together.

Sanders had hands of stone tonight, but I'm not worried about him.

Jeff Grayson has a huge herpdog on his lip. I think he makes out with hookers.

Big gut check game tomorrow. If we aren't solid defensively Clippers will rout us.

Agreed with nearly all of this. I'm not so passionate about Jennings not getting calls though, other than the one where he drove to middle and got knocked down on a made shot he was just doing his typical falling away left and throwing his hands up if got a slight hip bump as he went out of court.
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
 
Posts: 17155
And1: 45
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Drew ****ing Gooden

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby El Duderino on Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:31 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
randy84 wrote:Kind of the same situation for Jennings. You know he is going to want at least $10 million a year.

Yup, I'm leaning more and more everyday towards shipping him out too. The "youth" aspect is the only thing keeping me on the fence but it's been 4 seasons with minimal improvement. I'd love to see him next to a legit SG before I make the move but that probably won't happen.


At this point, i want no part of giving Brandon any sort of four year deal in that 40 million range after the season, whether it's the Bucks making the offer or matching one in that range.

I agree with you that Jennings just hasn't shown enough significant improvement at pretty much any aspect of his game since his rookie year.

He's still only a 40% shooter that shoots to much given his inability to make shots at a better clip.

He still doesn't get to the free throw line.

His court vision is a little improved, but not to a point that makes him upper tier in that aspect to help compensate for his bad shooting.

On the defensive end he at least tries and all of the steals are good, but like so many other point guards, he struggles to limit penetration, especially against stronger guards given his slight frame.

I generally like Brandon on a personality level, at least from what i can see from afar as a fan. He seems to care about winning, almost always plays hard, and he talks about the city of Milwaukee in a positive way when interviewed both locally and nationally. He also stays healthy for the most part. As a player though, he just hasn't been able to improve enough at his shooting deficiencies and average court vision for me to want Jennings locked into the Bucks PG job over the next 4-5 years, much less at around 10 million per.
User avatar
El Duderino
RealGM
 
Posts: 15358
And1: 7
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby -Jragon- on Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:44 am

El Duderino wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:
randy84 wrote:Kind of the same situation for Jennings. You know he is going to want at least $10 million a year.

Yup, I'm leaning more and more everyday towards shipping him out too. The "youth" aspect is the only thing keeping me on the fence but it's been 4 seasons with minimal improvement. I'd love to see him next to a legit SG before I make the move but that probably won't happen.


At this point, i want no part of giving Brandon any sort of four year deal in that 40 million range after the season, whether it's the Bucks making the offer or matching one in that range.

I agree with you that Jennings just hasn't shown enough significant improvement at pretty much any aspect of his game since his rookie year.

He's still only a 40% shooter that shoots to much given his inability to make shots at a better clip.

He still doesn't get to the free throw line.

His court vision is a little improved, but not to a point that makes him upper tier in that aspect to help compensate for his bad shooting.

On the defensive end he at least tries and all of the steals are good, but like so many other point guards, he struggles to limit penetration, especially against stronger guards given his slight frame.

I generally like Brandon on a personality level, at least from what i can see from afar as a fan. He seems to care about winning, almost always plays hard, and he talks about the city of Milwaukee in a positive way when interviewed both locally and nationally. He also stays healthy for the most part. As a player though, he just hasn't been able to improve enough at his shooting deficiencies and average court vision for me to want Jennings locked into the Bucks PG job over the next 4-5 years, much less at around 10 million per.


Yup to this. When comparing Monta to Brandon, Monta seems to have great plays and bonehead plays. But even his bonehead plays are aggressive like pulling up a jumper he thinks he'll make or forcing a pass to a guy that's sort of open and he clearly understands the mental game of basketball.

Brandon, on the other hand, seems to make great physical, individual plays sometimes and plays with teammates conservatively limiting turnovers but he doesn't seem to mentally understand what a pick and roll or any other play should look like. It might all just be too hard for him like passing academic tests and passing a freshman year of college. Paying 10 million for someone that might never understand basketball is a huge force and mistake.

Controlling Monta is a coaches job similar to how coaches had to pull the reins on Brett Favre when he was great and thought he could do everything himself including force passes into triple coverage. This should be easy for Skiles (a tough coach) and Jennings would "get it" by now if he was going to.
User avatar
-Jragon-
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1833
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 7, 2005
Location: It's my year

Re: PG: Monta's swag on infinity

Postby Baddy Chuck on Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:01 am

-Jragon- wrote:Controlling Monta is a coaches job similar to how coaches had to pull the reins on Brett Favre when he was great and thought he could do everything himself including force passes into triple coverage. This should be easy for Skiles (a tough coach) and Jennings would "get it" by now if he was going to.

Oh come on, if Monta could be coached he wouldn't have been the same player for 8 years now. He is what he is, he is not going to change. We're 40 games into his time here and his game hasn't changed one bit, it's arguably getting worse. This sounds like the exact same arguments you (and other) made for Gooden last season. Saying that if Skiles could coach him into playing better defense and cutting down on the bonehead plays he would be useful. Players set in their ways very rarely change. I really hope Monta leaves whether through trade or free agency and people can finally look past him like you did Gooden.
Image
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
 
Posts: 20446
And1: 46
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Location: Monta Ellis have it all.

PreviousNext

Return to Milwaukee Bucks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BUCKnation, CanadaBucks, Epicurus, James1980, LUKE23, M-C-G, Newz, RandyBreuer, SpursNBucks, The Wet Whistle, Treebeard