ImageImage

Trades for the Bucks to blow it up

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 30,868
And1: 3,401
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
   

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#376 » by TyCobb » Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:32 pm

We do the same thing over on the Lakers board. :lol: Man this season sucks.

EDIT: I really do think the Bucks are the Lakers best potential trade partner though. Alot of different combinations can be done that make sense to both squads.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 67,259
And1: 2,203
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#377 » by LUKE23 » Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:33 pm

The Lakers won't need to take on salary to trade Pau is my guess. At the same time, I don't think they are in position to demand young assets at all either. Useful expirings is what I expect them to receive if Pau is moved.
Lippo
Starter
Posts: 2,136
And1: 101
Joined: Jun 15, 2006

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#378 » by Lippo » Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:33 pm

well its "Not Realistic" that the bucks will "Blow It Up".. so this whole thread is based on "Unrealistic Ideas".
Trades that have fair values and work in trade machines are fair game. They are however not predictions, when you do mock drafts in football, do you do what you would want and think best for the team.. or guess what TT would do?
User avatar
James1980
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,831
And1: 18
Joined: Jul 02, 2003
Location: Milwaukee
     

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#379 » by James1980 » Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:35 pm

There was a rumor a little while ago regarding LaMarcus Aldridge. Any way we could still get him? What would it take?
NotYoAvgNBAFan wrote:I overlook foolishness.
User avatar
jakecronus8
Head Coach
Posts: 7,486
And1: 1,489
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#380 » by jakecronus8 » Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:35 pm

LUKE23 wrote:The Lakers won't need to take on salary to trade Pau is my guess. At the same time, I don't think they are in position to demand young assets at all either. Useful expirings is what I expect them to receive if Pau is moved.

I wonder what they would think of a Ersan/Dalembert swap.
steger_3434 wrote:This organization is utter trash. The only reason I like this team is because I live here and the only reason I live here is because I'm stupid.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
RealGM
Posts: 58,172
And1: 3,780
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:
       

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#381 » by ReasonablySober » Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:38 pm

If LA wants Ellis, Daly or Udrih then sure. The Bucks would make for great trade partners.
Lippo
Starter
Posts: 2,136
And1: 101
Joined: Jun 15, 2006

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#382 » by Lippo » Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:39 pm

A prediction.. hmm
Bucks stand pat
Give Jennings 5/60m
Ellis/Udrih/Dale/Dunleavy walk next season for nothing
We sign Millsap for 4/58m
We sign Devin Harris for 3/20m
We sign Johny Flynn 2/4m
resign Daniels

Jennings/D.Harris/Flynn
D.Harris/Daniels/Lamb
T.Harris/Moute
Millsap/Ersan/Henson
Sanders/Udoh/Gooden/Pryz
User avatar
GHOSTofSIKMA
RealGM
Posts: 11,334
And1: 766
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: NC
     

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#383 » by GHOSTofSIKMA » Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:09 pm

if the lakers dont want salary back then ellis/ dalembert/udoh for gasol would be go time for me.

i just would make certain that we had a 2nd deal for a random sg in place before we pulled the trigger. ellis impact wouldnt be difficult to replace but the idea that hes somehow a net negative is dumb. we wouldnt be better with simple subtraction. we'd need a random veteran sg..... think delfino/ bellineli level..... available to replace him. then wed use that guy along with dunleavy at that spot, and give mam and harris more minutes at the 3.

henson, ersan, sanders, and gasol would be a premier frontcourt in the league. we wouldnt need much to compliment them and not see a marked improvement.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 67,259
And1: 2,203
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#384 » by LUKE23 » Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:11 pm

I don't even think I'd include Udoh. Ellis/Dalembert, take it or leave it. I think most Laker fans were up for that deal actually.

And I'd only do the above deal if we were mandated to make a win now move, much rather get a lottery pick or young prospect if we can for Monta.
User avatar
GHOSTofSIKMA
RealGM
Posts: 11,334
And1: 766
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: NC
     

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#385 » by GHOSTofSIKMA » Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:23 pm

LUKE23 wrote:I don't even think I'd include Udoh. Ellis/Dalembert, take it or leave it. I think most Laker fans were up for that deal actually.

And I'd only do the above deal if we were mandated to make a win now move, much rather get a lottery pick or young prospect if we can for Monta.


perfect....

then flip udoh/ daniels for redick
or
udoh/ daniels/ #1 for affalo
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 67,259
And1: 2,203
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#386 » by LUKE23 » Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:24 pm

I don't think that gets it done for Redick, but I'd do that.
User avatar
GHOSTofSIKMA
RealGM
Posts: 11,334
And1: 766
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: NC
     

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#387 » by GHOSTofSIKMA » Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:28 pm

LUKE23 wrote:I don't think that gets it done for Redick, but I'd do that.


add the pick.... chase affalo or redick with the pick. that pick in this draft is worth giving up if we go get gasol. either one of those gaurds would make us nasty.

jennings/ udrih
redick/ dunleavy
mam/ dunleavy
sanders/ ersan
gasol/ henson

that lineup makes alot of noise in the playoffs
User avatar
ampd
RealGM
Posts: 15,202
And1: 1,544
Joined: Dec 06, 2010

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#388 » by ampd » Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:43 pm

Jennings / Afflalo / Mam / Sanders / Pau would at least finally be an extremely solid win now roster.
Lippo
Starter
Posts: 2,136
And1: 101
Joined: Jun 15, 2006

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#389 » by Lippo » Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:44 pm

I know I'm in the huge minority
but id rather do

Milwaukee - Toronto
Ellis for Derozan/Kleiza

Milwaukee - New York
Gooden/Kleiza/Ersan/2nd for Stoudemire/Shumpert

Jennings/Udrih
Shumpert/Dunleavy/Lamb
Derozan/Moute/Harris
Stoudemire/Henson/Udoh
Sanders/Dale/Pryz
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 67,259
And1: 2,203
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#390 » by LUKE23 » Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:45 pm

Lippo wrote:I know I'm in the huge minority
but id rather do

Milwaukee - Toronto
Ellis for Derozan/Kleiza

Milwaukee - New York
Gooden/Kleiza/Ersan/2nd for Stoudemire/Shumpert


Thank God you are not running this team.
BucksRUS
Analyst
Posts: 3,164
And1: 12
Joined: Jun 16, 2009
Location: In the Snow.

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#391 » by BucksRUS » Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:16 pm

Wouldn't take on Amare's uninsured contract for anything.
Trade S. Jackson soon. NJ seems like a nice place for him.
User avatar
CanadaBucks
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,384
And1: 312
Joined: Sep 14, 2012

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#392 » by CanadaBucks » Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:16 pm

LUKE23 wrote:
Lippo wrote:I know I'm in the huge minority
but id rather do

Milwaukee - Toronto
Ellis for Derozan/Kleiza

Milwaukee - New York
Gooden/Kleiza/Ersan/2nd for Stoudemire/Shumpert


Thank God you are not running this team.

LUKE23 wrote:
Lippo wrote:I know I'm in the huge minority
but id rather do

Milwaukee - Toronto
Ellis for Derozan/Kleiza

Milwaukee - New York
Gooden/Kleiza/Ersan/2nd for Stoudemire/Shumpert


Thank God you are not running this team.


You don't think it would be a good idea to pay Amare 20m for each of the next two years? Stun
Lippo
Starter
Posts: 2,136
And1: 101
Joined: Jun 15, 2006

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#393 » by Lippo » Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:33 pm

gooden/ersan/kleiza for 18m or amare 20 .. seems a wash, we don't need depth... kleiza and gooden should never play so its beasically Ersan vs Amare at the PF, and hes off the books about the time we need to pay Larry and Henson

and getting shumpert is the goal.
User avatar
coolhandluke121
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,023
And1: 259
Joined: Sep 23, 2007

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#394 » by coolhandluke121 » Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:34 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:
TyCobb wrote:It still wouldn't get it done. The Lakers aren't forced to trade Gasol, and if they do move him, it won't be to take on other teams' bad contracts. Gasol only has a year on his contract after this season.


That's true but if they want to salvage this season and next year, they need to do something drastic, which is likely to occur given Kobe's age.


Trade Kobe.
When you're spinning your wheels in mud, sometimes you have to put the car in reverse. If you refuse to do so on principle, you're an idiot.
Lippo
Starter
Posts: 2,136
And1: 101
Joined: Jun 15, 2006

Re: Trades for the Bucks to blow it up 

Post#395 » by Lippo » Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:35 pm

coolhandluke121 wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:
TyCobb wrote:It still wouldn't get it done. The Lakers aren't forced to trade Gasol, and if they do move him, it won't be to take on other teams' bad contracts. Gasol only has a year on his contract after this season.


That's true but if they want to salvage this season and next year, they need to do something drastic, which is likely to occur given Kobe's age.


Trade Kobe.



Yeah .. they should, but they won't. He'll retire a Laker.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks