JBucks wrote:A grossly overrated player who looks good on the Bucks because they have the least amount of talent in the league. Also, bound to be paid by newly minted John Hammond with a $60 million contract.
This really isn't true. If you want to include the backcourt in the above, I won't argue. But Sanders being near the lead league in blocks and defensive rating has little to do with how bad the Bucks are.
There seems to be a mentality from some that says, Bucks = bad, therefore, every Bucks player = bad. Not how it works.
Before: 30-23, 104.4 O, 102.2 D, 93.9 Pace, 1.42 SRS, .547 TS, .154 TOV
Now: 41-40, 102.7 O, 102.1 D, 94.1 Pace, -.03 SRS, .536 TS, .155 TOV
MCW Per 36 w/MIL: 16.9 PTS, 4.6 REB, 6.6 AST, 2.4 STL, 3.8 TO, .499 TS, .259 USG, .184 TOV