yardbarker

NCAA Wiretap Headlines

Bucks named "potential suitor" for Millsap

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

Post#76 Re: Bucks named "potential suitor"
Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:36 pm by ampd

DrugBust wrote:I think you guys are dreaming if you think Millsap won't get the max amount of years allowed and a minimum of $10 million annually.


We'd almost definitely have to overpay to have a chance at keeping him. 4/50 would probably be our price if its 4/40 for everyone else
ampd
RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 11,448
And1: 482
Joined: Dec 6, 2010
Top

Post#77 Re: Bucks named "potential suitor"
Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:48 pm by ackypoo

DrugBust wrote:I think you guys are dreaming if you think Millsap won't get the max amount of years allowed and a minimum of $10 million annually.

agreed
"If I grew up on a farm, and was retahhhded, Bruges might impress me but I didn't, so it doesn't."
ackypoo

Senior
User avatar
Posts: 638
And1: 127
Joined: Jan 3, 2013
Top

Post#78 Re: Bucks named "potential suitor"
Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:49 pm by H2tObes

We have a lot of cap room, but we'd really need to move Ellis, Ersan, and some other junk. Not to mention Henson could be a better player in a few years, making him an extremely expensive backup.
Kerb Hohl wrote:I don't even want to imagine the promotions and job titles we'd see if the inner-circle got this team to mid-40s wins again.

Super Director of Vice Presidency of Win Now Operations.


http://www.saveourbucks.com
H2tObes

Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 2,880
And1: 344
Joined: Oct 18, 2012
Location: In Drew Goodens goatee
Top

Post#79 Re: Bucks named "potential suitor"
Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:28 am by BucksFanSD

H2tObes wrote:We have a lot of cap room, but we'd really need to move Ellis, Ersan, and some other junk. Not to mention Henson could be a better player in a few years, making him an extremely expensive backup.


As it is now, Ersan will be Henson's expensive backup in a few years. Changng Millsap for Ersan is costing you probably only an extra million per year. I don't see why all the fuss.

Also, I am not so sure I see Larry and Henson averaging a combined 25+ ppg 2 or 3 years from now, if ever. You typically want 30 ppg from your front court starters. Else, it's the typical back court high-power offense style Bucks that annoys us all by making us live and die by the long jump shot against any given team. I am tired of living through that for most of the past decade.
BucksFanSD
Junior
Posts: 320
And1: 17
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: San Diego
Top

Post#80 Re: Bucks named "potential suitor"
Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:30 am by JayMKE

Ersan's contract is completely guarantee iirc?
FREE GIANNIS
JayMKE



RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 11,816
And1: 1,084
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: AZ
Top

Post#81 Re: Bucks named "potential suitor"
Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:50 am by mlloyd10

JayMKE wrote:Ersan's contract is completely guarantee iirc?


5th year isn't
KOHL MUST GO
mlloyd10



Assistant Coach
User avatar
Posts: 4,040
And1: 165
Joined: Jan 18, 2012
Top

Post#82 Re: Bucks named "potential suitor"
Tue Jan 22, 2013 8:25 am by WRau1

I'd take Millsap over Ersan all day. This team could use Millsap's ability to score around the basket more than Ersan's inconsistent shooting.
Image
WRau1



Lead Assistant
User avatar
Posts: 5,189
And1: 277
Joined: Apr 30, 2005
Location: Milwaukee
Top

Post#83 Re: Bucks named "potential suitor"
Tue Jan 22, 2013 8:34 am by -Kees-

I think I would deal any reasonable combo of Jennings or Ellis and Ersan, Udoh, Gooden, depending on whats exactly going out/in. Honestly, I would part with anyone outside of Henson/Sanders, as long as the roster was positionally balanced afterword. I think Milsap is a guy we should target, and should look to keep, even at 11-12M per. He can literally do everything you want on the offensive end from a PF, is a solid, but not great rebounder, and same on defense. He's just good at everything, I feel like we need more complete players around here, and Milsap's only 27 (about to be 28). I'd be ok giving him a 4 year, 44M, for example, because I think he'll keep this production for 2-3 years after this, then we'd likely have Henson taking over the starting spot and Milsap as an EXP.
-Kees-


Lead Assistant
User avatar
Posts: 5,128
And1: 39
Joined: Jan 16, 2011
Top

Post#84 Re: Bucks named "potential suitor"
Tue Jan 22, 2013 3:54 pm by verbalhologram

Milsap is a beast,would love this.
verbalhologram
Senior
User avatar
Posts: 573
And1: 3
Joined: Dec 11, 2009
Location: Sydney , Australia
Top

Post#85 Re: Bucks named "potential suitor"
Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:09 pm by emunney

Millsap is awesome. I worry about how long he'll be awesome. That'd be my only reservation. He is STILL one of the most undervalued players in the league and would instantly be our best player by far. We should have ponied up for him years ago.
NY Daily News wrote:Eddy Curry claims he slept for only two hours Sunday night because he couldn't stop thinking about ghosts.
emunney
RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 30,429
And1: 1,953
Joined: Feb 21, 2005
Location: Trusting in Thannies
Top

Post#86 Re: Bucks named "potential suitor"
Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:14 pm by H2tObes

BucksFanSD wrote:
H2tObes wrote:We have a lot of cap room, but we'd really need to move Ellis, Ersan, and some other junk. Not to mention Henson could be a better player in a few years, making him an extremely expensive backup.


As it is now, Ersan will be Henson's expensive backup in a few years. Changng Millsap for Ersan is costing you probably only an extra million per year. I don't see why all the fuss.

Also, I am not so sure I see Larry and Henson averaging a combined 25+ ppg 2 or 3 years from now, if ever. You typically want 30 ppg from your front court starters. Else, it's the typical back court high-power offense style Bucks that annoys us all by making us live and die by the long jump shot against any given team. I am tired of living through that for most of the past decade.

It will be more then one million, Millsap could easily get 11 million a year.

Also, you really don't think that in 3 years that frontcourt won't combine for 25 ppg?

Larry will get his 10 ppg, maybe he will improve on the offensive end and average 12-13.

I seriously think it's near a lock that Henson will average at least 15 ppg in 3 years. He has an extremely solid post game for a rookie, and has a good knack at getting to the rim, not to mention his incredible length.

Either way they will be good enough on the defensive end to more then make up for any possible scoring problems.
Kerb Hohl wrote:I don't even want to imagine the promotions and job titles we'd see if the inner-circle got this team to mid-40s wins again.

Super Director of Vice Presidency of Win Now Operations.


http://www.saveourbucks.com
H2tObes

Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 2,880
And1: 344
Joined: Oct 18, 2012
Location: In Drew Goodens goatee
Top

Post#87 Re: Bucks named "potential suitor"
Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:50 pm by Nebula1

emunney wrote:Millsap is awesome. I worry about how long he'll be awesome. That'd be my only reservation. He is STILL one of the most undervalued players in the league and would instantly be our best player by far. We should have ponied up for him years ago.


Agree on all points, however he'll likely remain a fairly valuable asset on his next contract so the Bucks can trade him once Henson is truly ready to step into that starting role. I'd still want to see Burks in the deal.
Terrence Jones
Nebula1
RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 22,222
And1: 350
Joined: Aug 6, 2005
Location: Underground King
Top

Post#88 Re: Bucks named "potential suitor"
Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:57 pm by giraldo5

Jennings/Ersan for Millsap/Burks would be just phenomenal. Would rather trade Ellis but doubt Utah is interested in him.
Postby LUKE23 on Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:44 pm

In shape 18-22 year olds running out of gas? Hilarious.
giraldo5
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,453
And1: 71
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Milwaukee Bucks


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: _Choco_, breakchains, DocHoliday