yardbarker

PG: Brandon > Holiday

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

ImageImage

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby AussieBuck on Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:15 am

Duncan/Splitter play some minutes together but they only combine for 51 minutes a game. It just doesn't tend to happen successfully. Memphis works because ZBo works the baseline out to 18 feet and M Gasol works the high post generally out to similar depth. Gasol's offense would suffer like Boozer's when he had to go from good spacing to hanging with Noah.
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
 
Posts: 17119
And1: 40
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Drew ****ing Gooden

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby Baddy Chuck on Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:23 am

AussieBuck wrote:Duncan/Splitter play some minutes together but they only combine for 51 minutes a game. It just doesn't tend to happen successfully. Memphis works because ZBo works the baseline out to 18 feet and M Gasol works the high post generally out to similar depth. Gasol's offense would suffer like Boozer's when he had to go from good spacing to hanging with Noah.

And I'd say Boozer suffers because he's no longer in the best pick and roll tandem in the league and he was always more reliant on his midrange game then his post game unlike Gasol.
Image
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
 
Posts: 20435
And1: 46
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Location: Monta Ellis have it all.

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby AussieBuck on Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:38 am

A post game is going to more affected by lack of spacing than a midrange game. I have no idea why this is even an argument. We've already seen Gasol's efficiency drop from having to play next to a C and here he'd have to work with a lot more defensive attention.
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
 
Posts: 17119
And1: 40
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Drew ****ing Gooden

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby Baddy Chuck on Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:44 am

AussieBuck wrote:A post game is going to more affected by lack of spacing than a midrange game. I have no idea why this is even an argument. We've already seen Gasol's efficiency drop from having to play next to a C and here he'd have to work with a lot more defensive attention.

We aren't arguing that it isn't harder to score in the paint with less spacing, I'm arguing that despite the spacing issues Gasol has proved he can score in the post. I'd say his efficiency dropped more due to him being pushed out of the lane then clogging the lane. He's still a very above average scorer in the post at 65+% (while being assisted less on those baskets) the past two seasons with Bynum and Dwight's cover in the lane and unlike those players, Larry doesn't need or deserve designed touches for him in the post.
Image
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
 
Posts: 20435
And1: 46
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
Location: Monta Ellis have it all.

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby AussieBuck on Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:40 am

He's at 31FG% in post ups.
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
 
Posts: 17119
And1: 40
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Drew ****ing Gooden

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby paul on Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:50 am

I'm not dealing Ersan for Pau - or much for that matter.

Gooden and Monta have to be in it for me to consider it and then whatever works with Udoh, Fat Sammy and Daniels. I'd put in our first this year before I'd put in Tobes or Henson both of whom I like above where they were picked.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
 
Posts: 27653
And1: 36
Joined: Dec 11, 2007

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby Sigra on Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:00 am

DH34Phan wrote:When's the last time we've been over .500 at the halfway point?


Milwaukee Bucks record after first 40 games:

2012-13 -------- 22-18
2011-12 -------- 16-24
2010-11 -------- 16-24
2009-10 -------- 17-23
2008-09 -------- 19-21
2007-08 -------- 16-24
2006-07 -------- 17-23
2005-06 -------- 21-19
2004-05 -------- 15-25
2003-04 -------- 22-18 (TJ Ford's rookie year, the last time we had all star member)
2002-03 -------- 19-21
2001-02 -------- 26-14
2000-01 -------- 25-15
1999-00 -------- 22-18
1998-99 -------- 22-18
1997-98 -------- 18-22
1996-97 -------- 19-21
1995-96 -------- 15-25
1994-95 -------- 16-24
1993-94 -------- 12-28
1992-93 -------- 17-23
1991-92 -------- 19-21
User avatar
Sigra
RealGM
 
Posts: 13806
And1: 3
Joined: Sep 8, 2005
Location: Sarajevo, Bosnia

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby Sigra on Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:07 am

paulpressey25 wrote:Nice game by everyone.

Tease continues.....

We were 6-2. Then 16-12. Now 22-18.

Can we start breaking away and separating like the teams on the rise do? We've got three winnable games in a row to run to 25-18. I'm waiting to emotionally commit.


22-18 tease happened only 6 times in last 22 years. You can emotionally commit. You have my guarantee.

Milwaukee Bucks record after first 40 games:

2012-13 -------- 22-18
2011-12 -------- 16-24
2010-11 -------- 16-24
2009-10 -------- 17-23
2008-09 -------- 19-21
2007-08 -------- 16-24
2006-07 -------- 17-23
2005-06 -------- 21-19
2004-05 -------- 15-25
2003-04 -------- 22-18 (TJ Ford's rookie year, the last time we had all star member)
2002-03 -------- 19-21
2001-02 -------- 26-14
2000-01 -------- 25-15
1999-00 -------- 22-18
1998-99 -------- 22-18

1997-98 -------- 18-22
1996-97 -------- 19-21
1995-96 -------- 15-25
1994-95 -------- 16-24
1993-94 -------- 12-28
1992-93 -------- 17-23
1991-92 -------- 19-21
User avatar
Sigra
RealGM
 
Posts: 13806
And1: 3
Joined: Sep 8, 2005
Location: Sarajevo, Bosnia

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby Sigra on Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:24 am

AussieBuck wrote:I can't believe there's so much talk of trading Ersan for Pau. I can't think of many more stupid things. If you are trading for Pau it's to play him predominately at C and giving him the space to operate as the offensive hub. Any combinatin you play with him without Ersan leaves him in the same position he was in at LA. If you are trading for Pau it's to play him for the most part beside Ersan.


Gasol and Bynum frontcourt worked just fine.

Gasol is way better than Ersan at basketball. And it make sense regarding Henson situation.

I am in.
User avatar
Sigra
RealGM
 
Posts: 13806
And1: 3
Joined: Sep 8, 2005
Location: Sarajevo, Bosnia

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby 4xBuck on Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:43 am

Holliday with 12 assists & a -12PD.

Too funny…
4xBuck
Senior
 
Posts: 662
And1: 2
Joined: Sep 7, 2009

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby GHOSTofSIKMA on Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:20 am

AussieBuck wrote:A post game is going to more affected by lack of spacing than a midrange game. I have no idea why this is even an argument. We've already seen Gasol's efficiency drop from having to play next to a C and here he'd have to work with a lot more defensive attention.


you act like you can only space the floor with a pf.

gasol is the center.... sanders, mam, or henson is the pf with him.

if henson can become a post threat playing alongside udoh, which he has been.....then of course gasol can be one besides sanders. you act as if hed be a rookie figuring out how to score or pass in the post with a double team :roll:

your argument is contrived because your ersan fan. a pf who can spread the floor is nice, but id much rather have a elite post threat like gasol.
User avatar
GHOSTofSIKMA
General Manager
 
Posts: 7766
And1: 13
Joined: Jan 20, 2007

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby WRau1 on Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:25 am

Too bad we can't pair Gasol and Ersan together in our front court. I'd love to roll out Jennings/Dunleavy/Moute/Ersan/Gasol
Image
User avatar
WRau1
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4167
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 30, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby N8Frog on Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:32 am

I know this has spiraled into another Gasol trade thread, but my thoughts on the game...

I would concur that this was probably one of Ellis' best game in Milwaukee. I think if he played this way majority of nights many of us wouldn't want him gone at all costs.

Jennings looked good again and coincidence or not, but seems more engaged since Skiles left. Ersan the same, who had another big game.

I wish Moute would clean up his game on offense a little bit. Another game with bad FG% and also went 1 for 4 from the line.

Henson is almost an untouchable for me right now, unless you are getting a stud in return. I really like Henson's upside once he adds a little weight and experience.

As for this Gasol talk, I don't really want him. I think his better days are gone and seems like an old Brewers move to get a "name" guy past their prime. I mean look at the red flags, he's 32, his #'s have dropped the last 2 years, he is starting to break down a bit, and he's been in sunny LA since 2007 --- I can't see him fired up to come here. I think everybody that wants him would be disappointed in the end. I'd rather have Millsap.
Image
User avatar
N8Frog
General Manager
 
Posts: 8512
And1: 19
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: Metropolis of Green Bay

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby JayMKE on Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:32 am

GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:A post game is going to more affected by lack of spacing than a midrange game. I have no idea why this is even an argument. We've already seen Gasol's efficiency drop from having to play next to a C and here he'd have to work with a lot more defensive attention.


you act like you can only space the floor with a pf.

gasol is the center.... sanders, mam, or henson is the pf with him.

if henson can become a post threat playing alongside udoh, which he has been.....then of course gasol can be one besides sanders. you act as if hed be a rookie figuring out how to score or pass in the post with a double team :roll:

your argument is contrived because your ersan fan. a pf who can spread the floor is nice, but id much rather have a elite post threat like gasol.


Gasol is not an elite post threat.
User avatar
JayMKE
General Manager
 
Posts: 8545
And1: 18
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: AZ

Re: PG: Brandon > Holiday

Postby LUKE23 on Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:44 am

Through 40 (22-18):

O: 25th (102.5)
D: 6th (103.3)
Pace: 5th (94.1)
Expected W-L: T-16th (.470, 38.5 wins over full season)
Actual W-L: 13th (.550, 45.1 wins over full season)
RPI: 14th (.507)
SOS: 21st (.493)
SRS: 16th (-1.13)
PPG Differential: 16th (-.70)
Hollinger Power Rank: 20th (98.595)
Hollinger Playoff Odds: 6th seed in East, 42-40, 81.8% chance of playoffs

Jennings up to .515 TS, Ilyasova up to .514 TS.
Jim Paschke ‏@Paschketball 6 Apr
I just wish everyone could enjoy the ride. I see both sides believe me. Seed and situation never concern me. It's in or out. That's all


#8 seed first round series W-L since 1983-84: 4-54
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
 
Posts: 59468
And1: 46
Joined: May 25, 2005
Location: Stunville

PreviousNext

Return to Milwaukee Bucks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baddy Chuck, benultimate, Faede, Marcus50, Turd Ferguson