Page 165 of 165

Re: The Josh Smith eventually to the Bucks thread (maybe)

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:53 pm
by Turk Nowitzki
Josh Smith and Larry Sanders would probably be one of, if not the best PF/C combo in the league defensively. I can't help but get a little excited thinking about that, offensive efficiency problems aside.

Re: The Josh Smith eventually to the Bucks thread (maybe)

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:58 pm
by H2tObes
Turk Nowitzki wrote:Josh Smith and Larry Sanders would probably be one of, if not the best PF/C combo in the league defensively. I can't help but get a little excited thinking about that, offensive efficiency problems aside.

I can't think of one that comes close

Re: The Josh Smith eventually to the Bucks thread (maybe)

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:49 pm
by braindazer
If we can ditch ellis and jennings and keep jj and get a efficient point gaurd , I could live with larry and smith . :D

Re: The Josh Smith eventually to the Bucks thread (maybe)

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:54 pm
by EastSideBucksFan
If Josh Smith WANTS to come here and we'll pay him.....I have no problem paying him and Jennings.

He could be the Bucks Reggie White FA that changes some perception....who knows how it will play out.

Re: The Josh Smith eventually to the Bucks thread (maybe)

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:57 pm
by Wiscfan92
I'm down for the move, like everyone else for the right price. He is a top 10 player no doubt at his position. Add a couple fillers and this team would get more people in the seats and I think be more competitive than our teams in recent years. I think we could be a top 4 team in the east with him on the team

Re: The Josh Smith eventually to the Bucks thread (maybe)

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:18 pm
by jtrinaldi
I would rather pay Josh the max, than pay Redick/Jennings/Monta 20 million per year for 2 of the 3 of them.

Re: The Josh Smith eventually to the Bucks thread (maybe)

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:40 pm
by coolhandluke121
jtrinaldi wrote:I would rather pay Josh the max, than pay Redick/Jennings/Monta 20 million per year for 2 of the 3 of them.


I agree, but it's a false dilemma.