Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
emunney wrote:Per John Schuhmann on twitter, Joe Johnson is 9-10 this season with under a minute to go in the 4th or OT with the score differential 3 pts or less.
Bad Midget wrote:jr lucosa wrote:whatthe_buck!? wrote:But as I keep mentioning, we have hints dropped by very reliable sourcing that the outcomes of these games before the deadline will likely play into the probability we make a bigger trade (ie break up the swag twins). So if u understand why someone would want Monta or BJ traded, then it should make a lot of sense to u why some would want us to lose tonight and tomorrow...
Huh? What very reliable sources said that us losing these couple of Brooklyn games could lead to us blowing things up?
A poster on an internet message board said so. Must be infallible.
emunney wrote:Per John Schuhmann on twitter, Joe Johnson is 9-10 this season with under a minute to go in the 4th or OT with the score differential 3 pts or less.
emunney wrote:Per John Schuhmann on twitter, Joe Johnson is 9-10 this season with under a minute to go in the 4th or OT with the score differential 3 pts or less.
JBucks wrote:Refs were fine tonight. If anything I thought the reffing dispelled the notion that the Nets get all the calls. That offensive foul call on Williams at the end was a no-call waiting to happen and they saw threw Deron's phantom acting on defense.
paulpressey25 wrote:It was great to have that 6 day break where we could pretend our guys didn't suck so much.
DrugBust wrote:I don't believe anything at the deadline. I like discussing all the rumors and all the nuggets, but nothing ever happens the way it's leaked.
Garbs_7 wrote:whatthe_buck!? wrote:DrugBust wrote:LOL @ reliable sources at the trade deadline.
I'm actually surprised that u wouldn't agree that the person who hinted at what I'm referring to isn't 'very reliable' relative to just about anyone else... You understand the context of what I'm saying and who I'm referring to right?
Yes it was the BuckPack rumour saying the Bucks would closely moniter how we did in the few games leading up to the deadline in regards to making moves. A piece of info like that could get skewed around so much by the time it goes through the FO and all the way through to BuckPack's guy then to BuckPack then us. You can't take every little word for gospel and clearly the Front Office has been very busy in talks and already has some deals on the table, these Brooklyn games just aren't going to make us take everything off the table and sit still.
Especially if the rumoured deal is Moute / 1st for Redick, why on earth would you want to lose 2 games and then make a deal like that. Our Front Office is dumb but not dumb enough to sit idle and not try improve the team (even their definition) basis two games against the Nets.
whatthe_buck!? wrote: I think that u ridiculing me for believing certain proven sources of good bucks info are reliable is just as stupid.
JimmyTheKid wrote:5 things I hated about tonight's game:
3) Mbah a Moute and Ilyasova's defense at the of regulation. (are you fu**ing kidding me giving up a wide open three up three?)
4) Refs were bad (one-sided)
MaxtradamusBfinkish wrote:Garbs_7 wrote:whatthe_buck!? wrote:I'm actually surprised that u wouldn't agree that the person who hinted at what I'm referring to isn't 'very reliable' relative to just about anyone else... You understand the context of what I'm saying and who I'm referring to right?
Yes it was the BuckPack rumour saying the Bucks would closely moniter how we did in the few games leading up to the deadline in regards to making moves. A piece of info like that could get skewed around so much by the time it goes through the FO and all the way through to BuckPack's guy then to BuckPack then us. You can't take every little word for gospel and clearly the Front Office has been very busy in talks and already has some deals on the table, these Brooklyn games just aren't going to make us take everything off the table and sit still.
Especially if the rumoured deal is Moute / 1st for Redick, why on earth would you want to lose 2 games and then make a deal like that. Our Front Office is dumb but not dumb enough to sit idle and not try improve the team (even their definition) basis two games against the Nets.
exactly. that would really hurt then...
whatthe_buck!? wrote:Read into what was said however u like. What was said tho was that a minor deal (for someone like Redick) is more likely if we go into the deadline with wins. A bigger trade (like breaking up the swag twins) is more likely if we string losses together before the deadline. Yes some of that is me reading into what was said, but if I'm correct in my interpretAtion then u guys rooting for wins may actually be making that Redick trade u guys all hate relatively MORE likely to happen. Good luck with that.
BUCKnation wrote:Im hoping the friction between Monta and Boylan leads to something.
whatthe_buck!? wrote:Read into what was said however u like. What was said tho was that a minor deal (for someone like Redick) is more likely if we go into the deadline with wins. A bigger trade (like breaking up the swag twins) is more likely if we string losses together before the deadline. Yes some of that is me reading into what was said, but if I'm correct in my interpretAtion then u guys rooting for wins may actually be making that Redick trade u guys all hate relatively MORE likely to happen. Good luck with that.
Sherman Douglas wrote:Monta Ellis makes me appreciate Brandon Jennings.
Sherman Douglas wrote:Monta Ellis makes me appreciate Brandon Jennings.
Bfinkish wrote:Garbs_7 wrote:whatthe_buck!? wrote:
Yes it was the BuckPack rumour saying the Bucks would closely moniter how we did in the few games leading up to the deadline in regards to making moves. A piece of info like that could get skewed around so much by the time it goes through the FO and all the way through to BuckPack's guy then to BuckPack then us. You can't take every little word for gospel and clearly the Front Office has been very busy in talks and already has some deals on the table, these Brooklyn games just aren't going to make us take everything off the table and sit still.
Especially if the rumoured deal is Moute / 1st for Redick, why on earth would you want to lose 2 games and then make a deal like that. Our Front Office is dumb but not dumb enough to sit idle and not try improve the team (even their definition) basis two games against the Nets.
exactly. that would really hurt then...
Read into what was said however u like. What was said tho was that a minor deal (for someone like Redick) is more likely if we go into the deadline with wins. A bigger trade (like breaking up the swag twins) is more likely if we string losses together before the deadline. Yes some of that is me reading into what was said, but if I'm correct in my interpretAtion then u guys rooting for wins may actually be making that Redick trade u guys all hate relatively MORE likely to happen. Good luck with that.
