ImageImage

ATL: Trade deadline eve....

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

User avatar
GHOSTofSIKMA
RealGM
Posts: 10,533
And1: 548
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
Location: NC
     

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#101 » by GHOSTofSIKMA » Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:32 am

AussieBuck wrote:You guys seriously fail at basketball.


well you fail at good looks and youre mean!
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 23,429
And1: 2,477
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: saveourbucks.com
 

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#102 » by AussieBuck » Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:34 am

GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:You guys seriously fail at basketball.


well you fail at good looks and youre mean!

I look OK from the right angle with the right lighting and a good photographer.
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 23,429
And1: 2,477
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: saveourbucks.com
 

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#103 » by AussieBuck » Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:59 am

Image

Now that's a handsome man!
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
User avatar
Wise1
RealGM
Posts: 18,032
And1: 122
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Location: Devouring worlds.

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#104 » by Wise1 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:19 am

GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
Max Green wrote:Warriors beat another good team without Bogut. How long before people start to acknowledge the elephant in the room that they are a better team without him.


its just like what happened with us last year once he went out. we got better too. hes just not a good player if he is the focal point of anything on offense...... and his defense is terribly overrated as well. hes still above average defender but hes not some gamechanger there anymore like he was . his decline is just sad but it dates to the elbow injury.... all these multiple surgeries and procedures since that incident have just compounded it all. hes the mickey rourke meets joan rivers of the league at this point.


You forgot Lil Kim....

Image

Yeah..the Bogut situation speaks for itself. Just look at today's wiretap. He was a sinking asset for the Bucks. What we've already received from Monta and Udoh is better than a guy that is paid 13plus mil and doesn't play. It's impossible for the Bucks to have lost that trade.
Any GM that takes Andrew Wiggins #1 overall has got to be out of his damn mind.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 23,429
And1: 2,477
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: saveourbucks.com
 

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#105 » by AussieBuck » Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:28 am

Couldn't think of a funnier line of reasoning when talking about the guy we traded for Monta Francis.
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
User avatar
SkilesTheLimit
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,039
And1: 623
Joined: Oct 22, 2010
Location: Pop Up Zone
     

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#106 » by SkilesTheLimit » Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:47 am

Wise1 wrote:
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
Max Green wrote:Warriors beat another good team without Bogut. How long before people start to acknowledge the elephant in the room that they are a better team without him.


its just like what happened with us last year once he went out. we got better too. hes just not a good player if he is the focal point of anything on offense...... and his defense is terribly overrated as well. hes still above average defender but hes not some gamechanger there anymore like he was . his decline is just sad but it dates to the elbow injury.... all these multiple surgeries and procedures since that incident have just compounded it all. hes the mickey rourke meets joan rivers of the league at this point.


You forgot Lil Kim....

Image

Yeah..the Bogut situation speaks for itself. Just look at today's wiretap. He was a sinking asset for the Bucks. What we've already received from Monta and Udoh is better than a guy that is paid 13plus mil and doesn't play. It's impossible for the Bucks to have lost that trade.


Bogut's a **** bum. Nothing has changed with that soft, big mouth punk. Glad he's off my roster.
This is about winning basketball games. This is about winning Championships.

-Wes Edens
User avatar
coolhandluke121
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,729
And1: 187
Joined: Sep 23, 2007

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#107 » by coolhandluke121 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:15 am

I disagree with blaming Bogut, except in the sense that he doesn't always mesh with his teammates. I'm convinced now more than ever that team identity is often an important variable for success. Having one and sticking to it can make the whole greater than the sum of the parts. Not having everyone on the same page can cause problems. Look at what Anthony Mason did to the Bucks. Theoretically he was exactly what they needed, but only on paper. The 2001 Bucks and FTD Bucks had an identity. The 2006 Bucks were probably more talented top to bottom but were totally mismatched.

It's the gm's and coach's responsibility to know players well enough to create an identity. Complementing each other is a good thing to a point, but you can't go so far as to mix in a few guys who have a completely different attitude about how to play basketball. You also can't create an identity that causes more weaknesses than it solves (see last year's "transition offense, no defense" Bucks). But if you don't have a ton of talent, you gotta have one.

The reason I've always liked this year's team and still have plenty of optimism for them is that I think they have the potential to create a strong identity (speed, athleticism, blocks and steals leading to transition, help defenders, et cetera). I've always felt that they're just one good half-court guard away from clicking and becoming better than the sum of the parts, and I was confident that they had the assets to get that player at the deadline.

Unfortunately, as much as I love LRMAM I think he's the one player who doesn't really fit the identity that well. They do need his man-to-man defense, but playing him at sf is a nightmare. He is SO much better than the player we've seen this year, but it's not working out. Trading him and Udoh for Smith would have been filthy, because you would have replaced a terrible fit for an up-tempo team with a pretty good fit for an up-tempo team, but without losing anything on man-to-man combo forward defense.
When you're spinning your wheels in mud, sometimes you have to put the car in reverse. If you refuse to do so on principle, you're an idiot.
User avatar
CanadaBucks
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,298
And1: 292
Joined: Sep 14, 2012

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#108 » by CanadaBucks » Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:17 am

Well stated......I think people tend to throw the word chemistry out there too much when probably synergy is a better word. And yes, Luc cannot start at 3 for us going forward, If we had Redick and Ersan i would say an athletic slashing 3 with a decent mid-range game would work.
User avatar
Wise1
RealGM
Posts: 18,032
And1: 122
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Location: Devouring worlds.

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#109 » by Wise1 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:18 am

Holding out hope that the Bucks can bring in Smith this offseason. Agreed that LRMBAM is a poor fit. However, if Smith comes in, Ersan may be on the block making Luc Richard a valuable backup at the 4 until Henson finds his game.
Any GM that takes Andrew Wiggins #1 overall has got to be out of his damn mind.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 43,695
And1: 2,515
Joined: Oct 26, 2002
     

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#110 » by paulpressey25 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:20 am

Wise1 wrote:Holding out hope that the Bucks can bring in Smith this offseason. Agreed that LRMBAM is a poor fit. However, if Smith comes in, Ersan may be on the block making Luc Richard a valuable backup at the 4 until Henson finds his game.


Unfortunately I think we have to way overpay Smith to get him, which may involve a sign and trade with Atlanta. Ersan likely goes south in that scenario I'd bet.
I don't tweet much, but when I do, it is the same garbage you get from me on here:

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
Wise1
RealGM
Posts: 18,032
And1: 122
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Location: Devouring worlds.

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#111 » by Wise1 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:27 am

I'd be okay with acquiring Smith at the expense of Ersan. JJ gives us the stretch ability that Ersan gives us, albeit at a different position. Unfortunately, I don't think Atlanta wants to see Smith in Milwaukee and will burn the midnight oil to send him to the western conference.

IF a viable sign and trade is on the table with Milwaukee, then yes I think we will be forced to overpay. I'd hate to do it, but I want to win so I go ahead and bite the bullet. Chances are, we won't draft a player as good as Smith anytime soon anyway. If by some chance we do, that player will be on a cheap rookie deal for the bulk of Smith's contract.
Any GM that takes Andrew Wiggins #1 overall has got to be out of his damn mind.
User avatar
JimmyTheKid
Analyst
Posts: 3,717
And1: 690
Joined: Feb 10, 2009

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#112 » by JimmyTheKid » Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:44 am

CanadaBucks wrote:Well stated......I think people tend to throw the word chemistry out there too much when probably synergy is a better word. And yes, Luc cannot start at 3 for us going forward, If we had Redick and Ersan i would say an athletic slashing 3 with a decent mid-range game would work.


Josh Smith?

:D
User avatar
JimmyTheKid
Analyst
Posts: 3,717
And1: 690
Joined: Feb 10, 2009

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#113 » by JimmyTheKid » Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:47 am

Max Green wrote:Warriors beat another good team without Bogut. How long before people start to acknowledge the elephant in the room that they are a better team without him.


Its too early to make any declaration. But it is strange that not only have the Warriors played better basketball without Bogut in the lineup, but better defense as well. I'm just glad the Bucks don't have to deal with his injury-prone-ness. Ankle, back spasms, etc. Has he had a migraine yet?
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 43,695
And1: 2,515
Joined: Oct 26, 2002
     

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#114 » by paulpressey25 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 12:01 pm

Wise1 wrote: Chances are, we won't draft a player as good as Smith anytime soon anyway.


That is why I'm still depressed that some form of trade didn't go through for Smith.

When the talk first started a week ago, I was in the camp of "pass'. But as the week went on and I kept thinking about it, I came to the conclusion we weren't going to be in position to get a guy of his caliber anytime soon and that he'd fit perfectly alongside Larry.

My depression goes hand in hand with the guards. If we weren't going to add Smith, then I would rather we do everything in our power to move out those guards and try to get at least one of the young guards like Bledsoe or Lamb if we could.

But we are now stuck. No Smith and locked into keeping at least one of not both of Brandon and Monta next season.
I don't tweet much, but when I do, it is the same garbage you get from me on here:

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
CanadaBucks
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,298
And1: 292
Joined: Sep 14, 2012

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#115 » by CanadaBucks » Sat Feb 23, 2013 12:07 pm

JimmyTheKid wrote:
Max Green wrote:Warriors beat another good team without Bogut. How long before people start to acknowledge the elephant in the room that they are a better team without him.


Its too early to make any declaration. But it is strange that not only have the Warriors p

layed better basketball without Bogut in the lineup, but better defense as well. I'm just glad the Bucks don't have to deal with his injury-prone-ness. Ankle, back spasms, etc. Has he had a migraine yet?



Yup, there's a few others that would fit, Gerald Wallace a few years ago, think even a guy like Landry Fields might work.....
jokeboy86
Starter
Posts: 2,331
And1: 151
Joined: May 08, 2007

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#116 » by jokeboy86 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 12:53 pm

I'm starting to pay close attention to Toronto. They're 7-3 since they got Gay and their next two games against Cle & Was are very winnable. They're quietly making a charge for that 8th seed. That March 2nd game just got very interesting.
User avatar
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 11,328
And1: 274
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: Wisconsin
       

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#117 » by Thunder Muscle » Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:36 pm

Philly may be getting Bynum back soon too. Lottery is definitely not out of the question. Curious if Boston cools off though.

Bogut, man just can't stay on the court. Glad we moved on, not that we've been a ton better but at least that false hope of him returning to save the day is gone.
TBD
DocHoliday
RealGM
Posts: 13,258
And1: 1,544
Joined: Jun 29, 2007

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#118 » by DocHoliday » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:52 pm

Earl K. Sneed ‏@EKS_MavsNBA

Hahahaha Dirk's mouth just dropped when Anthony Morrow hit 24 of 25 from behind the 3-point line.
User avatar
Max Green
RealGM
Posts: 11,401
And1: 1,108
Joined: Jul 03, 2007
Location: Optimist Ave.
 

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#119 » by Max Green » Sat Feb 23, 2013 7:35 pm

JimmyTheKid wrote:
Max Green wrote:Warriors beat another good team without Bogut. How long before people start to acknowledge the elephant in the room that they are a better team without him.


Its too early to make any declaration. But it is strange that not only have the Warriors played better basketball without Bogut in the lineup, but better defense as well. I'm just glad the Bucks don't have to deal with his injury-prone-ness. Ankle, back spasms, etc. Has he had a migraine yet?


It may be too early but then again the season is close to being 70% done. They still have a chance to figure it out and maximize the skill set he brings to the table if he can actually stay healthy and string together some consecutive games without getting hurt. If they use him to his full potential on both ends of the floor then he should make them a better team, But right now they are a better without him playing, the numbers, record and eye test all say that.
Vice President of Parker-Nation.
#OwnTheTank
Touchpass
Senior
Posts: 657
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 16, 2011
Location: Blow it up.

Re: ATL: Trade deadline eve.... 

Post#120 » by Touchpass » Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:40 pm

Tobias, Beno, and Doron all on the floor together to finish the 1st.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks


Users browsing this forum: bigdog34, Down To Buck, imithanos, jakecronus8, Zeezprah