yardbarker

Would Smith add chemistry?

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

ImageImage

Would Smith add chemistry?

Postby GoldenAntlers on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:03 pm

Hey Bucks fans,

I just learned about this site recently and have been reading many of your posts for the last couple of weeks. It seems like this is the only place where serious talk of the Bucks is going on, so first, I thank you all for that as I have learned much.

I have a varying degree of interest in Jennings/Ellis. As a fan, watching their dynamism is both exciting and frustrating. I know many of the members here would love to see either one or both of these players leave and I understand why, but I wonder, would Josh Smith in the starting line-up make them better team players or better players overall?

It is all heresy until tomorrow, but if the Bucks are looking to keep Ellis, Jennings, Sanders, (Henson), that means someone has to go, highly likely that someone (someones) would be Ilyasova and Dalembert. Honestly, I think both of these guys can go. Dalembert doesn't have much time left in the NBA and Ilyasova is too inconsistent for my taste (i know, you could flame me about jennings/ellis for the same comment. I do like how many charges he takes. :) )

Of course the major argument boils down to money and contracts ending this year.

As the above suggests, the starting line-up would be:

Jennings
Ellis
LRMBM
Smith
Sanders

We'd still have Henson, Dunleavy, Udrih and Udoh coming off the bench. Not to mention Harris (who is worth holding on to.)

If this team were able to find chemistry I think they could make it into the 2nd round of playoffs, and with that momentum, who knows.

I guess to play Devil's advocate, I'm wondering if maybe Milwaukee's problem wasn't too much swag, but not enough? If you are going to swag, go all out, or you are left with a team that has an identity issue.
If this move passes, I have a feeling many of you will be surprised by the outcome of this team once playoffs hit. Then again, this deal could easily be the worst move the Bucks have made in years.

Trying to see the light. :)

Can anybody tell me the pros/cons of Josh Smith, (as well as why he would or wouldn't enhance team chemistry) as I haven't actually seen the Hawks play in a couple of years?

Long post, but thanks for your thoughts.

Go Bucks!
GoldenAntlers
Sophomore
 
Posts: 105
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Would Smith add chemistry?

Postby Fed on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:05 pm

Maybe, maybe not. I think Smith would excel in the pick and roll.
Image
Fed
Sophomore
 
Posts: 236
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 17, 2010

Re: Would Smith add chemistry?

Postby sneakerdust on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:05 pm

Image
sneakerdust
Junior
 
Posts: 460
And1: 3
Joined: Oct 4, 2012

Re: Would Smith add chemistry?

Postby RandyBreuer on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:05 pm

didn't know the Bucks were at risk of repeat offending anything?..........other than $MUCHO SWAG$


no Smith would not add chemistry....but he would add $MUCHO SWAG$

IBTL???
by xTitan on Wed Jun 27, 2012 10:55 p
Why would the Kings want Ellis? Perhaps you are just assuming they are dumb?

by DrugBust on Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:53 am
Sorry if my opinion offended your delicate sensibilities.
RandyBreuer
Senior
 
Posts: 506
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 25, 2012

Re: Would Smith add chemistry?

Postby A Diddy2231 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:06 pm

Real question is will this thread get locked or not?
Go ahead, make your jokes, Mr. Jokey... Joke-maker. But let me hit you with some knowledge. Quit now. Save yourself the embarrassment of losing with these losers in the playoffs, Herb Kohl.
User avatar
A Diddy2231
Analyst
 
Posts: 3127
And1: 6
Joined: Sep 28, 2007
Location: OAK C

Re: Would Smith add chemistry?

Postby humanrefutation on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:07 pm

It'll get locked. IBTL!
User avatar
humanrefutation
General Manager
 
Posts: 8952
And1: 9
Joined: Jun 4, 2006

Re: Would Smith add chemistry?

Postby paulpressey25 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:08 pm

Welcome to the board!

Please jump into our existing Josh Smith trade thread.

thx
When Krause said he didn’t feel that the season could be called a good one since we fell short of the playoffs, Paschke rightly reminded him that there are 14 upstanding teams that didn’t make the playoffs. Made me proud that we could be among them.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 37270
And1: 44
Joined: Oct 26, 2002
Location: "John Hammond, my word is stronger than oak!" -Danny Ferry

Re: Would Smith add chemistry?

Postby JimmyTheKid on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:08 pm

Cue 500 different variations of this post:

"Smith would add SWAG!!!!"

followed by chuckles, giggles, and eventually guffaws...
User avatar
JimmyTheKid
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1834
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 10, 2009


Return to Milwaukee Bucks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: eagle13, jr lucosa, RickInCali, smauss, theFireBlanket