yardbarker

Milwaukee Bucks Season Stats

Player GP MPG FGM FGA FG% 3PM 3PA 3P% FTM FTA FT% RPG APG SPG BPG PPG
Brandon Knight7233.36.4015.17.4221.534.69.3253.604.49.8023.544.890.960.2417.93
Ramon Sessions2832.55.0010.86.4610.712.00.3575.116.07.8413.074.790.570.1115.82
Khris Middleton8230.04.5910.41.4401.463.54.4141.441.67.8613.782.061.010.2312.07
John Henson7026.54.919.13.5380.000.01.0001.302.53.5147.101.610.591.6611.13
Giannis Antetokounmpo7724.62.255.43.4140.531.53.3471.792.62.6834.401.940.780.796.82

See all Milwaukee Bucks season stats

Would Smith add chemistry?

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

Post#1 Would Smith add chemistry?
Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:03 pm by GoldenAntlers

Hey Bucks fans,

I just learned about this site recently and have been reading many of your posts for the last couple of weeks. It seems like this is the only place where serious talk of the Bucks is going on, so first, I thank you all for that as I have learned much.

I have a varying degree of interest in Jennings/Ellis. As a fan, watching their dynamism is both exciting and frustrating. I know many of the members here would love to see either one or both of these players leave and I understand why, but I wonder, would Josh Smith in the starting line-up make them better team players or better players overall?

It is all heresy until tomorrow, but if the Bucks are looking to keep Ellis, Jennings, Sanders, (Henson), that means someone has to go, highly likely that someone (someones) would be Ilyasova and Dalembert. Honestly, I think both of these guys can go. Dalembert doesn't have much time left in the NBA and Ilyasova is too inconsistent for my taste (i know, you could flame me about jennings/ellis for the same comment. I do like how many charges he takes. :) )

Of course the major argument boils down to money and contracts ending this year.

As the above suggests, the starting line-up would be:

Jennings
Ellis
LRMBM
Smith
Sanders

We'd still have Henson, Dunleavy, Udrih and Udoh coming off the bench. Not to mention Harris (who is worth holding on to.)

If this team were able to find chemistry I think they could make it into the 2nd round of playoffs, and with that momentum, who knows.

I guess to play Devil's advocate, I'm wondering if maybe Milwaukee's problem wasn't too much swag, but not enough? If you are going to swag, go all out, or you are left with a team that has an identity issue.
If this move passes, I have a feeling many of you will be surprised by the outcome of this team once playoffs hit. Then again, this deal could easily be the worst move the Bucks have made in years.

Trying to see the light. :)

Can anybody tell me the pros/cons of Josh Smith, (as well as why he would or wouldn't enhance team chemistry) as I haven't actually seen the Hawks play in a couple of years?

Long post, but thanks for your thoughts.

Go Bucks!
Om
GoldenAntlers

Senior
User avatar
Posts: 706
And1: 76
Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Top

Post#2 Re: Would Smith add chemistry?
Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:05 pm by Fed

Maybe, maybe not. I think Smith would excel in the pick and roll.
Image
Fed
Junior
User avatar
Posts: 254
And1: 6
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
Top

Post#3 Re: Would Smith add chemistry?
Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:05 pm by sneakerdust

Image
sneakerdust
Senior
Posts: 743
And1: 53
Joined: Oct 4, 2012
Top

Post#4 Re: Would Smith add chemistry?
Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:05 pm by RandyBreuer

didn't know the Bucks were at risk of repeat offending anything?..........other than $MUCHO SWAG$


no Smith would not add chemistry....but he would add $MUCHO SWAG$

IBTL???
by Sigra on Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:51 am
I remember few years ago how people had colective ejaculations on Knight. Gang-bang style.

by DrugBust on Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:53 am
Sorry if my opinion offended your delicate sensibilities.
RandyBreuer
Rookie
Posts: 1,084
And1: 35
Joined: Jun 25, 2012
Location: Phoenix....Winning Takes Balls
Top

Post#5 Re: Would Smith add chemistry?
Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:06 pm by A Diddy2231

Real question is will this thread get locked or not?
Johnny wrote:You betrayed me! You're not good. You, you're just a chicken. Chip-chip-chip-chip-cheep-cheep.
A Diddy2231


Analyst
User avatar
Posts: 3,472
And1: 33
Joined: Sep 28, 2007
Location: NEW BEEZY
Top

Post#6 Re: Would Smith add chemistry?
Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:07 pm by humanrefutation

It'll get locked. IBTL!
humanrefutation




RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 11,113
And1: 310
Joined: Jun 4, 2006
Top

Post#7 Re: Would Smith add chemistry?
Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:08 pm by paulpressey25

Welcome to the board!

Please jump into our existing Josh Smith trade thread.

thx
paulpressey25



Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
User avatar
Posts: 41,010
And1: 905
Joined: Oct 26, 2002
Top

Post#8 Re: Would Smith add chemistry?
Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:08 pm by JimmyTheKid

Cue 500 different variations of this post:

"Smith would add SWAG!!!!"

followed by chuckles, giggles, and eventually guffaws...
JimmyTheKid
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 2,801
And1: 191
Joined: Feb 10, 2009
Top


Return to Milwaukee Bucks


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ackypoo, BigDee, buckRISING, DarvinHam, DPGBucks, hakjak, humanrefutation, jimfen21, Kerb Hohl, Laffety Daniels, marques-8, Newz, Nowak008, randy84, rayallenscalves, SeaLORD_0318, Sky Bucks, tntrost, Todd_Day, TroyD92, tski1972, Waukee Taukee, wichmae