Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

SkilesTheLimit · Post #61 » by **SkilesTheLimit** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:40 am

Sparky about to blow his lid.

LedZepp007 · Post #62 » by **LedZepp007** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:40 am

blazza18 wrote:Are were sure Ellis missed the third free throw on purpose ?

Right?! If you miss the second, you should MAKE the third. Or try.

paul · Post #63 » by **paul** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:40 am

El Pooch Grande wrote:Monta for Smoove....PLEEEEEEEEASE HAMMOND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Perfect solution, they are nothing alike

What's the definition of insanity again?

LittleRooster · Post #64 » by **LittleRooster** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:41 am

wichmae wrote:Classic ending...

?

Wooderson · Post #65 » by **Wooderson** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:41 am

JayMKE wrote:I wish we had Bogut in a suit

I thought he was better than Redick? :wink:

But seriously, said the same thing in the game thread. Pretty amazing that it took less than a year for the centerpiece in the Bogut trade to be such an obvious net negative on the court.

MikeIsGood · Post #66 » by **MikeIsGood** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:41 am

blazza18 wrote:Are were sure Ellis missed the third free throw on purpose ?

He looked like he literally wanted to die after the second FT.

ComeBackRay34 · Post #67 » by **ComeBackRay34** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:41 am

blazza18 wrote:Are were sure Ellis missed the third free throw on purpose ?

paul · Post #68 » by **paul** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:41 am

LedZepp007 wrote:
ComeBackRay34 wrote:That was one of the funniest endings to a Bucks game in recent memory. And then, I cry a little, knowing we traded Bogut for this piece of poop. Hammond could have traded for anything else, and I would have been ok with it. Why Monta.....

Bogut is done, dude. I understand the love for bogut, but his time here was done. I'm just glad Hammond got an asset for him.

Which asset? Udoh?

sneakerdust · Post #69 » by **sneakerdust** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:42 am

paul wrote:
El Pooch Grande wrote:Monta for Smoove....PLEEEEEEEEASE HAMMOND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Perfect solution, they are nothing alike

What's the definition of insanity again?

An aussie Bucks fan post Bogut 8-)

MikeIsGood · Post #70 » by **MikeIsGood** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:42 am

El Pooch Grande wrote:Monta for Smoove....PLEEEEEEEEASE HAMMOND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

...something about deck chairs and the Titanic...

wichmae · Post #71 » by **wichmae** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:43 am

LittleRooster wrote:
wichmae wrote:Classic ending...

?

Not gonna go there.

CJTURT · Post #72 » by **CJTURT** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:43 am

All I can picture in my head is the night they interviewed Ellis and he said he was as good as Wade.

Wilford Brimley · Post #73 » by **Wilford Brimley** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:44 am

LOL, Bucks live is talking about opposing players who routinely burn the Bucks.

Sherman Douglas · Post #74 » by **Sherman Douglas** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:44 am

Just **** get rid of Monta Ellis, trade him for Andrew Bogut's corpse, trade him for the rights to Brad Lohaus' contract rights should he choose to unretire at some point.

El Pooch Grande · Post #75 » by **El Pooch Grande** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:44 am

paul wrote:
LedZepp007 wrote:
ComeBackRay34 wrote:That was one of the funniest endings to a Bucks game in recent memory. And then, I cry a little, knowing we traded Bogut for this piece of poop. Hammond could have traded for anything else, and I would have been ok with it. Why Monta.....

Bogut is done, dude. I understand the love for bogut, but his time here was done. I'm just glad Hammond got an asset for him.

Which asset? Udoh?

Well....according to Danny Ferry, Ellis would be that asset

ReddWing · Post #76 » by **ReddWing** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:44 am

LUKE23 wrote:
They have no closer and no efficient offense that can create its own shot. So it really isn't surprising. They are not better than their record though. They are finally playing to their talent. It usually happens.

I agree about the closer. We are a single player away from being a threat. Monta is killing us. I'd rather have Salmons back.

GHOSTofSIKMA · Post #77 » by **GHOSTofSIKMA** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:44 am

MikeIsGood wrote:Some people were tough on those who criticized Ellis from the get-go. Some people stood up for him and said he was a legit good player.

Maybe even funnier than Ellis himself.

ellis was a good player. maybe not a winner.....that was in doubt. but he was a good player.

what he is now is....much different. those that think we have the gs version of ellis here in milwaukee are deluded. he literally went from a player to a cartton from the minute he arrived. im done waiting for the old monta to show back up. hes just like all the rest of these clowns we get that come thru here.

btw.. im officially off the smith bandwagon. he'll make a mockery of us. he needs to go somewhere else for the sake of his career with the contract hes about to sign.

ReddWing · Post #78 » by **ReddWing** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:44 am

LUKE23 wrote:
They have no closer and no efficient offense that can create its own shot. So it really isn't surprising. They are not better than their record though. They are finally playing to their talent. It usually happens.

I agree about the closer. We are a single player away from being a threat. Monta is killing us. I'd rather have Salmons back.

LedZepp007 · Post #79 » by **LedZepp007** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:44 am

paul wrote:
LedZepp007 wrote:
ComeBackRay34 wrote:That was one of the funniest endings to a Bucks game in recent memory. And then, I cry a little, knowing we traded Bogut for this piece of poop. Hammond could have traded for anything else, and I would have been ok with it. Why Monta.....

Bogut is done, dude. I understand the love for bogut, but his time here was done. I'm just glad Hammond got an asset for him.

Which asset? Udoh?

Luckily, many GMs appear to not have league pass. Hammond is one.

step3profit · Post #80 » by **step3profit** » Thu Feb 21, 2013 3:46 am