yardbarker

NCAA Wiretap Headlines

Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

Post#166 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:58 pm by JayMKE

Marshon wants in on the Swag Train
FREE GIANNIS
JayMKE



RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 11,706
And1: 1,052
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: AZ
Top

Post#167 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:01 am by Garbs_7

JayMKE wrote:Marshon wants in on the Swag Train


:lol: great
Image

www.saveourbucks.com

"Build for the future, not the 8th seed"
Garbs_7



Assistant Coach
User avatar
Posts: 3,900
And1: 260
Joined: Jan 3, 2005
Location: Perth, Australia
Top

Post#168 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:10 am by paul

JayMKE wrote:Marshon wants in on the Swag Train


:lol:

Feels like home.
paul
RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 31,039
And1: 628
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
Top

Post#169 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:12 am by Wooderson

I would love some Marsha on this squad, but only if we can acquire Bargnani too.
Wooderson



General Manager
User avatar
Posts: 7,934
And1: 876
Joined: Mar 3, 2008
Top

Post#170 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:15 am by Wooderson

GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:its been clearly discussed in the media that teams are calling on ellis. youre denying this because the only specific name thats been discussed is a borderline all star? bogut isnt good anymore. of course we can trade ellis for somebody better than bogut if were hesitant to even trade him for josh smith for crissakes.


Uh, Ellis for Smith straight up isn't happening. I will gladly come back here and give you props if it does, but there's no way ATL accepts that. If it was on the table the Bucks would have done it already. They're probably expecting one of Harris/Henson/1st in order to make it happen, and in that case Ellis would be a minor part of the deal. Ellis just isn't valuable anymore given how pathetic he's been.
Wooderson



General Manager
User avatar
Posts: 7,934
And1: 876
Joined: Mar 3, 2008
Top

Post#171 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:33 am by DanoMac

Image
DanoMac



Head Coach
User avatar
Posts: 6,911
And1: 636
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: Vomiting at midcourt of the Bradley Center
Top

Post#172 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:37 am by galena

I actually feel really bad for Monta. Despite his flaws he does seem to actually care about winning. Seems like a pretty good guy. That was just awful. When he got fouled I said aloud to myself that he would definitely miss the first free throw. He wasn't even going to tease us I knew. What a waste of talent though. On a different note, Brandon convinced me that we should keep him. He was really getting into the paint tonight. He's pretty **** good. I think he'll get about 25% better too. He's a good player.
"I guess..."
galena



Sophomore
User avatar
Posts: 228
And1: 3
Joined: Jun 4, 2008
Location: Shorewood, WI
Top

Post#173 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:42 am by EastSideBucksFan

I remember when CDR wanted to Fear the Deer as well.

Good times.


I'd trade a 2nd round pick for Marshon. Not more than that though.
EastSideBucksFan

RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 14,837
And1: 1,293
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Top

Post#174 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:48 am by step3profit

galena wrote:I actually feel really bad for Monta. Despite his flaws he does seem to actually care about winning. Seems like a pretty good guy. That was just awful. When he got fouled I said aloud to myself that he would definitely miss the first free throw. He wasn't even going to tease us I knew. What a waste of talent though. On a different note, Brandon convinced me that we should keep him. He was really getting into the paint tonight. He's pretty **** good. I think he'll get about 25% better too. He's a good player.


The problem with Jennings is that he only looks good when his shot is falling. If he's missing shots, which happens often, the rest of his game usually goes to **** as well.
"Lion-O would never leave Panthro out in the cold."
step3profit
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 2,593
And1: 316
Joined: Jul 10, 2007
Top

Post#175 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:09 am by galena

step3profit wrote:
galena wrote:I actually feel really bad for Monta. Despite his flaws he does seem to actually care about winning. Seems like a pretty good guy. That was just awful. When he got fouled I said aloud to myself that he would definitely miss the first free throw. He wasn't even going to tease us I knew. What a waste of talent though. On a different note, Brandon convinced me that we should keep him. He was really getting into the paint tonight. He's pretty **** good. I think he'll get about 25% better too. He's a good player.


The problem with Jennings is that he only looks good when his shot is falling. If he's missing shots, which happens often, the rest of his game usually goes to **** as well.


Yep I'm familiar with that school of thought. Devil's advocate: very few players look good when their shot is not falling, except defensive specialists. All I'm saying is that he really does have a great handle and he got into the paint a ton tonight. I've really been frustrated with him overall and have had a hard time figuring him out, but these last two games have somehow convinced me that he is worth keeping and i really think he will improve quite significantly.
"I guess..."
galena



Sophomore
User avatar
Posts: 228
And1: 3
Joined: Jun 4, 2008
Location: Shorewood, WI
Top

Post#176 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:14 am by Turd Ferguson

Stop evaluating Jennings' game on a game-by-game basis. Or get ready to evaluate his game on a game-by-game basis for the next two out of four years until you finally get fed up with it...or maybe you will not have reached a conclusion on him in 2015/2016 two years into a toxic four-year deal.
trwi7 wrote:Monta's career has done a complete 360 since he was traded here.
Turd Ferguson
Pro Prospect
Posts: 898
And1: 54
Joined: Mar 12, 2012
Location: Mediocrity, WI
Top

Post#177 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:16 am by weezybaby856

I got this sick feeling in my stomach that Milwaukee is now going to be the 3rd party involved in helping give up assets to Atlanta to send Josh to Brooklyn so we can have Brooklyn's garbage in return.

Marshon Brooks, really? Smfh.

We will send out picks, expirings and 1 of Tobias or Henson and get back Brooks, Humphries and Devin Harris, all while watching Josh end up in Brooklyn. Write it down.
Giannis + Jabari = The Future
weezybaby856




Sixth Man
User avatar
Posts: 1,908
And1: 112
Joined: Jul 4, 2008
Location: Jabari Island
Top

Post#178 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:18 am by Wooderson

As maddening as the rest of the team is, Sanders development is incredibly fun to watch. Major props to Hammond for that pick. Just wish Tobes could get 10-15 minutes a game.
Wooderson



General Manager
User avatar
Posts: 7,934
And1: 876
Joined: Mar 3, 2008
Top

Post#179 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:20 am by blazza18

Weezy mate don't be to overly concerned with that trade happening. We've already apparently turned the Nets scrubs trade down.
blazza18




RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 19,718
And1: 3,278
Joined: Dec 2, 2010
Location: Aussie bias
Top

Post#180 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:26 am by ibanezjp

So typical. All our players shrink every 4th quarter. It was such a fun game until the end. CJ **** Watson and Bogans were killing us all night. I knew when the nets took the lead we were done. Psychologically when you give up the lead in the 4th after leading the whole game you've basically lost the game. Once Bogans hit the 3 with like 5 min left after BJ and Monta both took hard falls I knew it was over and fast forwarded to the end to predictably see that they lost. I know wins and losses don't matter so much in our situation as we're pretty locked into that 8 spot but its just so frustrating last night and tonight to have fun watching the game only to have them lose at the end. Seriously thinking of not watching on Saturday. These 2 nights were so demoralizing. We literally pulled an axford these last two nights. Waste a great team effort by horrible closing of a game. **** this **** team that just kills any fun we might have watching this team.
ibanezjp



Freshman
User avatar
Posts: 76
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 16, 2010
Top

Post#181 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:31 am by weezybaby856

blazza18 wrote:Weezy mate don't be to overly concerned with that trade happening. We've already apparently turned the Nets scrubs trade down.


I hope ur right my friend, I'm getting nervous though now with these new rumors swirling around Marshon Brooks saying he "wants to play for the Bucks". I mean where does that stuff even come from? Now Devin Harris comes out and says he wouldn't mind coming home and playing for Milwaukee... Is this stuff true or just speculation or what? All the conflicting rumors the last few days make me want to pull out my hair at this point.

I just can't stop being pessimistic about somehow us really screwing this deadline up by either not making any move at all or bringing in a total goon platoon like Brooklyns garbage etc.

I would say ill be happy when the deadline passes but there's an even greater chance ill be even more upset than I'm already becoming.
Giannis + Jabari = The Future
weezybaby856




Sixth Man
User avatar
Posts: 1,908
And1: 112
Joined: Jul 4, 2008
Location: Jabari Island
Top

Post#182 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:33 am by Godgers

I want...

Eric Gordon
or
Eric Bledsoe
or any player with the first name of Eric

The better than nothing deal would be a Package with Ellis for Smith and getting Redick.

Im done watching Bucks games with Jennings and Ellis both togther as long as that will be. Even if Smith gets traded here I will not watch if Ellis stays.

I could get on board with watching Jennings, Redick, Smith, Sanders.
Godgers
Bench Warmer
User avatar
Posts: 1,323
And1: 101
Joined: Aug 8, 2012
Top

Post#183 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:45 am by AussieBuck

Godgers wrote:I want...

Eric Gordon
or
Eric Bledsoe
or any player with the first name of Eric


Image
aol4532 wrote:what exactly is the difference between him (Bill Russell), and say a guy like Ryan Hollins, who is 20 lbs heavier and can get his head over the rim? He would get in foul trouble so quick, just trying to hold position.
AussieBuck

RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 21,280
And1: 1,345
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: saveourbucks.com
Top

Post#184 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:46 am by Sherman Douglas

Whoring this thing out just cus:

Sherman Douglas
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,640
And1: 481
Joined: Dec 13, 2011
Top

Post#185 Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!
Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:00 am by Garbs_7

Godgers wrote:I want...

Eric Gordon
or
Eric Bledsoe
or any player with the first name of Eric


Eric Piatowski?
Image

www.saveourbucks.com

"Build for the future, not the 8th seed"
Garbs_7



Assistant Coach
User avatar
Posts: 3,900
And1: 260
Joined: Jan 3, 2005
Location: Perth, Australia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Milwaukee Bucks


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chapter29