yardbarker

Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

ImageImage

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby JayMKE on Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:58 pm

Marshon wants in on the Swag Train
User avatar
JayMKE
General Manager
 
Posts: 8548
And1: 18
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: AZ

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby Garbs_7 on Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:01 am

JayMKE wrote:Marshon wants in on the Swag Train


:lol: great
Image


In the front seat of the Tobias Harris Bandwagon
User avatar
Garbs_7
Veteran
 
Posts: 2984
And1: 15
Joined: Jan 3, 2005
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby paul on Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:10 am

JayMKE wrote:Marshon wants in on the Swag Train


:lol:

Feels like home.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
 
Posts: 27679
And1: 37
Joined: Dec 11, 2007

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby Wooderson on Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:12 am

I would love some Marsha on this squad, but only if we can acquire Bargnani too.
User avatar
Wooderson
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 5227
And1: 36
Joined: Mar 3, 2008

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby Wooderson on Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:15 am

GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:its been clearly discussed in the media that teams are calling on ellis. youre denying this because the only specific name thats been discussed is a borderline all star? bogut isnt good anymore. of course we can trade ellis for somebody better than bogut if were hesitant to even trade him for josh smith for crissakes.


Uh, Ellis for Smith straight up isn't happening. I will gladly come back here and give you props if it does, but there's no way ATL accepts that. If it was on the table the Bucks would have done it already. They're probably expecting one of Harris/Henson/1st in order to make it happen, and in that case Ellis would be a minor part of the deal. Ellis just isn't valuable anymore given how pathetic he's been.
User avatar
Wooderson
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 5227
And1: 36
Joined: Mar 3, 2008

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby DanoMac on Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:33 am

Image
In response to Kate Upton being the SI Swimsuit cover girl for the 2nd straight year.

Manocad wrote:
Hero wrote:Meh. She isn't all that.

I don't imagine she would look all that good to a gay man, no.
User avatar
DanoMac
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 5395
And1: 13
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: Vomiting at midcourt of the Bradley Center

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby galena on Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:37 am

I actually feel really bad for Monta. Despite his flaws he does seem to actually care about winning. Seems like a pretty good guy. That was just awful. When he got fouled I said aloud to myself that he would definitely miss the first free throw. He wasn't even going to tease us I knew. What a waste of talent though. On a different note, Brandon convinced me that we should keep him. He was really getting into the paint tonight. He's pretty **** good. I think he'll get about 25% better too. He's a good player.
"I guess..."
User avatar
galena
Sophomore
 
Posts: 187
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 4, 2008
Location: Shorewood, WI

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby EastSideBucksFan on Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:42 am

I remember when CDR wanted to Fear the Deer as well.

Good times.


I'd trade a 2nd round pick for Marshon. Not more than that though.
"So Skiles, who was the captain, pipes in and says, 'Look, mother-------, quit bitching with each other and acting like a couple of p------ and go ahead and fight.' "
User avatar
EastSideBucksFan
RealGM
 
Posts: 11049
And1: 33
Joined: Jan 31, 2006

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby step3profit on Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:48 am

galena wrote:I actually feel really bad for Monta. Despite his flaws he does seem to actually care about winning. Seems like a pretty good guy. That was just awful. When he got fouled I said aloud to myself that he would definitely miss the first free throw. He wasn't even going to tease us I knew. What a waste of talent though. On a different note, Brandon convinced me that we should keep him. He was really getting into the paint tonight. He's pretty **** good. I think he'll get about 25% better too. He's a good player.


The problem with Jennings is that he only looks good when his shot is falling. If he's missing shots, which happens often, the rest of his game usually goes to **** as well.
this town needs an enema.
User avatar
step3profit
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1944
And1: 7
Joined: Jul 10, 2007

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby galena on Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:09 am

step3profit wrote:
galena wrote:I actually feel really bad for Monta. Despite his flaws he does seem to actually care about winning. Seems like a pretty good guy. That was just awful. When he got fouled I said aloud to myself that he would definitely miss the first free throw. He wasn't even going to tease us I knew. What a waste of talent though. On a different note, Brandon convinced me that we should keep him. He was really getting into the paint tonight. He's pretty **** good. I think he'll get about 25% better too. He's a good player.


The problem with Jennings is that he only looks good when his shot is falling. If he's missing shots, which happens often, the rest of his game usually goes to **** as well.


Yep I'm familiar with that school of thought. Devil's advocate: very few players look good when their shot is not falling, except defensive specialists. All I'm saying is that he really does have a great handle and he got into the paint a ton tonight. I've really been frustrated with him overall and have had a hard time figuring him out, but these last two games have somehow convinced me that he is worth keeping and i really think he will improve quite significantly.
"I guess..."
User avatar
galena
Sophomore
 
Posts: 187
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 4, 2008
Location: Shorewood, WI

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby Turd Ferguson on Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:14 am

Stop evaluating Jennings' game on a game-by-game basis. Or get ready to evaluate his game on a game-by-game basis for the next two out of four years until you finally get fed up with it...or maybe you will not have reached a conclusion on him in 2015/2016 two years into a toxic four-year deal.
trwi7 wrote:Monta's career has done a complete 360 since he was traded here.


"Monta Ellis have it all." - Monta Ellis
Turd Ferguson
Senior
 
Posts: 594
And1: 4
Joined: Mar 12, 2012

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby weezybaby856 on Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:16 am

I got this sick feeling in my stomach that Milwaukee is now going to be the 3rd party involved in helping give up assets to Atlanta to send Josh to Brooklyn so we can have Brooklyn's garbage in return.

Marshon Brooks, really? Smfh.

We will send out picks, expirings and 1 of Tobias or Henson and get back Brooks, Humphries and Devin Harris, all while watching Josh end up in Brooklyn. Write it down.
Build around Larry Sanders. He is the future.
User avatar
weezybaby856
Pro Prospect
 
Posts: 998
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 4, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby Wooderson on Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:18 am

As maddening as the rest of the team is, Sanders development is incredibly fun to watch. Major props to Hammond for that pick. Just wish Tobes could get 10-15 minutes a game.
User avatar
Wooderson
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 5227
And1: 36
Joined: Mar 3, 2008

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby blazza18 on Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:20 am

Weezy mate don't be to overly concerned with that trade happening. We've already apparently turned the Nets scrubs trade down.
Where mediocrity happens
User avatar
blazza18
General Manager
 
Posts: 8753
And1: 61
Joined: Dec 2, 2010
Location: Land of Aus

Re: Nets Postgame: Panace Trade(s) Time Baby!!!!!!!

Postby ibanezjp on Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:26 am

So typical. All our players shrink every 4th quarter. It was such a fun game until the end. CJ **** Watson and Bogans were killing us all night. I knew when the nets took the lead we were done. Psychologically when you give up the lead in the 4th after leading the whole game you've basically lost the game. Once Bogans hit the 3 with like 5 min left after BJ and Monta both took hard falls I knew it was over and fast forwarded to the end to predictably see that they lost. I know wins and losses don't matter so much in our situation as we're pretty locked into that 8 spot but its just so frustrating last night and tonight to have fun watching the game only to have them lose at the end. Seriously thinking of not watching on Saturday. These 2 nights were so demoralizing. We literally pulled an axford these last two nights. Waste a great team effort by horrible closing of a game. **** this **** team that just kills any fun we might have watching this team.
User avatar
ibanezjp
Freshman
 
Posts: 65
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 16, 2010

PreviousNext

Return to Milwaukee Bucks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bulldog424, Great, Miasma, mlloyd10, Ron Swanson, wichmae