Official Tobias Harris watch thread (The End)

LUKE23 · Post #5621 » by **LUKE23** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 3:56 am

24 points, 5 rebounds, 4 assists, 5 steals, 1 block, 0 TO, 10-17 FG, +15 in a W.

0BobLobLaw0 · Post #5622 » by **0BobLobLaw0** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 4:03 am

LUKE23 wrote:24 points, 5 rebounds, 4 assists, 5 steals, 1 block, 0 TO, 10-17 FG, +15 in a W.

Ya, but we got JJ redick for almost a half season.

emunney · Post #5623 » by **emunney** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 4:06 am

Was Josh Smith guarding him? Because that would just be the best.

mojosodope · Post #5624 » by **mojosodope** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 5:35 am

emunney wrote:Was Josh Smith guarding him? Because that would just be the best.

Pretty much and he had 7 points, 4 TO, 0 Rebounds

ampd · Post #5625 » by **ampd** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 5:38 am

bizarro wrote:I simply cringe at the realization we could have Tobes, Giannis, and Parker. And, if not Parker...surely Exum. It just makes me sick.

Our lineup this year could be Knight / Exum / Giannis / Tobes / Larry. :lol:

breakchains · Post #5626 » by **breakchains** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 5:50 am

Regarding Redick, I know the Clippers have to be sick that they gave up Bledsoe for him (and Dudley :lol:

). Should have just extended Bledsoe at a discount and ran a CP3/Bledsoe back court. Would be in much better position than they are now.

paul · Post #5627 » by **paul** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:40 am

1 assist off a 4 x 5 game with 24 points on 17 shots in a win. Oh, and he's reached the grand old age of 22.

Oooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhh JJ.

Dcebucks11 · Post #5628 » by **Dcebucks11** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:41 am

ampd wrote:
bizarro wrote:I simply cringe at the realization we could have Tobes, Giannis, and Parker. And, if not Parker...surely Exum. It just makes me sick.

Our lineup this year could be Knight / Exum / Giannis / Tobes / Larry.

nah tobes would of cost the bucks losses last year and prob out of reach for exum

Bucks_MacGyver · Post #5629 » by **Bucks_MacGyver** » Thu Nov 20, 2014 9:37 pm

with the crazy night last night no one even noticed that Harris had 25 again

Outlander · Post #5630 » by **Outlander** » Fri Nov 21, 2014 2:11 pm

When your own team gets better and has their own good players people don't tend to care about other teams good players. I consider that a good thing and progress.

Bucks_MacGyver · Post #5631 » by **Bucks_MacGyver** » Fri Nov 21, 2014 2:35 pm

Outlander wrote:When your own team gets better and has their own good players people don't tend to care about other teams good players. I consider that a good thing and progress.

This is literally like getting over an old ex.

Post #5632 » by **Ruzious** » Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:04 pm

I know he has some real nice stats for a losing team, but If Tobes is the proverbial "one that got away", I'm okay with that. Most teams have at least one at least as good.

Treebeard · Post #5633 » by **Treebeard** » Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:09 pm

Ruzious wrote:I know he has some real nice stats for a losing team, but If Tobes is the proverbial "one that got away", I'm okay with that. Most teams have at least one at least as good.

I think for many of us, it's not just that Tobe's is the One-that-got-away; it's the fundamentally moronic short-sighted thinking that drove the deal in the first place. It was a poor deal in concept, and it did not get better in reality.

The short-sighted thinking is the part that needs to be remembered.

Shaffty · Post #5634 » by **Shaffty** » Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:12 pm

Treebeard wrote:
Ruzious wrote:I know he has some real nice stats for a losing team, but If Tobes is the proverbial "one that got away", I'm okay with that. Most teams have at least one at least as good.

I think for many of us, it's not just that Tobe's is the One-that-got-away; it's the fundamentally moronic short-sighted thinking that drove the deal in the first place. It was a poor deal in concept, and it did not get better in reality.

The short-sighted thinking is the part that needs to be remembered.

But that's the old regime so why still be upset

Sent from my HTC One using RealGM Forums mobile app

Ron Swanson · Post #5635 » by **Ron Swanson** » Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:35 pm

I don't think anybody of sound mind is still trying to "justify" the deal, nor denying that it was "short-sighted". But I also don't think that it needs to be hammered into our heads every time Tobes scores more than 15 points on decent efficiency.

We all know what happened and I wouldn't have changed anything about it seeing as where we are now. I could honestly care less about what Tobes is doing down in Orlando anymore.

I probably speak for a lot of people when I say that I just don't give a ****.

emunney · Post #5636 » by **emunney** » Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:37 pm

I think when people actually don't give a ****, it doesn't occur to them to tell anybody about it.

Chapter29 · Post #5637 » by **Chapter29** » Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:40 pm

I don't care one bit about Tobias Harris. Other than he's a decent player on a crappy team.

Should we have made the trade?....no of course not. Is it water under the bridge? Yep. We've replaced him with better players.

If we had Tobias Harris, it is a very strong possibility we don't have one of Giannis or Parker. Not sure what would have taken place had he stayed. Do we still select Giannis, do we lose enough games to select Parker. Things like that.

I'll take Giannis 100 times over Harris. I would take Parker over Harris too.

Tobias Harris....who?

Treebeard · Post #5638 » by **Treebeard** » Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:41 pm

Shaffty wrote:
Treebeard wrote:
Ruzious wrote:I know he has some real nice stats for a losing team, but If Tobes is the proverbial "one that got away", I'm okay with that. Most teams have at least one at least as good.

I think for many of us, it's not just that Tobe's is the One-that-got-away; it's the fundamentally moronic short-sighted thinking that drove the deal in the first place. It was a poor deal in concept, and it did not get better in reality.

The short-sighted thinking is the part that needs to be remembered.

But that's the old regime so why still be upset

Sent from my HTC One using RealGM Forums mobile app

Hammond & Morway are still on board. It remains un-certain who drove the boat on the deal, Hammond or Kohl & Kronies. In any case, Hammond executed the deal.

And yes, every good GM pooches a deal at some point; but you don't get do-overs. This one was bad before it was completed, and it was one of a series of questionable deals. Can Hammond find redemption: probably. The Knight/Middleton for Jennings deal worked in the Bucks favor. However, no backsliding allowed....

LUKE23 · Post #5639 » by **LUKE23** » Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:43 pm

Chapter29 wrote:I don't care one bit about Tobias Harris. Other than he's a decent player on a crappy team.

Should we have made the trade?....no of course not. Is it water under the bridge? Yep. We've replaced him with better players.

If we had Tobias Harris, it is a very strong possibility we don't have one of Giannis or Parker. Not sure what would have taken place had he stayed. Do we still select Giannis, do we lose enough games to select Parker. Things like that.

I'll take Giannis 100 times over Harris. I would take Parker over Harris too.

Tobias Harris....who?

We could legitimately have all three or we could have Giannis/Harris/Exum. We'd definitely still have Giannis.

engelmartin · Post #5640 » by **engelmartin** » Fri Nov 21, 2014 4:44 pm

I like how our team is playing now. But, like PaulPressey said years ago, he does have a lot of similarities to Jabari. I think I always just didn't want them to be so evenly matched as prospects.