The Bucks organization is ran properly! Show our support!

RandyBreuer · Post #141 » by **RandyBreuer** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:28 pm

he's not passing, he is recovering his dribble about to jack a 22 footer

kid idioteque · Post #142 » by **kid idioteque** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:29 pm

I have no problem with the concept of a "bag night," but doing it at Redick's first game as a Buck could send the wrong signal, IMO.

Bad Midget · Post #143 » by **Bad Midget** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:37 pm

I've followed the Bucks for 15 years, no need to get on your high horse about being a casual fan. I've accepted the fact that Kohl will never ever ever rebuild, so I just try to enjoy good professional basketbal while it's here.

bullox · Post #144 » by **bullox** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:39 pm

BigDoggyStyle wrote:Breaking News: Monta can actually pass.

He is a good passer. He just chooses to jack up bad shots more than he chooses to pass.

BigDoggyStyle · Post #145 » by **BigDoggyStyle** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:47 pm

RandyBreuer wrote:he's not passing, he is recovering his dribble about to jack a 22 footer

LOL. I just find it hilarious that they have him depicted this way in his bobble.

VooDoo7 · Post #146 » by **VooDoo7** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 6:17 pm

Bad Midget wrote:I've accepted the fact that Kohl will never ever ever rebuild, so I just try to enjoy good professional basketbal while it's here.

"Good basketball" is here? I must have a differen't opinion of "good" than you.

theFireBlanket · Post #147 » by **theFireBlanket** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 6:22 pm

The face on the Monta bobblehead looks like a light skinned version of Buddha.

VooDoo7 · Post #148 » by **VooDoo7** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 6:37 pm

There's a lot of money to be made if you started a business that actually make bobbleheads look like their real life counterparts.

GhOsTofBDubPast · Post #149 » by **GhOsTofBDubPast** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 7:41 pm

whatthe_buck!? · Post #150 » by **whatthe_buck!?** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 7:52 pm

Oh and bdub, I take it u liked the Redick trade? If I did not like it as much as u seem to is that something we can debate?

Post #151 » by **humanrefutation** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:05 pm

Ideally, there should always be a wait-and-see approach. But that doesn't mean we can't judge the logic and immediate impact of a trade. If no one could ever do such a thing, then how can we make any trades at all? Immediate valuation is a necessary component of making a deal. I mean, both the Bucks and Magic think they made the right trade. Could they be disproven down the line? Of course. But that doesn't mean you can't judge whether the logic behind the move makes sense at that time. It's really not that complicated, honestly.

Scoops · Post #152 » by **Scoops** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:21 pm

CanadaBucks · Post #153 » by **CanadaBucks** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:31 pm

whatthe_buck!? wrote: but for the future? How do the Bucks look if tobes pans out? Very poorly....how does the Bucks look if Tobes is flipping burgers? Very good.

Some of the posters on here have that covered. If he pans out Hammond is stupid for trading him. If he's flipping burgers or w/e it's because Skiles abused him and ruined his self-esteem thus rendering him useless. Book it.

LUKE23 · Post #154 » by **LUKE23** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:42 pm

You see negativity, but I'll flip it around. I don't believe being constantly negative about a franchise that has been between terrible and mediocre for essentially a quarter century as unwarranted. I also don't view it as more annoying than the people who are massive apologists and spend all of their time defending poor moves by the franchise, while also having embarrassingly low standards of what is expected out of a professional sports organization (i.e. trying to contend for a title). This is pro sports, not high school. People are getting paid a ton of money to run the team and play the game, so there is a bare minimum of standard expected over the long haul. The Bucks have failed and failed miserably in every aspect of that. That's why this franchise can't give tickets away. They aren't legitimately trying to win anything relevant.

Also, I'll add that your grammar is still ****.

drew881 · Post #155 » by **drew881** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:50 pm

He does have a point that some users on here use this board as an outlet to express a level of negativity they simply couldn't get away with on an everyday basis. But hey, its the internet. It is where a manic anonymous voicing of opinion allows people to go overboard, and create a persona they would never dare embody in public. Sports radio and talk radio operate fairly similarly. At least this board is sometimes used to organize some worthwhile ballsyness (bag night I, Squad 6 in Indy)...hope tonight is a success.

LUKE23 · Post #156 » by **LUKE23** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:01 pm

MikeIsGood · Post #157 » by **MikeIsGood** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:07 pm

trwi7 · Post #158 » by **trwi7** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:11 pm

sneakerdust wrote:hope he doesnt get himself banned - i see much humor in the future.

Once you're outed as a previously banned poster and he did that just by his username you can't "get yourself banned" you just get banned.

worthlessBucks · Post #159 » by **worthlessBucks** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:27 pm

Tell us how you feel.

Sigra · Post #160 » by **Sigra** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:33 pm

whatthe_buck!? wrote:Ok, I'm open to examining ur perspective. The key question I have however is what should we talk about in the meantime while we're waiting for what u deem to be enough evidence to debate moves made by the Bucks? Should we just shut the board down during periods where empirical evidence is not being accumulated?

Talk about whatever you want but don't go to Bucks home games with plan to make diversion and bad atmosphere. How about that?