Aaron It Out wrote:Actually sounds like something I might like to be a part of.
Sounds better than coloured eggs and crucifixes, at least.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Aaron It Out wrote:Actually sounds like something I might like to be a part of.
Ron Swanson wrote:I doubt that we could put together an enticing enough package for them to even consider trading the pick, but if it did happen, I'd be salivating at the prospect of a Vonleh + Embiid frontcourt for the next decade
Ruzious wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:I doubt that we could put together an enticing enough package for them to even consider trading the pick, but if it did happen, I'd be salivating at the prospect of a Vonleh + Embiid frontcourt for the next decade
Vonleh's a good but not great prospect. There are questions on his length - which will be answered at the combine, and he's just not a real aggressive player. He lacks that extra will to score that Randle has. And he's obviously not a Chris Bosh level talent.
Ron Swanson wrote:Ruzious wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:I doubt that we could put together an enticing enough package for them to even consider trading the pick, but if it did happen, I'd be salivating at the prospect of a Vonleh + Embiid frontcourt for the next decade
Vonleh's a good but not great prospect. There are questions on his length - which will be answered at the combine, and he's just not a real aggressive player. He lacks that extra will to score that Randle has. And he's obviously not a Chris Bosh level talent.
I haven't heard anything about this. By every measurement I've seen he sports an impressive 7'3 wingspan (7'4 at the 2013 Hoops Summit) and 6'10, 240 lb frame. If anything it's his length that is one of the things about him that scouts are raving about. I also have him above Randle, but not by much.
Sherman Douglas wrote:PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:Sherman, can you at least tell me why my statement in your sig is so preposterous?
Yours isn't nearly as bad as some of the others. The point is more that this board has a tendency to engage in groupthink and come to a consensus on a player, and any time someone disagrees with that consensus, it's simply crazy talk. It happened with Jennings his rookie year...it kinda happened with Sanders for awhile before he went off the deep end. Now it's Giannis. I think he could be a really good player, but I don't think it's even close to a foregone conclusion.
UWM_Brew_Buck wrote:Is there a reason why you left out that the most egregious quote was made by lilOjMayo?
Ayt wrote:lilojmayo wouldn't be one to post something ridiculous.
http://boards.grizzliesonline.com/index ... t&p=405411
trwi7 wrote:Will be practicing my best Australian accent for tomorrow.
"Hey ya wankers. I graduated from Aranmore back in 2010 and lost me yearbook. Is there any way you didgeridoos can send anotha yearbook me way?"
Newz wrote:Someone said his floor is Scottie Pippen? So what the hell is his ceiling in that particular scenario? All the best of Durant, LeBron and KG combined into one super player?
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:Newz wrote:Someone said his floor is Scottie Pippen? So what the hell is his ceiling in that particular scenario? All the best of Durant, LeBron and KG combined into one super player?
7 ft MJ/Kareem/Magic hyrbrid.
Newz wrote:Someone said his floor is Scottie Pippen? So what the hell is his ceiling in that particular scenario? All the best of Durant, LeBron and KG combined into one super player?
tski1972 wrote:so are we trading Giannis for the Lakers pick or no?