Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,574
- And1: 3,597
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
This post has really reached unreadability. I keep checking in to see if the new posts are actually pertinent to the topic, and I get pages and pages of this crap. Can this get closed or something until new information comes out?
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
- JimmyTheKid
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,878
- And1: 5,105
- Joined: Feb 10, 2009
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
Recently, every time I read a Newz post, I hear...
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cjv7hEAytU[/youtube]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cjv7hEAytU[/youtube]
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 110,861
- And1: 26,373
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
JimmyTheKid wrote:Recently, every time I read a Newz post, I hear...
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cjv7hEAytU[/youtube]
But it's not just him who thinks it.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,156
- And1: 36,636
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
Yo momma so fat, we all inside 'er.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
Balls2TheWalls wrote:This post has really reached unreadability. I keep checking in to see if the new posts are actually pertinent to the topic, and I get pages and pages of this crap. Can this get closed or something until new information comes out?
+1
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 30,424
- And1: 13,940
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
No, please, let's keep it going. I'd like to hear Newz and GAD/Europa et al go a few more rounds of
Newz: "I kind of think you have some connections but I also don't think you're an insider,"
GAD/Europa/etc: "I'm totally an insider but I don't post here because criticism offends me"
Newz: "Don't know why you care what I think. Stop being so offended"
GAD/Europa: "I'm not offended but I don't like reading through posts that offend me."
It's really going somewhere.
Newz: "I kind of think you have some connections but I also don't think you're an insider,"
GAD/Europa/etc: "I'm totally an insider but I don't post here because criticism offends me"
Newz: "Don't know why you care what I think. Stop being so offended"
GAD/Europa: "I'm not offended but I don't like reading through posts that offend me."
It's really going somewhere.
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
- raferfenix
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,833
- And1: 3,526
- Joined: Apr 05, 2003
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
This whole fight doesn't make sense.
Rumors and even 2nd hand bits of inside information are great! It makes no sense to try and limit this stuff from being passed onto this board by making it such a pain for those who do so.
Our community would be a much better place if we could discuss the latest from the likes of europa / CBQ / GAD etc. more often. Their track record speaks for itself.
Moreover, we have a new regime in place now, and new insiders will soon be in our midst as those who hadn't been getting information start to receive it from new sources.
Let's fix this state of affairs to take advantage of it!
Rumors and even 2nd hand bits of inside information are great! It makes no sense to try and limit this stuff from being passed onto this board by making it such a pain for those who do so.
Our community would be a much better place if we could discuss the latest from the likes of europa / CBQ / GAD etc. more often. Their track record speaks for itself.
Moreover, we have a new regime in place now, and new insiders will soon be in our midst as those who hadn't been getting information start to receive it from new sources.
Let's fix this state of affairs to take advantage of it!
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
- step3profit
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,162
- And1: 819
- Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
My sources say this thread is about to get locked.
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 110,861
- And1: 26,373
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
raferfenix wrote:This whole fight doesn't make sense.
Rumors and even 2nd hand bits of inside information are great! It makes no sense to try and limit this stuff from being passed onto this board by making it such a pain for those who do so.
Our community would be a much better place if we could discuss the latest from the likes of europa / CBQ / GAD etc. more often. Their track record speaks for itself.
Moreover, we have a new regime in place now, and new insiders will soon be in our midst as those who hadn't been getting information start to receive it from new sources.
Let's fix this state of affairs to take advantage of it!
Once again, I don't have a problem with rumors like "The Bucks are targeting this player and are willing to give up this but the other team wants this in addition." Those are substantive and fun to talk about, even if they don't happen. What I do have a problem with is "Fans are going to be surprised by what the Bucks are going to do. Especially since half the stories out there are BS."
Okay, that doesn't tell anybody anything. If you're going to act like an insider by posting stuff like that, at the very least you should say what stories out there are BS to put at least a little bit of credibility on the line.
There's pretty much always a move that surprises the board so by posting something like that you can become an "insider" because something happened that the board didn't expect to happen.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 60,924
- And1: 26,000
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
Re: Bucks close to signing Bayless (also Bledsoe discussion)
step3profit wrote:My sources say this thread is about to get locked.
You must be BuckPack with those sources.....
Let's just take Bledsoe conversation to the off-season thread.
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=1323497&p=40756812#p40756812