With #17 the Bucks take...
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
With #17 the Bucks take...
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,959
- And1: 2,807
- Joined: May 25, 2005
- Location: Voorschoten
With #17 the Bucks take...
I've looked at different mock drafts and these are in the top 16 mostly:
1-4: Okafor - Towns - Russell - Mudiay
5-10: Winslow - Hezonja - WCS - Porzingis - Johnson - Turner
11-16: Booker - Kaminsky - Dekker - Payne - Lyles - Portis
* You have 2 options, so if you think your 1st choise might not be available, you can also give your 2nd choise.
* Don't take the 1st option if you don't think someone drops outside this top 16, or there is someone in this top 16 you don't want for the Bucks.
* Pick your personal preference, not the one you think the Bucks will take.
* You are allowed to change your vote.
* Poll is open until June 25
1-4: Okafor - Towns - Russell - Mudiay
5-10: Winslow - Hezonja - WCS - Porzingis - Johnson - Turner
11-16: Booker - Kaminsky - Dekker - Payne - Lyles - Portis
* You have 2 options, so if you think your 1st choise might not be available, you can also give your 2nd choise.
* Don't take the 1st option if you don't think someone drops outside this top 16, or there is someone in this top 16 you don't want for the Bucks.
* Pick your personal preference, not the one you think the Bucks will take.
* You are allowed to change your vote.
* Poll is open until June 25
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,203
- And1: 36,721
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
I took Tyus and Oubre.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,554
- And1: 5,473
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
- Location: Into the Great White Nothing
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
Is this our personal preference or who we project them to take?
"TRADE GIANNIS" - Magic Giannison
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,959
- And1: 2,807
- Joined: May 25, 2005
- Location: Voorschoten
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
Bernman wrote:Is this our personal preference or who we project them to take?
personal preference
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,446
- And1: 10,595
- Joined: Mar 28, 2013
- Location: Renewed Hope
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
Went with Grant and Oubre.
VooDoo7 wrote:JEIS wrote:
Kidd would have curb stomped him.
Maybe if his name was Denise instead of Dennis.
Fotis St wrote:Wherever you are David, I love you man.
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,279
- And1: 1,012
- Joined: Apr 10, 2015
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
DutchManDanFan wrote:Bernman wrote:Is this our personal preference or who we project them to take?
personal preference
If it's personal preference, why would the title be "with #17 the bucks take..."? That seems to imply what we think the bucks will do, rather than what we want or prefer the bucks to do.
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 30,450
- And1: 13,969
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
Grant and Jones.
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,959
- And1: 2,807
- Joined: May 25, 2005
- Location: Voorschoten
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
German Athens wrote:If it's personal preference, why would the title be "with #17 the bucks take..."? That seems to imply what we think the bucks will do, rather than what we want or prefer the bucks to do.
You know now and you can change your vote.
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,279
- And1: 1,012
- Joined: Apr 10, 2015
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
DutchManDanFan wrote:German Athens wrote:If it's personal preference, why would the title be "with #17 the bucks take..."? That seems to imply what we think the bucks will do, rather than what we want or prefer the bucks to do.
You know now and you can change your vote.
Yeah, but will other people who vote know? I just think the voting could be skewed if half are voting for who people think the bucks will take vs who they like personally. I could be off on this, maybe people would vote the same in either case.
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,554
- And1: 5,473
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
- Location: Into the Great White Nothing
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
See, I think some of these other guys will be available too, so I'd want to express my preference in the form of a big board among the possibles.
My big board is:
1. Cameron Payne
2. Jerian Grant
3. Sam Dekker
4. Devin Booker
5. Tyus Jones
5. Bobby Portis
6. Montrezl Harrell
7. Delon Wright
Anybody on that list I'd be fine with, in that order of preference.
Anybody else off the list I'd be disappointed by to varying degrees. Somewhat disappointed by Looney, Oubre, Lyles, and Anderson. Majorly disappointed by Hunter, Vaughn, Wood, Hernangomez, and RHJ.
I think the f.o. is looking at it in a similar way because they say they have their group of 10 players and they'll take the highest among those rankings. And I'm sure it doesn't exclude players who are slightly probable to be gone. I don't see the point in leaving off most of those 11-16 guys because they seem virtual 50/50 to be available. And then if they fall they are theoretically "value picks".
But within your parameters I went Payne.
My big board is:
1. Cameron Payne
2. Jerian Grant
3. Sam Dekker
4. Devin Booker
5. Tyus Jones
5. Bobby Portis
6. Montrezl Harrell
7. Delon Wright
Anybody on that list I'd be fine with, in that order of preference.
Anybody else off the list I'd be disappointed by to varying degrees. Somewhat disappointed by Looney, Oubre, Lyles, and Anderson. Majorly disappointed by Hunter, Vaughn, Wood, Hernangomez, and RHJ.
I think the f.o. is looking at it in a similar way because they say they have their group of 10 players and they'll take the highest among those rankings. And I'm sure it doesn't exclude players who are slightly probable to be gone. I don't see the point in leaving off most of those 11-16 guys because they seem virtual 50/50 to be available. And then if they fall they are theoretically "value picks".
But within your parameters I went Payne.
"TRADE GIANNIS" - Magic Giannison
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,289
- And1: 6,239
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
If the board fell like you had in the original post, it's Oubre pretty easily for me. Tyus #2.
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,132
- And1: 2,279
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
I do not think they stay at 17, I think they move up.....for the sake of this poll chose anyone who falls and Oubre. I am ok with grant, jones would be the last guy I want.
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
- MadBlueEdwards
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,024
- And1: 1,317
- Joined: Sep 24, 2010
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
1. Oubre
2. Someone else (Portis)
2. Someone else (Portis)
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,591
- And1: 11,556
- Joined: May 23, 2004
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
All signs point to trading back for Andzejs Pasecniks.
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,959
- And1: 2,807
- Joined: May 25, 2005
- Location: Voorschoten
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
German Athens wrote:Yeah, but will other people who vote know? I just think the voting could be skewed if half are voting for who people think the bucks will take vs who they like personally. I could be off on this, maybe people would vote the same in either case.
Alright, I changed the 1st post.
Bernman wrote:I don't see the point in leaving off most of those 11-16 guys because they seem virtual 50/50 to be available. And then if they fall they are theoretically "value picks".
The poll can only have 10 options. If someone from this top 16 drops it looks likely it will be the Bucks pick (BPA). That's why I added the first option for anyone who drops. It becomes difficult if you don't like everyone from this top 16, but for this poll it doesn't matter that much.
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
- Badgerlander
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,413
- And1: 6,978
- Joined: Jun 29, 2007
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
Oubre
Tyus (doubt we go after him though)
Vaughn
Looney
Tyus (doubt we go after him though)
Vaughn
Looney
Shoot, Move, and Communicate...
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Spoiler:
Countless waze, we pass the daze...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 98,534
- And1: 35,009
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
Not necessarily who I want but I'm predicting Oubre or Hunter at this point.
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
- M-C-G
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,870
- And1: 9,368
- Joined: Jan 13, 2013
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
I'm hoping for move up, or Frank falling but I think at this point;
Hunter or Vaughn
Hunter or Vaughn
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
- Matches Malone
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,531
- And1: 20,568
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Re: With #17 the Bucks take...
Hoping for Booker, but I'd be fine with Oubre, Hunter or Portis.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?