Arena Bill Debate - City Council Passes Bill 12-3 - IT'S DONE
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 92,280
- And1: 44,904
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
This is related since it involves development around the area, in this case Lambeau. Starting out with high end hotel, brewpub, sports medcine clinic and a large public area/park with more to come. I'm anxious to see the Bucks plans but I imagine that's not for awhile. We still don't even have detailed arena plans (although they've been promised by month end)
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/packers-unveil-plans-for-titletown-district-next-to-lambeau-field-b99560708z1-322418821.html
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/packers-unveil-plans-for-titletown-district-next-to-lambeau-field-b99560708z1-322418821.html
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
- Stoltz3
- Junior
- Posts: 462
- And1: 216
- Joined: Jun 02, 2015
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
Man, two huge development projects slated for two of Wisconsin's pro sports teams. This is awesome.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
"Have you seen the movie, 'Like Mike?' Where he wears the shoes and is balling like Jordan? That's the
sleeve. Do it like Giannis."
- Giannis Antetokounmpo
sleeve. Do it like Giannis."
- Giannis Antetokounmpo
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
- MadBlueEdwards
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,024
- And1: 1,317
- Joined: Sep 24, 2010
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
Kirchen article on new arena negotiations regarding design, financing, and contractors:
http://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/blog/2015/08/new-milwaukee-bucks-arena-if-you-thought-getting-a.html?ana=twt
http://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/blog/2015/08/new-milwaukee-bucks-arena-if-you-thought-getting-a.html?ana=twt
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
- VooDoo7
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,115
- And1: 20,790
- Joined: Jan 14, 2012
- Location: WI
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
MadBlueEdwards wrote:Kirchen article on new arena negotiations regarding design, financing, and contractors:
http://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/blog/2015/08/new-milwaukee-bucks-arena-if-you-thought-getting-a.html?ana=twt
I'd say there's 1% chance of the new arena being done before the 2017 season.
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
- drew881
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,078
- And1: 4,969
- Joined: Aug 14, 2007
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
MadBlueEdwards wrote:Kirchen article on new arena negotiations regarding design, financing, and contractors:
http://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/blog/2015/08/new-milwaukee-bucks-arena-if-you-thought-getting-a.html?ana=twt
They already picked local firms to work alongside the KC people. Don't let the local business people F this up. The plan looks great so far.
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
- mbradleyc
- Freshman
- Posts: 74
- And1: 35
- Joined: May 08, 2015
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
R-E-L-A-X! The heavy lifting is over. This is just nuts and bolts.
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,712
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
Bucks have spent more than anyone in WI lobbying in 2015.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/sbauerAP/status/634756958189432832[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/sbauerAP/status/634756958189432832[/tweet]
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,712
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
[tweet]https://twitter.com/news3jessica/status/634759392559276033[/tweet]
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
- drew881
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,078
- And1: 4,969
- Joined: Aug 14, 2007
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
EastSideBucksFan wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/news3jessica/status/634759392559276033[/tweet]
Spend 400,000 dollars to get 250 mil in public funding. A no-brainer.
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
- mcfromage
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,815
- And1: 840
- Joined: May 03, 2007
- Location: California
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
Could someone with a subscription post this article, or excerpts?
http://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/print-edition/2015/08/21/now-the-hard-part-arena-project-a-complex-puzzle.html
http://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/print-edition/2015/08/21/now-the-hard-part-arena-project-a-complex-puzzle.html
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,176
- And1: 6,392
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
Just curious what everyone thinks of the fact that Walker basically cut $250 million from our Universities and gave $250 million to the Bradley Center on the same day.
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,240
- And1: 1,772
- Joined: Sep 22, 2009
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
Profound23 wrote:Just curious what everyone thinks of the fact that Walker basically cut $250 million from our Universities and gave $250 million to the Bradley Center on the same day.
It was not a simple diversion of 250mil from UW system to the Bucks.
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,712
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
Profound23 wrote:Just curious what everyone thinks of the fact that Walker basically cut $250 million from our Universities and gave $250 million to the Bradley Center on the same day.
Your question doesn't even make sense.
$250M didn't go to the Bradley Center.
The state only has $70M in the arena game right now while UW system lost funds due to their $600M surplus.
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,465
- And1: 11,562
- Joined: Mar 13, 2010
- Location: Get your ass to Mars
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
bucksfansince88 wrote:Profound23 wrote:Just curious what everyone thinks of the fact that Walker basically cut $250 million from our Universities and gave $250 million to the Bradley Center on the same day.
It was not a simple diversion of 250mil from UW system to the Bucks.
ESBF is right, but the optics are pretty terrible, especially here in Madison. I'm not nuts about public money going to a well-heeled private enterprise, but when you factor in the infrastructure improvements, the opportunity to breathe life into a moribund area and the potential domino effects of more development, I'm cautiously hopeful. 250M is 250M, but this is not the public giveaway that's happened elsewhere. Hell, it's a better deal than what happened in Green Bay for Lambeau. And I'd be first in line to pull the lever on Walker's testicular electrocution.
“I went to Toronto, I went to Atlanta/I used to drink Pepsi, but now I like Fanta.”
-Hannibal Burress's impression of Canadian music figure Drake
MickeyDavis: "OT Pants is gone forever. Cherish the Memory." (3/28/23)
-Hannibal Burress's impression of Canadian music figure Drake
MickeyDavis: "OT Pants is gone forever. Cherish the Memory." (3/28/23)
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
- MartyConlonOnTheRun
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,555
- And1: 10,830
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
Profound23 wrote:Just curious what everyone thinks of the fact that Walker basically cut $250 million from our Universities and gave $250 million to the Bradley Center on the same day.
I'm curious what you think is considered a fact.
As for what I think you are asking, I think it sucks they cut 250M from the UW, but that doesn't have anything to do with the bucks. Considering the FACT that the budget would have a gap if the Bucks left, I would bet the future cuts would be even higher for the universities. Be thankful that the Bucks are still in state while bringing in national income to be taxed allowing for a more social services at the state level.
On Facebook I saw a meme showing Roger Goodell making $44M and the NFL stealing taxpayers money since they are a "non-profit." I find it so ironic people pushing for that money to go into education don't take the time to make educated statements about these issues. Instead, they go straight to the headline article. If you made the argument no taxpayer money should go to the stadium as a general principle... Fine, I disagree with it but at least it is a rational thought. Or that the state should've played hard ball with the Bucks and said, nope you only get $40M or some other offer. I agree with that and thought the Bucks created a false dichotomy.
It really is just intellectually dishonesty or just plain ignorance to write that Walker gave $250M to the Bucks straight from the UW budget.
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
- th87
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,823
- And1: 9,415
- Joined: Dec 04, 2005
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
Yeah, it's absurd. I despise Walker, but the financing of UW and the arena is totally different.
The arena will be funded through bond issues (i.e. new money/loans from bondholders), issued by the state ($55M), county ($55M), city ($47M), and WCD ($93M) (simplistic, I know). These bonds, when they mature, need to be paid back with interest. This means that bonds must generally be used on projects that generate revenue directly (or if the issuer finds some other new income with which to pay back, as in the case of the county).
And of the four bond-issuing entities, only the state would be interested in the UW system. WCD doesn't care about UW, and a state-funded school system is not a municipal responsibility.
In essence then, UW cuts, as far as I know, is to existing state funding. The Bucks arena is future bonding (loans). You could maybe argue that WI could've issued bonds to fund UW some more, but I don't know how it would've raised new money directly to pay the bondholders back. Jock tax revenue, however, is a direct effect of WI's issuance of bonds.
The arena will be funded through bond issues (i.e. new money/loans from bondholders), issued by the state ($55M), county ($55M), city ($47M), and WCD ($93M) (simplistic, I know). These bonds, when they mature, need to be paid back with interest. This means that bonds must generally be used on projects that generate revenue directly (or if the issuer finds some other new income with which to pay back, as in the case of the county).
And of the four bond-issuing entities, only the state would be interested in the UW system. WCD doesn't care about UW, and a state-funded school system is not a municipal responsibility.
In essence then, UW cuts, as far as I know, is to existing state funding. The Bucks arena is future bonding (loans). You could maybe argue that WI could've issued bonds to fund UW some more, but I don't know how it would've raised new money directly to pay the bondholders back. Jock tax revenue, however, is a direct effect of WI's issuance of bonds.
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,557
- And1: 1,667
- Joined: Feb 21, 2015
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
chonestown wrote:the optics are pretty terrible
Madison is renowned as an educational community of merit. Shame to see such a valuable asset in promoting the future bled so callously.
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
- Aaron It Out
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,805
- And1: 3,101
- Joined: Jun 27, 2008
- Location: Black Mercedes
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
Profound23 wrote:Just curious what everyone thinks of the fact that Walker basically cut $250 million from our Universities and gave $250 million to the Bradley Center on the same day.
lol
$250 million in one year vs $4 million in one year.
It's almost like you don't know what you're talking about.
EastSideBucksFan wrote:At some point this board is going to have to drop their stupid bullsht agendas and just enjoy the team for once.
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,339
- And1: 698
- Joined: Feb 20, 2014
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
EastSideBucksFan wrote:Profound23 wrote:Just curious what everyone thinks of the fact that Walker basically cut $250 million from our Universities and gave $250 million to the Bradley Center on the same day.
Your question doesn't even make sense.
$250M didn't go to the Bradley Center.
The state only has $70M in the arena game right now while UW system lost funds due to their $600M surplus.
Careful now, that phrase in bold that gets bounced around is almost as bad as the original posters statement.
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,712
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
Re: Arena Bill Debate -ASSEMBLY PASSES BILL 52-34
Common Council Public Hearing on arena is 1 week from today.
Next Monday, August 31st at 4pm at City Hall.
Facebook Event Info
https://www.facebook.com/events/475823815932557/
This is the important one to be at if you can make it.
Next Monday, August 31st at 4pm at City Hall.
Facebook Event Info
https://www.facebook.com/events/475823815932557/
This is the important one to be at if you can make it.