VooDoo7 wrote:Giannis trade value is at an all-time high!! SELL!!!
Randle + Clarkson
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
VooDoo7 wrote:Giannis trade value is at an all-time high!! SELL!!!
Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.
JackSIKMA43 wrote:Trust me ... this is one FIB here, who ain't crying at all. The Bucks beating the Bulls once, is just about the equivalent, of the Packers beating the Bears twice. Or more. You guys don't get the Chicago TV postgame show. Will Perdue nearly imploded, when talking about the Bulls turnovers. It was excellent theater. It was so good, I cracked open an Amstel, and watched it again. The thought of all those idiots driving back home tonight, with cold PSI air in their tires ... makes me salivate. Up yours, Bulls. Go Bucks.
Dcebucks11 wrote:
You do know that third year josh smith averaged more assists so far than third year giannis... Giannis has an efficiency advantage but Smith has a defensive advantage..
Giannis needs to play more consistent if he wants to top Josh Smith..
Jez2983 wrote:Trade Giannis for Noah Vonleh and 238 2nds.
John Murdoch wrote:VooDoo7 wrote:Giannis trade value is at an all-time high!! SELL!!!
Randle + Clarkson
emunney wrote:Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters
THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
BobbyLight wrote:I know a lot of people don't like going to Bulls games at the BC
coolhandluke121 wrote:Wish I had seen it.
BadgersBucks wrote:Games like this (or GSW, Cle games) are so frustrating in that it shows what they're capable of, but then you have to remember they just got pasted by a merely ok team just two days earlier. Too bad there's no consistency this year
paulpressey25 wrote:coolhandluke121 wrote:Wish I had seen it.
I always concurred with your thesis that this team will improve as the year goes along. We're seeing it last night and the prior Friday against the Mav's. Just too much talent, especially with Middleton blowing up.
But the question is can the learning curve ramp enough to make the playoffs or are we looking at one of those wasted seasons where we draft 13th?
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
tigerclan wrote:Well we have to do some work when Giannis comes back in Greece this summer.
A little bit of conversation with him on the open courts he is playing for fun with his brother, will have the result we all desire(if the bucks won't be reasonable and won't trade him now).
He will realize what is best for him(...although i do feel that he started to understand recently).
After all in the NBAs page in Greece, everybody agree.
Even the journalists started to realize that the bucks don't trust him so it will be for his own good to leave ASAP.
We will make it happen.
paulpressey25 wrote:
But the question is can the learning curve ramp enough to make the playoffs or are we looking at one of those wasted seasons where we draft 13th?
Last night was great, but the Knicks game proves otherwise. Coaches need to keep using Giannis like last night. Keep using him no matter what. Keep him positive no matter what. Same with Parker. These guys have more talent than likes of Mayo or Bayless.paulpressey25 wrote:coolhandluke121 wrote:Wish I had seen it.
I always concurred with your thesis that this team will improve as the year goes along. We're seeing it last night and the prior Friday against the Mav's. Just too much talent, especially with Middleton blowing up.
But the question is can the learning curve ramp enough to make the playoffs or are we looking at one of those wasted seasons where we draft 13th?
You know that Horford was the number 3 pick right?Badgerlander wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:
But the question is can the learning curve ramp enough to make the playoffs or are we looking at one of those wasted seasons where we draft 13th?
Maybe this is the year we get Horford instead of Yi
DutchManDanFan wrote:BadgersBucks wrote:Games like this (or GSW, Cle games) are so frustrating in that it shows what they're capable of, but then you have to remember they just got pasted by a merely ok team just two days earlier. Too bad there's no consistency this year
Why is it frustrating? It gives a glimpse of what the future might bring. You have to be able to beat the good teams and they show they already can. Now they have to learn to beat the mediocre teams consistently. Experience is needed for that. The young core grows more experience every day. The future looks bright!
msiris wrote:You know that Horford was the number 3 pick right?Badgerlander wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:
But the question is can the learning curve ramp enough to make the playoffs or are we looking at one of those wasted seasons where we draft 13th?
Maybe this is the year we get Horford instead of Yi
BadgersBucks wrote:DutchManDanFan wrote:BadgersBucks wrote:Games like this (or GSW, Cle games) are so frustrating in that it shows what they're capable of, but then you have to remember they just got pasted by a merely ok team just two days earlier. Too bad there's no consistency this year
Why is it frustrating? It gives a glimpse of what the future might bring. You have to be able to beat the good teams and they show they already can. Now they have to learn to beat the mediocre teams consistently. Experience is needed for that. The young core grows more experience every day. The future looks bright!
Simply because they can't do it consistently but you know it's there but they just don't seem to have the same effort every night. If a team is just bad you don't get teased at all. So it's frustrating in that they tease you with a game like this, then tonight they'll likely lose by 17.