Chapter29 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:I don't think Snell's going to get overpaid. I think he'll get exactly what he deserves ($12-$14 annually). Hope it's with the Bucks.
He isn't worth 14M in my eyes.
Time to get those eyes checked.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Chapter29 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:I don't think Snell's going to get overpaid. I think he'll get exactly what he deserves ($12-$14 annually). Hope it's with the Bucks.
He isn't worth 14M in my eyes.
DingleJerry wrote:Jimmmycrackcorn wrote:DingleJerry wrote:Right, I don't think anyone would be worried about paying Snell 10-12 mil if we weren't sitting on 21 mil of dead salary in Henson/Mirza. I wouldn't call Delly's 10 mil dead money as he's still a competent rotation player, but I think we'd all gladly slide his contract over to Snell instead.
I'd much rather find SOME way to slide Henson's or Mirza's money over to Snell than Delly's. But it might take heaven and earth to move those contracts.
Me too. I was just getting at if we hadn't blown our load last offseason. Say we never signed Delly, we'd gladly give his contract to Snell right now. But in the current state we have a cap crunch.
coolhandluke121 wrote:There are a lot of superior free agents in line to get paid before Monroe and Snell, and several teams blew all their cap space last summer. You can't just look at comparable contracts from previous seasons and use them to project contracts. I think they can keep Snell and Monroe for about $25m per season.
raferfenix wrote:If the Bucks dump Mirza and / or Henson I'd feel better about paying Snell upwards of $12 million. Still not great but better.
The risk is that Snell reverts to career norms or just doesn't improve much more and tops out at a rotation player who should be coming off the bench.
That's an expensive proposition if we'd still have two guys making $10 million+ that might not even be rotation players.
Signing Monroe long term comes into this equation as well. In a few years he could end up more of an 8-10th man only worth playing situationally if his defense falls a part with age and post-contract-year weight gain.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
blazza18 wrote:Snell doesn't even score 10 PPG. No way is he getting $10+ million. /Some GM somewhere before Hammond gives him 4/60.
BucksPackers wrote:Chapter29 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:I don't think Snell's going to get overpaid. I think he'll get exactly what he deserves ($12-$14 annually). Hope it's with the Bucks.
He isn't worth 14M in my eyes.
Time to get those eyes checked.
Ron Swanson wrote:Think it's important to understand that you should be banking on internal growth of a lot of these young players (Giannis, Thon, Brogdon) as the main means to improve the team for next season and subsequent years. You can't just assume that all young players improve over time, but it's more often a better approach in lieu of breaking the bank for a middle-tier free agent that doesn't put you over the top.
Chapter29 wrote:BucksPackers wrote:Chapter29 wrote:
He isn't worth 14M in my eyes.
Time to get those eyes checked.
Yeah ok.
Someone will likely pay him that. I wouldn't.
BucksPackers wrote:Ask Portland and Pelicans about giving Crabbe and Solomn big money for 3-D guys. Bet they are regretting it. All it takes is for snell to go back to his career below average 3 point shooting and we will be stuck with crap for 4 seasons. Kinda like we are with crappy mirza.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
blazza18 wrote:Snell had his moments but are we sure he's actually a good defender?
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”