Redd for Marvin/Bibby?

Zeus LA · Post #41 » by **Zeus LA** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:52 am

trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

That's not really saying much.

Sorry.......I meant Emeka Okafor

emunney · Post #42 » by **emunney** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:58 am

Wow, that is saying a lot. You'd take K-Mart over Okafor? K-Mart is a good defender, but I'd take Okafor on his rebounding alone, not to mention that he's younger and less injury prone.

trwi7 · Post #43 » by **trwi7** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:18 am

Wow Okafor>K-Mart and it really isn't close.

Zeus LA · Post #44 » by **Zeus LA** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:03 am

trwi7 wrote:Wow Okafor>K-Mart and it really isn't close.

This is the green text intended for my previous post.

Honestly though, I think Kenyon's type of game is what the bucks could really use.

fam3381 · Post #45 » by **fam3381** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:43 pm

Zeus LA wrote:Honestly though, I think Kenyon's type of game is what the bucks could really use.

If I could have Martin for $4 million season that'd be great, but we can't. He's also a terrible rebounder for a PF...he had a worse rebound rate than Yi this year.

msiris · Post #46 » by **msiris** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:09 pm

trwi7 wrote:Wow Okafor>K-Mart and it really isn't close.

Neither are worth it.

Nebula1 · Post #47 » by **Nebula1** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:46 pm

I don't think trading Redd is a good idea until we can see what he does with a better roster around him.

Johnny Newman · Post #48 » by **Johnny Newman** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:52 pm

I would still deal Mo for Haslem. Then start Sessions or draft pick or a vet we trade for that passes and plays D.

showtimesam · Post #49 » by **showtimesam** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:58 pm

Johnny Newman wrote:I would still deal Mo for Haslem. Then start Sessions or draft pick or a vet we trade for that passes and plays D.

me too

pilprin · Post #50 » by **pilprin** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:59 pm

In a heart beat, but why would ATL?

chuckerz · Post #51 » by **chuckerz** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:49 pm

Atlanta wouldn't want Redd period. They already have joe johnson so why would they need another scorer. Not to mention that Marvin's improvements in th last couple of years is enough to warrant that the hawks hold on to him.

For the bucks it would definitely help them. Johnson is a great team player and marvin is developing.

Nebula1 · Post #52 » by **Nebula1** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:54 pm

Redd should go play in Dallas, if anywhere.

I'd rather keep him though.

NotYoAvgNBAFan · Post #53 » by **NotYoAvgNBAFan** » Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:06 pm

Of course but why in the hell would the Hawks do this? It is absurd for them to even consider.

JJ is not giving up shots to Redd. He is the better player!

Chapter29 · Post #54 » by **Chapter29** » Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:43 am

I do recall the Redd JJ debates and I kind of saw both sides of the argument.

At this point its easy to say. I would take JJ any day of the week.

As for this trade? I don't know. Not a big MW fan and I have no interest in Bibby. I guess I just hope for more than this.