ImageImage

Chad Ford: Bucks Would Have Interest in Augustin

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

Chad Ford: Bucks Would Have Interest in Augustin 

Post#1 » by europa » Thu May 15, 2008 6:13 pm

From his chat today:

Ariel (Albany, NY): With DJ Augustin molding his game after Steve Nash, he seems like a perfect fit for the Knicks. Should they consider trading down to pick him if they can move a contract or pick up another piece?

SportsNation Chad Ford: I'm not sure how far you could trade down. The Bucks would have interest and so would the Pacers.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,289
And1: 6,239
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#2 » by LUKE23 » Thu May 15, 2008 6:14 pm

Yuck. That would be about worst case scenario for me.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,870
And1: 26,392
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#3 » by trwi7 » Thu May 15, 2008 6:19 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Yuck. That would be about worst case scenario for me.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Licensed to Il
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,246
And1: 2,741
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
 

 

Post#4 » by Licensed to Il » Thu May 15, 2008 6:19 pm

I'm not sure how Augistine brings anything to the table that Mo doesn't already. It is not like Mo is a bad player or has no talent. It's just that he doesn't fit with the direction the Bucks need to go.

While I am a firm believer in the draft strategy that you have to take the best guy available, I'm not sure Augistine is an upgrade over what we already have at the position.

One thing I will say about Skiles though, is his almost Stottsian preference for playing three guards at a time. He has stated that it opens up the floor, results in less turnovers, and produces better ball movement that in turns wears down defences. So it wouldn't shock me if the Bucks stocked up on guards this offseason.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,289
And1: 6,239
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#5 » by LUKE23 » Thu May 15, 2008 6:21 pm

Mo is as good of a scorer/shooter as Augustin could probably ever hope to be in the NBA. Mo put up 17+ on 48% this year, I'd be surprised if Augustin ever did that.

If Augustin was a standout defender, I'd be more apt to look at him, but he's not. Short and average lateral quickness. He's a better facillitator than Mo, but not enough to make up for the other shortcomings.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#6 » by europa » Thu May 15, 2008 6:22 pm

I think Augustin potentially (heavy emphasis on that word) can bring more to the table as a creator and leader than Mo can. I don't know if he'll be as bad defensively as Mo but it's unlikely he'll be very good given how he doesn't have the supreme quickness to compensate for his lack of height.

What strikes me most about this is this is the second time Ford has linked Augustin to the Bucks. First in his most recent mock and now in this chat. That leads me to wonder if he's hearing rumblings that suggest Hammond is looking for a new PG. It also makes me wonder if Hammond thinks Augustin has elite potential. Something's going on here for Ford to start linking Augustin to the Bucks when not long ago he was pretty much set on Gordon going to the Bucks and maybe Westbrook.
Nothing will not break me.
BucksRuleAll22
Banned User
Posts: 1,342
And1: 0
Joined: May 22, 2007

 

Post#7 » by BucksRuleAll22 » Thu May 15, 2008 6:31 pm

Nobody thinks Augustin is gonna be a elite player, and Chad Ford is the worst guy in sports to get a opinon or information from. Augustin is a mid to late 1st round pick. Hes 5'11 and is undersized and will never to be able to defend well in the NBA. He will resemble Jameer Nelson if he pans out.
fam3381
General Manager
Posts: 7,572
And1: 171
Joined: Jun 07, 2005
Location: Austin

 

Post#8 » by fam3381 » Thu May 15, 2008 6:35 pm

Remember Chuck Diesel also mentioned that the Bucks liked Augustin as of a couple months ago.
Retired Bucks blogger. Occasional Bucks podcaster.
User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 33,627
And1: 9,665
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

 

Post#9 » by MikeIsGood » Thu May 15, 2008 6:41 pm

BucksRuleAll22 wrote:and Chad Ford is the worst guy in sports to get a opinon or information from.


That's been false for about four years.

I certainly hope he's wrong and this case, and just speculating.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 60,929
And1: 26,025
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

 

Post#10 » by paulpressey25 » Thu May 15, 2008 6:53 pm

fam3381 wrote:Remember Chuck Diesel also mentioned that the Bucks liked Augustin as of a couple months ago.


But everybody from a couple months ago is gone.

I saw that blurb as well. I think that is Ford's conjecture rather than any inside info. Just my thoughts.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
worthlessBucks
RealGM
Posts: 22,449
And1: 4,824
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Bucks Logo
   

 

Post#11 » by worthlessBucks » Thu May 15, 2008 6:55 pm

fam3381 wrote:Remember Chuck Diesel also mentioned that the Bucks liked Augustin as of a couple months ago.

There's a new sheriff in town.

I don't mind Augustin's skill set, he's small and can't defend that well, but what does he do to improve this team? Our glaring weaknesses are on the defensive end and at small forward so unless Hammond has a trade package in mind to address those issues, I doubt they draft Augustin.
Go Bucks!
fam3381
General Manager
Posts: 7,572
And1: 171
Joined: Jun 07, 2005
Location: Austin

 

Post#12 » by fam3381 » Thu May 15, 2008 7:03 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:But everybody from a couple months ago is gone.


Not in the scouting department...Babcock and Gilmartin were the main guys there and they still are. I think it's correct to think Hammond and the Detroit crew's thinking might reverse the Bucks' opinion on some guys, but among the people involved in draft preparations, there's been some continuity (which given the logistical problem with firing the guys who have scouted your draft prospects, that might not be a coincidence).
Retired Bucks blogger. Occasional Bucks podcaster.
Licensed to Il
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,246
And1: 2,741
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
 

 

Post#13 » by Licensed to Il » Thu May 15, 2008 7:05 pm

Obviously this is all speculation, so it would be foolish of me to say that my speculation is better than someone elses.

But this is the time of the year when GMs and assistants (and agents) buddy up to media members in order to confuse their peers. For example, if Hammond really did want Westbrook, it would be very clever to "leak" how much the Bucks liked Augistine. Same thing if the Bucks were interested in Love, Nic Batum, etc.

The one thing I feel we can conclude, is that niether Hammond nor Skiles value undersized guards who don't defend well. Hammond was involved in building a roster around Billups and drafting Stuckey. Skiles relied almost exclusively on Hinrich and Duhon, two guys who are not great shooters or creators but defend exceptionally well.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#14 » by europa » Thu May 15, 2008 7:10 pm

Yea I like Augustin and wouldn't have any problems with the Bucks drafting him but given the importance Hammond has placed on the PG position and defense I can't see him drafting Augustin. He'd have to think Augustin brings elite PG skills to the table and while I do think Augustin will be a good PG I don't think he'll be a great one.

He'd be a nice fit with the Knicks, though.
Nothing will not break me.
Licensed to Il
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,246
And1: 2,741
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
 

 

Post#15 » by Licensed to Il » Thu May 15, 2008 7:18 pm

The Knicks are going to need to identify a guy who can get the ball up the court in a hurry, shoot, and run the pick and roll.

Obviously they are not going to find the next Steve Nash, but they don't got anyone on their roster who fits that mold of "seven seconds or less" point guard. I mean, you could play that way with Marbury and Crawford, but you would only win ten games.

Also, Phoenix (pre-Shaq) never put more than one guy on the floor at a time that was dead weight offensively, because that gave the D a person to double team and trap with. And the beauty of the scheme was that Nash would run the pick and roll with Amare until you trapped and doubled to stop it, and then he would find the open guy lined up on the perimiter for a 3.

The additions of Grant Hill and Shaq really killed that one thing that made Phoenix great (that you culdn't double without giving up the three pointer to a great shooter).

It would take about 7 trades before NY had the roster to run that scheme successfully.

Curry and Randolph are perhaps the two worst fits in the league for D'ntoni's system.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#16 » by europa » Thu May 15, 2008 7:21 pm

I agree their roster is a mess. But if they land Augustin or trade for Ford and draft Mayo, that'd be a helluva nice start in my opinion.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 113
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

 

Post#17 » by DH34Phan » Thu May 15, 2008 7:44 pm

europa wrote:I agree their roster is a mess. But if they land Augustin or trade for Ford and draft Mayo, that'd be a helluva nice start in my opinion.

Any team with TJ Ford is headed for greatness. LMAO.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,289
And1: 6,239
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#18 » by LUKE23 » Thu May 15, 2008 7:48 pm

Yeah, TJ has slowly regressed throughout his career. I don't think he was any better than an average PG this past season, otherwise Toronto is probably better in the East than they were.

I loved TJ his rookie year. I haven't seen him play like that consistently since though. There were a lot of Raptor fan complaints about him this season as it wore on.
fam3381
General Manager
Posts: 7,572
And1: 171
Joined: Jun 07, 2005
Location: Austin

 

Post#19 » by fam3381 » Thu May 15, 2008 7:55 pm

Ford had a strange season. The injury scare and the attitude stuff combined with Calderon's excellence has put him on the outs, but his per-minute averages in scoring and steals were up, assists were unchanged, and turnovers were down. His PER of 20+ was a career high and generally outstanding. As a basketball fan I'd love to see him get a chance to start again in New York.
Retired Bucks blogger. Occasional Bucks podcaster.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#20 » by europa » Thu May 15, 2008 8:00 pm

fam3381 wrote:Ford had a strange season. The injury scare and the attitude stuff combined with Calderon's excellence has put him on the outs, but his per-minute averages in scoring and steals were up, assists were unchanged, and turnovers were down. His PER of 20+ was a career high and generally outstanding. As a basketball fan I'd love to see him get a chance to start again in New York.


Good post. There's nothing in Ford's production that suggests he is regressing. The opposite is actually true. He averaged 14-7 on 51% FG shooting as a starter. Any PG who can shoot over 50% from the floor is having a sick season but T.J. Ford? I don't think there's anybody who honestly believed Ford would ever shoot that high a percentage. Well T.J. probably did. :D Seriously, he played exceptionally well as a starter. The problem was he absolutely stunk coming off the bench.

I think the big problem the Raptors have is they have two very talented young PGs who need to play 30-35 minutes per game. Dividing up the minutes equally isn't helping either of them do the most they can and it's no longer helping the team win. I expect Ford will be traded and I agree with you, I think he'd be a great fit in New York and he'd be a really nice fit in Portland.
Nothing will not break me.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks