ImageImage

I've seen this deal mentioned, but how bout an alternate...

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
BlaZeN27
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,766
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 08, 2008
Location: Miami
Contact:

I've seen this deal mentioned, but how bout an alternate... 

Post#1 » by BlaZeN27 » Tue May 27, 2008 6:16 am

I've seen the Haslem for Mo Williams trade suggestion quite a few times, but what about an alternate trade like this...


Udonis Haslem
Marcus Banks
2009 2nd Round Pick (We have the Pacers, Sixers, and our 2nd round picks, say we give you the highest pick, 30-37 range)

For


Mo Williams
Desmond Mason
User avatar
NotYoAvgNBAFan
Junior
Posts: 393
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 18, 2008

 

Post#2 » by NotYoAvgNBAFan » Tue May 27, 2008 10:16 am

Give up Simmons....not Desmond.

Keep Desmond Mason at all cost...I say. :nod:

User avatar
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,040
And1: 17,187
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: Milwaukee
       

Re: I've seen this deal mentioned, but how bout an alternate 

Post#3 » by skones » Tue May 27, 2008 10:36 am

BlaZeN27 wrote:I've seen the Haslem for Mo Williams trade suggestion quite a few times, but what about an alternate trade like this...


Udonis Haslem
Marcus Banks
2009 2nd Round Pick (We have the Pacers, Sixers, and our 2nd round picks, say we give you the highest pick, 30-37 range)

For


Mo Williams
Desmond Mason


I'm not even a Mo for Haslem fan, but I can live with it. When you throw in a contract like Marcus Banks for an expiring deal in Mason it makes it an easy no IMO.
User avatar
SupremeHustle
RealGM
Posts: 27,184
And1: 28,484
Joined: Feb 11, 2005
Location: Cloud 9
 

 

Post#4 » by SupremeHustle » Tue May 27, 2008 2:02 pm

Mo for Haslem is one of the goofiest ideas a group of normally levelheaded posters has ever concocted and agreed upon.
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,558
And1: 35,017
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

 

Post#5 » by ReasonablySober » Tue May 27, 2008 2:21 pm

SupremeHustle wrote:Mo for Haslem is one of the goofiest ideas a group of normally levelheaded posters has ever concocted and agreed upon.


Yup. I don't care how much you hate Mo, but dealing him for a 20 mpg backup PF with zero upside is as dumb as it gets.

Haslem's great if you can hide him next to a couple legit stars. But he's a liability here.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,870
And1: 26,392
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#6 » by trwi7 » Tue May 27, 2008 3:09 pm

SupremeHustle wrote:Mo for Haslem is one of the goofiest ideas a group of normally levelheaded posters has ever concocted and agreed upon.


We're definitely on the same page on this one. Adding Banks and a 2nd for Mason's expiring just makes it worse.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 60,944
And1: 26,048
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

 

Post#7 » by paulpressey25 » Tue May 27, 2008 3:14 pm

SupremeHustle wrote:Mo for Haslem is one of the goofiest ideas a group of normally levelheaded posters has ever concocted and agreed upon.


I think part of this deal is about the money. Mo's got $44mm large still coming his way versus I think 2-years/$13mm for Haslem. If Mo isn't your starting PG, I'd take a defensive PF who averaged 9rpg with a much more affordable contract in the salary structure of things.

But if the decision is to trade Redd for Josh Howard and hang onto CV and Mo for another year to see what happens with Skiles, I could be ok with that.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
Zeus LA
Junior
Posts: 292
And1: 118
Joined: Aug 03, 2006
Location: Basketball Pergatory

 

Post#8 » by Zeus LA » Tue May 27, 2008 3:16 pm

trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



We're definitely on the same page on this one. Adding Banks and a 2nd for Mason's expiring just makes it worse.


Me too.
I'm not a Mo fan, but I think his value would be higher than Haslem. I think Haslem is undersized and somewhat overrated.

Good player, but you don't target him for your starting lineup IMO.
And now it's over to...Moira
smooth 'lil balla
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,964
And1: 8
Joined: Nov 20, 2003

 

Post#9 » by smooth 'lil balla » Tue May 27, 2008 4:43 pm

agree. I dislike Mo, but Haslem? What's the fascination people?

Return to Milwaukee Bucks