Bucks/Cavs/Grizz

More Bang For The Bucks · Post #1 » by **More Bang For The Bucks** » Wed May 28, 2008 1:54 am

Bucks get Miller, Lowry, Warrick, and Collins 1 year left

Cavs get Redd

Grizz get #19, 2010 1st(top 10 protec) from Cavs, Varajeo, CV, and Wally exp

Memphis gets Crittenton in the lineup and drafts Kevin Love
Bucks trade Mo for Haslem & Cook

Haslem/Warrick/Ersan/Randolph or Gallanari
Yi/Ersan/Haslem
Bogut/Collins/Gadzuric
Sessions/Lowry/Bell
Miller/Cook/Warrick

Gay
Love/CV/Varajeo
Darko/Varejao
Crittenton
Conley

Post #2 » by **paulpressey25** » Wed May 28, 2008 2:20 am

I give you credit for trying to get Redd to Cleveland but bringing more value back to us.

But I don't like this combination. We are giving up Redd and CV and only really getting back Mike Miller. Lowry is a crapshoot and Warrick effectively a bust.

Licensed to Il · Post #3 » by **Licensed to Il** » Wed May 28, 2008 2:26 am

Nice attempt, but Miller isn't above average at anything but shooting. We are going to need to get our scoring from somewhere, it might as well be from Redd. Skiles did a very good job of getting production out of a much more one dimensional player (than Redd) in Ben Gordon. So I don't get why everyone wants to ship off Redd for average players and backups.

I do like Mike Miller, as well as Lowry.

But if we trade Redd, I feel we need a borderline all star in return. Not an Old Country Buffet of misplaced youngsters and fading vets.

Post #4 » by **ReasonablySober** » Wed May 28, 2008 2:29 am

Warrick could be a starter somewhere. I've thought that since his game against the Bucks back in December of '06. Gasol was down with an injury and Warrick lit us up to the tune of 31 and 13.

As a starter, in 74 career games, he's averaged 15.3 points and 6.6 rebounds. As a sub, in 150 career games, those averages drop to 6.8 and 2.8.

More Bang For The Bucks · Post #5 » by **More Bang For The Bucks** » Wed May 28, 2008 2:32 am

I see your point Press, I think Memphis would be foolish to give us Miller for CV and Dez. Maybe we could meet them in the middle and include the new #3 plan on your list.

EastSideBucksFan · Post #6 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Wed May 28, 2008 2:35 am

Will Perdude wrote:
But if we trade Redd, I feel we need a borderline all star in return. Not an Old Country Buffet of misplaced youngsters and fading vets.

nice

L&H_05 · Post #7 » by **L&H_05** » Wed May 28, 2008 7:19 am

Well, I don't believe the Cavs can give up consecutive 1st round picks, and if even if they could, I sure as hell would hope they wouldn't, unless it's for an Elton Brand type of player...

If that's the case, I would rather cut Milwaukee out of the scenario, and focus a package around Miller, Lowry and Warrick...

AussieBuck · Post #8 » by **AussieBuck** » Wed May 28, 2008 11:49 am

Be honest, this was just an excuse to make a Gay-Love pairing wasn't it?

nuttinbutta Big Dog party · Post #9 » by **nuttinbutta Big Dog party** » Wed May 28, 2008 1:53 pm

AussieBuck wrote:Be honest, this was just an excuse to make a Gay-Love pairing wasn't it?

That's awesome... :lol:

LISTEN2JAZZ · Post #10 » by **LISTEN2JAZZ** » Wed May 28, 2008 2:13 pm

I don't have an opinion on this, but just want to suggest a format that's easy to read.

Bucks give: x, y, z
Bucks get: a, b, c

Cavs give: ....
Cavs get: etc

It takes too long to evaluate whether a trade is good for one of the teams involved when your eyes are dancing all over the screen trying to figure out which players they're sending out.