GOBlazers wrote:Is there no public education in Milwaukee? Or do people just think they can succeed selling cheese?
That's a pretty wonk burn, especially coming from someone who roots for an Oregonian team.
3 Trades. Redd and Mo gone.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Very original.-
Chapter29
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,585
- And1: 1,224
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Location: Wauwatosa, WI
-
I'm all over that 1st trade. Chicago likely declines though.
I don't care for the others though, but I do agree with Mid that Brown if he can be had for cheap would fit a need for us and is a half way decent player.
I don't understand the love for Outlaw and I have zero interest if Frye. We have both CV and Yi to fill the soft outside jumper PF role and at least Yi can defend.
Mike Miller would be ok, but not if we are planning on acquiring Hughes.
I would say make the 1st deal and look to move Mo for Haslem or package either Mo or CV with our pick to move up or acquire a better player.
I don't care for the others though, but I do agree with Mid that Brown if he can be had for cheap would fit a need for us and is a half way decent player.
I don't understand the love for Outlaw and I have zero interest if Frye. We have both CV and Yi to fill the soft outside jumper PF role and at least Yi can defend.
Mike Miller would be ok, but not if we are planning on acquiring Hughes.
I would say make the 1st deal and look to move Mo for Haslem or package either Mo or CV with our pick to move up or acquire a better player.
-
Debit One
- Starter
- Posts: 2,362
- And1: 84
- Joined: Apr 21, 2005
- Location: YOU WANNA KNOW HOW I FEEL ABOUT THIS TEAM?
Chapter29 wrote:
Mike Miller would be ok, but not if we are planning on acquiring Hughes.
On the contrary, I'd say that if we acquired Hughes, you MUST have a SF who is a top notch outside shooter to go with him to make up for his deficit in that area, and I don't think that you can trust Simmons to fill that role.
I think that the Miller move is an essential part of this plan, which by the way I heartily endorse.
-
smooth 'lil balla
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,964
- And1: 8
- Joined: Nov 20, 2003
-
EastSideBucksFan
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,712
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
-
midranger wrote:Why is everyone soooooooooo down on Kwame?
Sure he's not a great, or good, basketball player. BUT, he does play very solid post defense, and as a 14 minute backup, that's all I would require. It'd certainly be a step up from Gadzuric.
1. Extremely low basketball IQ
2. Injury Issues
3. He sucks
4. I'd rather pay someone who has the chance of not sucking