Bernman wrote:Skiles just propelled a cruise missile onto Mo Nation.
I am in Sarajevo but even here I can hear them screaming
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Bernman wrote:Skiles just propelled a cruise missile onto Mo Nation.
old skool wrote:I read that when he did run the floor and seal his man, that he should get the ball. I think that this is as much about Bogut not running the floor as much as sKiles would like, as it is with the guards not delivering the ball.
xTitan wrote:hmmmm lets read more into this statement, If Skiles wants bogut to run the floor more that means someone else other than Bogut is going to have to help with rebounding, which hopefully means they plan on bringing in a big time rebounding/defending 4....................I know its a huge reach but what the hell.
Sigra wrote:Bernman wrote:Skiles just propelled a cruise missile onto Mo Nation.
I am in Sarajevo but even here I can hear them screaming
Sigra wrote:Only 2 pages here? It is sad honestly. It shows you how anti Bogut this forum has been for years.
old skool wrote:One of the things that you will learn about sKiles is that (unless you are Kirk Hinrich) every player is a target for improvement. He does not want any player getting complacent. He is not about Mo/Redd being wrong and Bogut being right. He will lay out those things that each player needs to do better.
Curry was the Bulls leading scorer his last year in Chicago, but only third in the number of shots taken. Ben Gordon, as a rookie coming of the bench, played more minutes and took even more shots. Gordon took about 20% more shots per minute played than did Curry. At the end of the game, sKiles Bulls were a very perimeter oriented team.
oLd sKool
xTitan wrote:I absoluetly love this quote and it gives me some hope with this new regime.Bucks coach Scott Skiles was asked about the ideal position for Bogut, in the high post or the low post
"However, I've got to tell you, in watching almost every minute of every game (on film)
Epicurus wrote:So said LK also at about this time last season.
El Duderino wrote:We were the the 2nd worst defensive team in back to back years, along with being poor at rebounding. If Skiles can get the Bucks somewhere around the middle of the pack on defense and rebounding, i'm confident that however the offense is run, it will be efficient enough to be a 42ish win team.
europa wrote:Epicurus wrote:So said LK also at about this time last season.
True, but Krystkowiak lacked the strength to back up his talk with action so his words rang hollow which is one of the many reasons why the players began to tune him out as quickly as they did. Skiles is a proven winner with the full support of management who has proven in the past he will make an example of players who won't play the way he wants them to play. One thing about Skiles is he isn't afraid to back up his talk with action so I fully believe he'll succeed in ways where Krystkowiak, Stotts and Porter have all failed in recent years.