ImageImage

Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
BobbyLight
RealGM
Posts: 10,027
And1: 1,546
Joined: Jul 29, 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Contact:
 

Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09 

Post#441 » by BobbyLight » Sun Feb 8, 2009 4:45 am

Fair enough...
aboveAverage
RealGM
Posts: 10,790
And1: 2,604
Joined: Mar 25, 2006
 

Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09 

Post#442 » by aboveAverage » Sun Feb 8, 2009 4:51 am

LUKE23 wrote:
BobbyLight wrote:If we let Sessions or CV walk I am no longer a Bucks fan.


+1

Still want Conley?
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,289
And1: 6,239
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09 

Post#443 » by LUKE23 » Sun Feb 8, 2009 4:54 am

Yep. Until I see RJ traded I would still do Sessions/JA for Conley/Lakers first. You cannot gloat until Sessions is re-signed, nothing he does is relevant til then regarding the Conley deal.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 38,412
And1: 9,993
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09 

Post#444 » by midranger » Sun Feb 8, 2009 4:55 am

paul wrote:
midranger wrote:I'd take a year of losses like this rather than a 38 win 8th seed.


Thats such a nonsense post. Of course you would, however if the team played like that night in and night out they'd win more than 38 games anyway.

Those saying RJ shouldn't have gotten the ball, someone else can check but I'm pretty sure with Lue traded RJ is our best 3 point shooter % wise. Let's not ruin a great game with self serving stuff.

:lol:

Paul, disagreeing just to disagree.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,207
And1: 5,126
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09 

Post#445 » by REDDzone » Sun Feb 8, 2009 4:55 am

LUKE23 wrote:Yep. Until I see RJ traded I would still do Sessions/JA for Conley/Lakers first. You cannot gloat until Sessions is re-signed, nothing he does is relevant til then regarding the Conley deal.


Yea, pretending like it was just a player swap with no contractual concerns whatsoever is dishonest.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
aboveAverage
RealGM
Posts: 10,790
And1: 2,604
Joined: Mar 25, 2006
 

Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09 

Post#446 » by aboveAverage » Sun Feb 8, 2009 4:55 am

I can gloat. I said he was way better than Conley, and this helps prove it. So I'm going to gloat as much as I can.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,289
And1: 6,239
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09 

Post#447 » by LUKE23 » Sun Feb 8, 2009 4:59 am

aboveAverage wrote:I can gloat. I said he was way better than Conley, and this helps prove it. So I'm going to gloat as much as I can.


Yep, continue to ignore the points laid out. You're clueless beyond words if you don't think Sessions contract doesn't come into play.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,861
And1: 26,373
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09 

Post#448 » by trwi7 » Sun Feb 8, 2009 5:02 am

LUKE23 wrote:
aboveAverage wrote:I can gloat. I said he was way better than Conley, and this helps prove it. So I'm going to gloat as much as I can.


Yep, continue to ignore the points laid out. You're clueless beyond words if you don't think Sessions contract doesn't come into play.


I think he turned the salary cap off in his video game, so he can re-sign anybody anytime he wants to.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,289
And1: 6,239
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09 

Post#449 » by LUKE23 » Sun Feb 8, 2009 5:06 am

People are acting like both Sessions and Conley are under the same contractual situations here. If that was the case, I would want to keep Sessions based on his play recently. But until there is an indication that RJ will be moved, I think some team will throw an offer out there this offseason that we have trouble matching (probably for both he and CV) given our current financial situation. We're sitting around $70M next year if we don't make any deadline salary clearing moves.

If Sessions does go, then it becomes Alexander for Conley/Lakers 1st. Who would be up in arms about that deal? My guess is few.
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09 

Post#450 » by jerrod » Sun Feb 8, 2009 5:07 am

what is with you guys


there's been no disagreement (aside from obsessed fan nebula) that sessions wasn't having a great season, but now he puts up these numbers once in a loss and he's god.
User avatar
yuedar
Rookie
Posts: 1,066
And1: 58
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
   

Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09 

Post#451 » by yuedar » Sun Feb 8, 2009 7:03 am

The guys always been good and he just needs consistant minutes and a decent supporting cast to prove it. The rest of the season he has this chance assuming the bucks dont F up and trade him before the deadline and I am anxious to see him explode and make alot of posters on here eat their words.

Simply put a guy doesnt put up 44/12 and also own the bucks assists record within basically 1 full year of playing and not be minimum starting material or vice versa a stud. He should have been our starting point this year and for many years to come and if we arent able to get him signed then our front office should be the ones fired for such ineptitude.

However, I see CV getting lazy after he cash's in on a big contract so seeing him walk wouldn't bother me as much. Thought ill admit hes playing great now. I just see it as more of a motivational thing for his contract and we know when hes motiviated he plays great. I just see him losing that after he gets his $$.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks