Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
- BobbyLight
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,027
- And1: 1,546
- Joined: Jul 29, 2004
- Location: Milwaukee, WI
- Contact:
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,790
- And1: 2,604
- Joined: Mar 25, 2006
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
LUKE23 wrote:BobbyLight wrote:If we let Sessions or CV walk I am no longer a Bucks fan.
+1
Still want Conley?
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,289
- And1: 6,239
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
Yep. Until I see RJ traded I would still do Sessions/JA for Conley/Lakers first. You cannot gloat until Sessions is re-signed, nothing he does is relevant til then regarding the Conley deal.
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,412
- And1: 9,993
- Joined: May 12, 2002
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
paul wrote:midranger wrote:I'd take a year of losses like this rather than a 38 win 8th seed.
Thats such a nonsense post. Of course you would, however if the team played like that night in and night out they'd win more than 38 games anyway.
Those saying RJ shouldn't have gotten the ball, someone else can check but I'm pretty sure with Lue traded RJ is our best 3 point shooter % wise. Let's not ruin a great game with self serving stuff.
Paul, disagreeing just to disagree.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,207
- And1: 5,126
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
LUKE23 wrote:Yep. Until I see RJ traded I would still do Sessions/JA for Conley/Lakers first. You cannot gloat until Sessions is re-signed, nothing he does is relevant til then regarding the Conley deal.
Yea, pretending like it was just a player swap with no contractual concerns whatsoever is dishonest.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,790
- And1: 2,604
- Joined: Mar 25, 2006
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
I can gloat. I said he was way better than Conley, and this helps prove it. So I'm going to gloat as much as I can.
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,289
- And1: 6,239
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
aboveAverage wrote:I can gloat. I said he was way better than Conley, and this helps prove it. So I'm going to gloat as much as I can.
Yep, continue to ignore the points laid out. You're clueless beyond words if you don't think Sessions contract doesn't come into play.
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 110,861
- And1: 26,373
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
LUKE23 wrote:aboveAverage wrote:I can gloat. I said he was way better than Conley, and this helps prove it. So I'm going to gloat as much as I can.
Yep, continue to ignore the points laid out. You're clueless beyond words if you don't think Sessions contract doesn't come into play.
I think he turned the salary cap off in his video game, so he can re-sign anybody anytime he wants to.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,289
- And1: 6,239
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
People are acting like both Sessions and Conley are under the same contractual situations here. If that was the case, I would want to keep Sessions based on his play recently. But until there is an indication that RJ will be moved, I think some team will throw an offer out there this offseason that we have trouble matching (probably for both he and CV) given our current financial situation. We're sitting around $70M next year if we don't make any deadline salary clearing moves.
If Sessions does go, then it becomes Alexander for Conley/Lakers 1st. Who would be up in arms about that deal? My guess is few.
If Sessions does go, then it becomes Alexander for Conley/Lakers 1st. Who would be up in arms about that deal? My guess is few.
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
- jerrod
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,178
- And1: 133
- Joined: Aug 31, 2003
- Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
what is with you guys
there's been no disagreement (aside from obsessed fan nebula) that sessions wasn't having a great season, but now he puts up these numbers once in a loss and he's god.
there's been no disagreement (aside from obsessed fan nebula) that sessions wasn't having a great season, but now he puts up these numbers once in a loss and he's god.
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
- yuedar
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,066
- And1: 58
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Re: Bucks vs Pistons - 2/7/09
The guys always been good and he just needs consistant minutes and a decent supporting cast to prove it. The rest of the season he has this chance assuming the bucks dont F up and trade him before the deadline and I am anxious to see him explode and make alot of posters on here eat their words.
Simply put a guy doesnt put up 44/12 and also own the bucks assists record within basically 1 full year of playing and not be minimum starting material or vice versa a stud. He should have been our starting point this year and for many years to come and if we arent able to get him signed then our front office should be the ones fired for such ineptitude.
However, I see CV getting lazy after he cash's in on a big contract so seeing him walk wouldn't bother me as much. Thought ill admit hes playing great now. I just see it as more of a motivational thing for his contract and we know when hes motiviated he plays great. I just see him losing that after he gets his $$.
Simply put a guy doesnt put up 44/12 and also own the bucks assists record within basically 1 full year of playing and not be minimum starting material or vice versa a stud. He should have been our starting point this year and for many years to come and if we arent able to get him signed then our front office should be the ones fired for such ineptitude.
However, I see CV getting lazy after he cash's in on a big contract so seeing him walk wouldn't bother me as much. Thought ill admit hes playing great now. I just see it as more of a motivational thing for his contract and we know when hes motiviated he plays great. I just see him losing that after he gets his $$.